The effect and mechanism of low-dose esketamine in neuropathic pain-related depression-like behavior in rats

Lijuan Wang,Shuwu Zhao,Jiali Shao,Chen Su
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149117
2024-11-15
Abstract:Background: Clinical evidence suggests that Esketamine (ESK) is an effective treatment for depression. However, the effects of Esketamine in treating depression-like behavior induced by neuropathic pain is unclear. The underlying molecular mechanisms require further investigation to provide new therapeutic targets for the treatment of clinical neuropathic pain-related depression. Methods: A neuropathic pain-related depression model was established in rats with spared nerve injury (SNI). Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: Sham Group, SNI group, SNI + Normal Saline (NS) Group and SNI + ESK5mg/kg Group. Mechanical pain thresholds were measured to assess pain sensitivity in SNI rats. On the 14th day after surgery a forced swim test and sucrose preference test were used to evaluate the depressive-like behavior of rats in each group. Further, a proteomic analysis was used to quantify differentially expressed proteins. The Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were analyzed to explore the main protein targets of SNI in the medial prefrontal cortex. The expression of proteins was detected by Western blotting. Results: A neuropathic pain-related depression model was established. Compared with the Sham group, the mechanical pain threshold was decreased significantly (13.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.7 ± 0.01 g n = 8), while immobility on the forced swim test was also decreased (93.1 ± 7.4 vs. 169.5 ± 9.6 s n = 8), and sucrose preference rate was significantly increased (98.8 ± 0.3 vs. 73.1 ± 1.4n = 7) in SNI group rats. Compared with the SNI + NS group, the mechanical pain threshold was not statistically significant, while immobility on the forced swim test was clearly decreased (161.1 ± 11.6 vs. 77.9 ± 5.0 s n = 8), and sucrose preference rate was significantly increased (53.1 ± 8.9 vs. 96.1 ± 1.4n = 7) in SNI + ESK5mg/kg group rats. To further investigate the underlying mechanism, we employed proteomics to identify proteins exhibiting more than a 1.2-fold difference (P < 0.05) in expression levels within each group for subsequent analysis. Relative to the Sham group, 88 downregulated and 104 up-regulated proteins were identified in the SNI group, while 120 and 84 proteins were up- and down-regulated in the Esketamine treatment group compared with the SNI + NS group. Compared with Sham group, the expressions of mGluR5 and Homer1a were up-regulated in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in SNI group (mGluR5:0.97 ± 0.05 vs 1.47 ± 0.15, Homer1a:1.03 ± 0.06 vs 1.46 ± 0.16n = 6), and down-regulated after intervention with Esketamine (mGluR5:1.54 ± 0.11 vs 1.06 ± 0.07, Homer1a:1.51 ± 0.13 vs 1.12 ± 0.34n = 6). Conclusions: Low-dose Esketamine appeared to relieve depression-like behavior induced by neuropathic pain. The Homer1a-mGluR5 signaling pathway might be the mechanism of antidepressant effect of Esketamine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?