Abstract:Introduction Traditionally, to determine a length on a limb radiograph after total hip arthroplasty (THA), calibration is performed manually with the diameter of a ball or the femoral head. More recently, the development of EOS with automatic calibration has called into question the usefulness of manual calibration to highlight lower limb length inequality (LLLI). However, the validation of EOS with automatic calibration without landmarks to measure length inequalities on large images has not been verified against manual measurements on calibrated radiographs (conventional method), which motivated the present work. Hypothesis EOS is more accurate and reproducible from one reader to another in highlighting LLLI after THA than the classic method. Patients and methods One hundred and ten patients included underwent primary THA surgery in 2 centers, with postoperative EOS performed. This EOS was extracted in 2 formats: a DICOM file with automatic calibration and an uncalibrated JPEG file (220 radiographic files in total).Two readers, without knowledge of the clinical data, each analyzed all of these images using 2 methods: by measuring the distance between the center of the femoral head and the center of the mortise on the operated side and the non-operated side on the DICOM file, therefore via the software integrated into the EOS image (method 1), or by measuring these same distances on the JPEG file by calibrating the measurement to the diameter of the prosthetic head (method 2). The reproducibility of the measurements from one reader to another (inter-observer reproducibility) and the agreement of the measurements between the 2 methods (inter-method agreement) were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland- Altman graphic method. Results Inter-method agreement was satisfactory regardless of the reader but with a significantly higher agreement for reader 1 (inter-method agreement for reader 1: CL1 = 0.95 and for reader 2: CL2 = 0.90 (p = 0.008)) and this result was also confirmed by the Bland-Altman plot with no bias tendency for each reader and less than 5% of measurements that were outside the agreement band. Inter-observer reproducibility for method 1 was better than that for method 2 to highlight an LLLI after THA according to the CCI. Inter-observer reproducibility for method 1 (RM1) was 0.96 and 0.92 for method 2 (RM2) (p = 0.009). This result was confirmed by the Bland-Altman plot with a mean difference of less than 1 mm for each of the methods (−0.2 (standard deviation = 2.23) and 0.81 (3.03) for method 1 and method 2 respectively). Discussion Our hypothesis has therefore been partially verified. The use of the calibrated software integrated into the EOS system and manual calibration are two valid methods for searching for an LLLI. The measurements remain more reproducible from one reader to another with the calibrated software integrated into the EOS system. Level of evidence III; non-randomized prospective comparative study.

Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: preoperative and intraoperative management

Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: postoperative management

An Intraoperative Method to Minimize Leg Length Discrepancy in Anterior Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty—A Prospective Study

Comparative Study of Alternative Methods for Measuring Leg Length Discrepancy after Robot-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

[A New Method of Measuring Leg Length Discrepancy on Radiograph in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Analyses and Prevention of Leg-Length Discrepancy During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Can we trust the accuracy of the automatic calibration of the EOS system to measure lower limb length inequality after total hip arthroplasty? Comparison of EOS versus manual measurement on 110 calibrated radiographs

Survey results from an international hip course: comparison between experts and non-experts on hip arthroscopy clinical practice and post-operative rehabilitation

Development and application of calibrated femoral canal file and corresponding femoral stem prosthesis based on the digital anatomy of the hip joint to reduce the leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty

Leg Length Discrepancy in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Not All Discrepancies Are Created Equal

Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate?

The Anterior Lateral Decubitus Intermuscolar and the Postero-Lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study

The influence in clinical results of lower limb length discrepancy following distal femoral osteotomy

Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty with Fluoroscopy to Mitigate the Risk of Complications in Patients with Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease

Total Hip Arthroplasty: Leg Length Discrepancy Affects Functional Outcomes and Patient’s Gait

Accuracy of Cup Placement Angle, Leg Lengthening, and Offset Measurement Using an AR-Based Portable Navigation System: Validation in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Positions for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Computer-assisted femoral head reduction osteotomies: an approach for anatomic reconstruction of severely deformed Legg-Calvé-Perthes hips. A pilot study of six patients

The management of Legg-Calvé-Perthes' disease: is there a consensus? : A study of clinical practice preferred by the members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society

Equalisation of Leg Lengths in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients with Crowe Type-Iv Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

The Impact of Leg Length and Offset Change on Dislocation Risk Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Fluoroscopy-Assisted Computer Navigation Accurately Determines Cup Position and Leg Length for Anterior Hip Arthroplasty