Oncogenic Alterations Detected by Droplet Digital PCR in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Resistant to Cetuximab
Rujiao Liu,Zhi-Yu Chen,Weijian Guo,Xiaodong Zhu,Mingzhu Huang,Wen Zhang,Xiaoying Zhao,Lixin Qiu,Xiaowei Zhang,Zhe Zhang,Chenchen Wang,Wenhua Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.575
IF: 45.3
2019-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:575 Background: Anti-EGFR therapy is the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS and BRAF genes wild type (wt). Secondary alterations of several genes have been identified as possibly resistant mechanisms to EGFR blockade, these including mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MEK and EGFR ectodomain, as well as amplifications of HER2 and c-MET. In this study, we investigated alterations of these targeted genes for mCRC patients with acquired resistance to cetuximab treatment by using non-invasive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method within circulating DNA. Methods: We enrolled 38 RAS and BRAF wt patients, who progressed after failure of cetuximab contained regimens between Jul 2015 and Jan 2018. Plasma samples from all 38 patients were collected and detected for seven candidates (mutation of KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, BRAF, MEK, amplification of HER2, c-MET) by using ddPCR at the time of baseline, each evaluation by interval of 2 months and documented progression. All clinical parameters were collected simultaneously. Results: A total of 23 secondary alterations were found in 17 (17/38,44.7%) cetuximab resistant patients. The targeted gene alterations were detected as follows: 9 (9/23,39%) RAS mutations, 5 (22%) HER2 amplifications, 5 (22%) EGFR mutations, 2 (9%) c-MET amplifications, 1 (4%) BRAF and 1 MEK mutation. Among 17 patients, 6 patients had multiple alterations, including 2 patients with KRAS+EGFR mutations, 2 patients with HER2+c-MET co-amplifications and 2 patients with KRAS gene exon 2 and 3 multiple mutations. Primary sites were 15 left sides and 2 right sides, descending colon (12 cases) was the most common origins. Eleven patients were synchronous disease. Twelve patients received cetuximab as first line therapy, whereas 5 patients in the ≥ 2nd line setting. All of these 17 patients, plasma levels of oncogenic alterations detected by ddPCR were showed dynamic changing and good agreement with tumor responding status. Conclusions: Oncogenic alterations detected by ddPCR were found in almost half mCRC patients resistant to cetuximab. Dynamic changes of specific alteration may facilitate making decisions for selection of anti-EGFR mAb during the treatment course.