Pregnant women's perceptions on Information Sources on Zika Virus: a qualitative study

Priscila Cardia Petra,Elena Marbán-Castro,Gustavo Matta,Claudia Milena Hormiga Sánchez,Camila Pimentel,Gabriela Lopes Gama,Adriana Melo,Marcela Daza,Angelica María Amado,Maria Consuelo Miranda Montoya,Lauren Maxwell,Edna Acosta Pérez,Marcela Mercado,Ester Paiva

Abstract:The Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic had a sanitary, psychosocial, and economic impact on individuals of reproductive age. The primary concern revolved around infection during pregnancy due to possible vertical transmission and its association with adverse fetal and infant outcomes, known as Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS). This qualitative study employs phenomenology and grounded theory. This study includes interviews with 98 women, some pregnant during the ZIKV epidemic in Brazil, Colombia, and Puerto Rico, who had children with CZS or without diagnosed neurological impairment. Additionally, the study included a group of women who were pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic in these same countries. In both groups, interviewees had varying levels of knowledge about ZIKV. The study found that messages conveyed through the media tended to be alarmist, in contrast to the information provided by healthcare professionals, which was considered more trustworthy. Pregnant women during the ZIKV epidemic reported receiving their ZIKV and CSZ infection diagnoses late, either during or after childbirth. The study underscores the needs of pregnant women in high-risk scenarios, the importance of health education processes, and the necessity to reinforce communication and continuing education.