Abstract:Military standards and literature sources recommend use of polychromatic light source of 2856K color temperature in testing image intensifier tubes. Tungsten halogen bulbs are standard sources of radiation used in commercially available test stations. However, there are two main disadvantages of tungsten bulbs: short life time and temporal changes of both light power and light spectrum. Application of monochromatic semiconductor sources in testing of image intensifiers as possible alternative of halogen bulbs is analyzed in this paper. It is shown that, if calibrated properly, monochromatic semiconductor sources can be used in stations for testing image intensifier tubes. Military standards require use of polychromatic light sources of 2856K color temperature in testing image intensifier tubes[1.a.i.[1]-1.a.i.[6]]. Tungsten halogen bulbs have been standard sources of radiation used in commercially available test stations for last few decades in testing image intensifier tubes [1.a.i.[7],1.a.i.[8]]. However, tungsten halogen bulbs have several significant limitations. First, they are not stable and emitted flux varies significantly in time. Second, they are characterized by short life time. Third, due to significant temporal inertia it is necessary to use mechanical shutters to enable tests of temporal characteristics of image intensifier tubes (II tubes). Sensitivity of image intensifier tubes depends significantly on wavelength. Therefore, illumination of the photocathode with 2856K color temperature light is not equivalent to illumination with monochromatic light of the same radiation power. However, let us analyze if properly calibrated monochromatic sources can replace 2856K color temperature halogen bulbs in test equipment to be used for testing image intensifier tubes and if accurate measurement of photometric parameters of II tubes is still possible. Quantitative relationships between input illuminance and output luminance is measured during the photometric tests of II tubes. The MIL standards state very precisely the necessary illuminance levels of 2856K color radiation to be used during measurement of photometric parameters of II tubes. The conversion coefficient between the illuminance level of 2856K light and the equivalent illuminance level of monochromatic light depends on spectral sensitivity curve of the tested tube that can vary with different tubes. Therefore we should use different conversion coefficients in order to calibrate properly the monochromatic source used during tests of tubes of different spectral sensitivity. * E-mail: kch@inframet.pl This feature is a significant drawback of semiconductor light sources but still in case of testing large number of II tubes of the same spectral sensitivity such monochromatic sources should be an interesting alternative of typical halogen bulbs. Here we will analyze possible application of monochromatic semiconductor sources (LED diodes) in testing of image intensifier tubes. These monochromatic sources are much more stable, are characterized by negligible temporal inertia and do not cause polychromatic aberration. Such sources are used sometimes in commercially available stations for testing II tubes [1.a.i.[7],1.a.i.[8]]. However, so far their applications have been limited to use in measurements of imaging parameters (resolution, MTF, image quality etc) of II tubes when, according to MIL standards, requirements on accuracy of illumination level are low. Here we are to investigate if it is possible to use semiconductor light sources in testing photometric parameters of II tubes (luminous sensitivity, luminance gain, etc) when requirements on accuracy of illumination level are high. In order to calibrate properly monochromatic source to be used instead of standard polychromatic light sources we will need an instrument that is sensitive to both polychromatic and monochromatic light. Let us make an assumption that we will use typical illuminance meters of spectral characteristics identical as spectral characteristics of humans eye as the sensing instrument of both polychromatic and monochromatic illumination at tube photocathode plane. The illuminace meters of sensitivity over 1 mlx are relatively low cost meters available at photometric laboratories. Next, let as assume that we will use a monochromatic source emitting light in the spectral range where both the tested II tubes and the illuminance meters are sensitive: from about 0.5 μm to 0.65μm. Krzysztof Chrzanowski, *1,2 Tomasz Raźniewski, Bartłomiej Radzik Military University of Technology, 2 Kaliski str., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland, Inframet, Graniczna 24, Kwirynow, 05-082 Stare Babice, Poland Received April 28, 2009; accepted June 29, 2009; published June 30, 2009 http://www.photonics.pl/PLP © 2009 Photonics Society of Poland PHOTONICS LETTERS OF POLAND, VOL. 1 (2), 79-81 (2009) 80 Now, let us analyse a situation when the photocathode of the image intensifier tube was illuminated using polychromatic 2856 K light and the illuminance meter recorded illuminance level Ep, and when the photocathode of the image intensifier tube was illuminated using monochromatic light the illuminance meter recorded illuminance level Em. Let us find what is the relationship between Ep and Em necessary to achieve situation when both light sources generate the same luminance level at the screen of the illuminated II tube. The light coming to the photocathode represent a certain stimulus that is measured by the illuminance meter in photometric units perfectly suitable for humans eye. Here however, let us analyse a case when the receptor of this stimulus is not human eye but image intensifier tube of significantly different spectral curve. If we use a light meter of spectral curve identical as tube curve then the corrected indication of the illuminace meter illuminated using polychromatic light Ep(cor) would be

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 as a Biomarker of Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 as a Potent Predictor of Long-Term Mortality among Subjects with Osteoarthritis

Monochromatic light sources in testing image intensifier tubes

Associations Between Elevated Growth Differentiation Factor-15 and Sarcopenia Among Community-dwelling Older Adults

Growth differentiation factor-15 and 5-years cardiovascular risk in chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department: a multicenter cohort study

Growth differentiation factor–15 predicts the prognoses of patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Predicts All-Cause Morbidity and Mortality in Stable Coronary Heart Disease

Growth Differentiation Factor 15, Its 12-Month Relative Change, and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Total Mortality in Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease: 10-Year Follow-up of the KAROLA Study

Growth Differentiation Factor 15: A Prognostic Marker in Patients with Acute Chest Pain without Acute Myocardial Infarction

Agricultural research. Consortium aims to supercharge rice photosynthesis.

Growth differentiation factor-15 predicts all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 is a Biomarker for All-cause Mortality but Less Evident for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Prospective Study

Growth differentiation factor-15 as a biomarker of coronary microvascular dysfunction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Raltegravir, Etravirine, and Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir: A Safe and Successful Rescue Regimen for Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection

Growth differentiation factor-15 as a negative predictor for microvascular obstruction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Growth differentiation factor 15 is a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer

The impact of growth differentiation factor 15 on the risk of cardiovascular diseases: two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Association between growth differentiation factor-15 and adverse outcomes among patients with heart failure: A systematic literature review

Prognostic value of growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 and the Subsequent Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Susceptibility to killing by bcg‐activated macrophages associated with ‘spontaneous’ neoplastic transformation in culture