The effect of impaired unilateral ankle propulsion on contralateral knee joint loading

E Daniel Syrett,Carrie L Peterson,Benjamin J Darter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.07.002

Abstract:Background: Impairments in unilateral ankle propulsion may result from restriction by an external device or pathology such as lower limb amputation. Models of gait suggest this reduction may lead to increased collisional force on the contralateral side, potentially increasing force through the knee and increasing the risk of knee pain or osteoarthritis. Research question: How do restrictions in unilateral ankle propulsive force affect contralateral knee joint loading in otherwise healthy individuals? Methods: 18 individuals without impairment walked on a treadmill at 1.5 m/s for two conditions: one free of restrictions, and one where a randomized limb's ankle propulsive force was restricted using an off-the-shelf ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). Ankle propulsive power, lower extremity joint work, and ground reaction force variables were calculated for the final 3 gait cycles of each condition. Tibiofemoral joint contact force (TJCF) for the limb contralateral to the AFO was calculated through a standard OpenSim workflow utilizing the gait2392 model. Intra-limb pair-wise comparisons were made between conditions. Results: Compared to walking unrestricted, the limb wearing the AFO demonstrated a significant reduction in peak ankle propulsive power and positive ankle work by approximately 50 % each (p<0.01). With ankle restriction, the ipsilateral knee significantly increased positive work (p<0.01). The overall propulsion produced by that limb did not change between conditions, demonstrated by a lack of change in anterior ground reaction force impulse (p=0.11). The knee of the limb contralateral to the AFO did not display differences in any TJCF variable between conditions (all p>0.07). Significance: These results suggest a unilateral deficit in ankle propulsion will not increase contralateral knee joint forces in individuals who are able to use other joints of the limb to compensate for the loss of ankle function. However, further research should investigate this relationship in those who display pathologies that may prevent more proximal compensations.