Ovarian function in female survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma

Lauren Jimenez-Kurlander,Amelia DeRosa,Caroline E Kostrzewa,Chaya S Moskowitz,Kimberly Bogardus,Zoltan Antal,Suzanne Wolden,Michael P La Quaglia,Ellen M Basu,Fiorella Iglesias Cardenas,Kim Kramer,Brian H Kushner,Nai-Kong V Cheung,Shakeel Modak,Danielle Novetsky Friedman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31181
Abstract:Introduction: Data on ovarian function in neuroblastoma survivors are limited. We sought to determine the prevalence of ovarian dysfunction in a cohort of high-risk neuroblastoma survivors and compare outcomes among survivors treated with and without autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) preceded by myeloablative chemotherapy. Methods: Retrospective review of female survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma ≥5 years from diagnosis, diagnosed between 1982 and 2014, and followed in a tertiary cancer center. Participants were divided into two groups: individuals treated with conventional chemotherapy ± radiation ("non-ASCR") (n = 32) or with chemotherapy ± radiation followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with ASCR ("ASCR") (n = 51). Ovarian dysfunction was defined as follicle-stimulating hormone ≥15 mU/mL, while premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) was defined as persistent ovarian dysfunction requiring hormone replacement therapy. Poisson models were used to determine prevalence ratios of ovarian dysfunction and POI. Results: Among 83 females (median attained age: 19 years [range, 10-36]; median follow-up: 15 years [range, 7-36]), 49 (59%) had ovarian dysfunction, and 34 (41%) developed POI. Survivors treated with ASCR were 3.2-fold more likely to develop ovarian dysfunction (95% CI: 1.8-6.0; p < 0.001) and 4.5-fold more likely to develop POI (95% CI: 1.7-11.7; p = 0.002) when compared with those treated with conventional chemotherapy, after adjusting for attained age. Two participants in the non-ASCR group and six in the ASCR group achieved at least one spontaneous pregnancy. Discussion: Ovarian dysfunction is prevalent in female high-risk neuroblastoma survivors, especially after ASCR. Longitudinal follow-up of larger cohorts is needed to inform counseling about the risk of impaired ovarian function after neuroblastoma therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?