Abstract:Abstract Background/Aims In the UK, people living with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) will see their rheumatology team once a year, or less during routine clinical practice. Providing patients with the knowledge, tools and resources to confidently self-manage their condition is therefore an important component of patient care. The 2022 NICE Impact Arthritis report indicates that education and non-pharmacological treatment is lacking, making long-term self-management difficult for patients. Development of effective self-management interventions requires a deep understanding of the psychosocial context of people living with axSpA and the challenges they face when managing the practical, physical and psychological impacts of axSpA. This study therefore aimed to collect rich qualitative data from people living with axSpA to understand their experiences living with and managing their condition. Methods Online surveys were designed in alignment with guidance from Braun et al., (2021), regarding online surveys as a qualitative research tool. Open-ended questions were prioritised to collect rich qualitative data. Surveys were distributed via patient organisations and Twitter. Responses were collected via the Jisc online surveys platform from July 2022-January 2023. Results were interpreted using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Results Data were collected from 30 axSpA participants, with varying durations of diagnosis (<1 year to > 20 years). 70% of respondents were female, and all participants were aged 25-84 years. Over half (63.3%) had experienced symptoms for ≥10 years before diagnosis. Three themes were generated from the qualitative data. Theme 1) Personalised, flexible approach: AxSpA is a heterogenous, fluctuating, unpredictable condition, thus requiring a personalised, flexible approach to self-management. Optimal self-management requires a deep understanding and acceptance of one’s own condition and symptoms, to effectively self-regulate emotions and behaviour and communicate changing needs in response to fluctuating symptoms. Theme 2) Making the invisible, visible: people living with axSpA often have no visible disability, and can struggle to feel seen and believed, especially if experiencing diagnostic delay and lacking education about axSpA. Feeling supported, believed and understood is critical for disease acceptance and feeling confident and able to engage with positive health behaviours and communicate needs, versus isolation, inner conflict, guilt and suffering through a “personal world of pain”. Theme 3) Coping with fatigue and pain: fatigue and pain are the most challenging aspects of the condition to manage, due to their unpredictability and impact on emotional resilience, autonomy, and motivation or ability to perform self-care behaviours. Conclusion Optimal self-management in axSpA requires early diagnosis, education and reassurance from healthcare professionals, including guidance for communicating with friends, family and colleagues about axSpA, and signposting to patient organisations/communities. Self-management interventions should target fatigue, pain and disease acceptance, and support patients to gain a deep understanding of their own condition to identify personalised, flexible self-care strategies that work for them. Disclosure R. Barnett: None. C. Clarke: None. R. Sengupta: Honoraria; RS has received honoraria from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this abstract. P. Rouse: None.

Management of refractory disease and persistent symptoms in inflammatory arthritis: qualitative framework analysis of interviews with patients and healthcare professionals

Understanding the psychosocial determinants of effective disease management in rheumatoid arthritis to prevent persistently active disease: a qualitative study

Refractory inflammatory arthritis definition and model generated through patient and multi-disciplinary professional modified Delphi process

Patient Perspectives on the Challenges and Responsibilities of Living With Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Qualitative Study

P169 Optimising self-management in axial spondyloarthritis: a qualitative exploration of patient perspectives

Summarizing current refractory disease definitions in rheumatoid arthritis and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: systematic review

Persistent inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms in refractory rheumatoid arthritis

Understanding Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications for a Therapeutic Approach

Implementing a patient-initiated review system in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative evaluation

Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study

Patient and Rheumatologist Perspectives Regarding Challenges to Achieving Optimal Disease Control in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Patients and relatives coping with inflammatory arthritis: Care teamwork

The role of patient reported symptom data in co‐producing meaning in rheumatoid arthritis

Patient perspectives on the unwanted effects of multidisciplinary pain management programmes: A qualitative study

Chronic rhinosinusitis: a qualitative study of patient views and experiences of current management in primary and secondary care

Tailoring the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases by a better stratification and characterization of the clinical patient heterogeneity. Findings from a systematic literature review and experts' consensus

Management strategies in rheumatoid arthritis

Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Focus group interviews reveal reasons for differences in the perception of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: an area of unmet clinical need

EULAR points to consider for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis