Facial emotion recognition and judgment of affective scenes in Parkinson's disease

Federico Salfi,Stefano Toro,Gennaro Saporito,Patrizia Sucapane,Massimo Marano,Gianluca Montaruli,Angelo Cacchio,Michele Ferrara,Francesca Pistoia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32947
IF: 3.776
2024-06-13
Heliyon
Abstract:Emotional dysfunctions in Parkinson's disease (PD) remain a controversial issue. While previous investigations showed compromised recognition of expressive faces in PD, no studies evaluated potential deficits in recognizing the emotional valence of affective scenes. This study aimed to investigate both facial emotion recognition performance and the ability to judge affective scenes in PD patients. Forty PD patients (mean age ± SD: 64.50 ± 8.19 years; 27 men) and forty healthy subjects (64.95 ± 8.25 years; 27 men) were included. Exclusion criteria were previous psychiatric disorders, previous Deep Brain Stimulation, and cognitive impairment. Participants were evaluated through the Ekman 60-Faces test and the International Affective Picture System. The accuracy in recognizing the emotional valence of facial expressions and affective scenes was compared between groups using linear mixed models. Pearson's correlation was performed to test the association between accuracy measures. The groups did not differ in sex, age, education, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Patients showed a lower recognition accuracy of facial expressions (68.54 % ± 15.83 %) than healthy participants (78.67 % ± 12.04 %; p < 0.001). Specifically, the PD group was characterized by lower recognition of faces expressing fear, sadness, and anger than the control group (all p < 0.020). No difference was detected for faces expressing disgust, surprise, and happiness (all p ≥ 0.25). Furthermore, patients showed lower accuracy in recognizing the emotional valence of affective scenes (66.75 % ± 14.59 %) than healthy subjects (74.83 % ± 12.65 %; p = 0.010). Pearson's correlations indicated that higher accuracy in recognizing the emotional facial expressions was associated with higher accuracy in classifying the valence of affective scenes in patients (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and control participants (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Our study suggested maladaptive affective processing in PD, leading patients to misinterpret both facial expressions and the emotional valence of complex evocative scenes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?