Abstract:Importance: Classic statements of research ethics generally advise against dual-role consent in which physician-investigators seek consent for research participation from patients with whom they have preexisting treatment relationships. Yet dual-role consent is common in clinical oncology research, as studies are often conducted in close relationship with clinical care. Objective: To explore key stakeholders' perspectives on dual-role consent in clinical oncology trials. Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative study with 43 participants was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center from 2018 to 2022. Semistructured qualitative interviews of physician-investigators, research coordinators, and patients were performed. Respondents were recruited from 3 populations: (1) physician-investigators engaged in clinical oncology research; (2) research coordinators engaged in clinical oncology research; and (3) patients, with and without prior clinical trial experience, who had received a new cancer diagnosis at least 2 months prior to enrollment in this study. Main outcomes and measures: Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. A thematic analysis approach was used to develop a codebook that included both theory-driven, a priori codes and emergent, inductive codes. Two authors double-coded all transcripts and met regularly to compare coding, discuss discrepancies, refine the codebook, and draft memos describing relevant themes and their frequency. Results: Among the 43 respondents, 28 (65.1%) were female; 9 (20.9%) were African American, 8 (18.6%) were Asian, 6 (14.0%) were Hispanic, and 21 (48.8%) were White; 15 were physician-investigators (6 [40.0%] with 6-10 years of experience, 4 [26.7%] with at least 20 years of experience), 13 were research coordinators (5 [38.5%] with 0-5 years of experience, 5 [38.5%] with 6-10 years of experience), and 15 were patients (9 [60.0%] aged 46-64 years). Four main themes were found: interviewees (1) perceived greater potential for role synergy than for role conflict; (2) reported dual-role consent as having mixed effects on the consent process, increasing prospective participants' understanding and likelihood of agreement while also challenging voluntariness; (3) preferred a team-based approach to the consent process in which physician-investigators and research coordinators share responsibility for communicating with prospective participants and safeguarding voluntariness; and (4) offered strategies for managing tensions in dual-role consent. Conclusions and relevance: This qualitative study found that concerns about dual-role consent in clinical oncology, while valid, may be outweighed by corresponding advantages, particularly if appropriate mitigation strategies are in place. These findings support a team-based approach to informed consent, in which physician-investigators and research coordinators promote both the understanding and voluntariness of prospective participants.

[Broad informed consent or partial informed consent]

Rescuing Informed Consent: How the new "Key Information" and "Reasonable Person" Provisions in the Revised U.S. Common Rule open the door to long Overdue Informed Consent Disclosure Improvements and why we need to walk Through that door

Autonomy of Patients and Informed Consent in Clinical Practice

Informed consent in clinical practice: Old problems, new challenges

Longitudinal Informed Consent Competency in Stable Community Patients with Schizophrenia: A One-Week Training and One-Year Follow-Up Study

Evolution of informed consent in research: From the Hippocratic Oath to the tailored consent

Reshaping informed consent in the biobanking context

Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis

Evolving Understanding of Patients' Experiences in Acute Care Trials Without Prospective Consent*

Waiving the consent requirement to mitigate bias in observational precision medicine research

Enhancing Professional Awareness of Informed Consent : Safeguarding the Rights of Patients and Practitioners

Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review

Mental health aspects of the informed consent process

Ethical analysis of informed consent methods in longitudinal cohort studies: A Chinese perspective

The Application of Electronic Informed Consent

The ethical inadequacy of uninformed surrogate consent: advancing respect for persons in clinical research

Informed consent: what does it mean?

An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine

Physician-Investigator, Research Coordinator, and Patient Perspectives on Dual-Role Consent in Oncology: A Qualitative Study

Lost in 'Culturation': medical informed consent in China (from a Western perspective)

Thinking about the idea of consent in data science genomics: How 'informed' is it?