Risk of neutropenia in psoriasis patients prescribed anti-IL-23 antibody in comparison with anti-IL-17 antibody or adalimumab based on real-world data from the MID-NET® in Japan

Yusuke Okada,Kazuhiro Kajiyama,Chieko Ishiguro,Takahiro Nonaka,Tomomi Komaki,Wataru Kuga,Noriyuki Komiyama,Toyotaka Iguchi,Naoya Horiuchi,Yoshiaki Uyama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2373826

Abstract:Background: To evaluate the risk of neutropenia during treatment with anti-IL-23 antibodies in patients with psoriasis. Method: We conducted an observational study with cohort design using MID-NET® in Japan. We identified patients with psoriasis who were newly prescribed anti-IL-23 antibodies, anti-IL-17-antibodies, adalimumab, or apremilast between January 1, 2009, and March 31, 2021. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of anti-IL-23 antibodies compared to that of anti-IL-17 antibodies, adalimumab, or apremilast, for the risk of grade 2 (neutrophil count < 1,500/μL) or grade 3 (neutrophil count < 1,000/μL) neutropenia. Results: Overall, 287 patients on anti-IL-23 antibodies, 189 patients on anti-IL-17 antibodies, 293 patients on adalimumab, and 540 patients on apremilast were included. Compared with anti-IL-17 antibodies, the aHR (95% confidence interval (CI)) of anti-IL-23 antibodies was 0.83 (0.27-2.51) for grade 2 and 0.40 (0.02-7.60) for grade 3 neutropenia; that when compared with adalimumab was 0.76 (0.28-2.06) for grade 2 but was not calculated for grade 3 as no cases were found; and that compared with apremilast was 3.88 (0.62-24.48) for grade 2 and 0.43 (0.02-11.63) for grade 3 neutropenia. Conclusion: No clear increase in the risk of neutropenia with anti-IL-23 antibodies was observed.