TBC1D4 antagonizes RAB2A-mediated autophagic and endocytic pathways

Rui Tian,Pengwei Zhao,Xianming Ding,Xinyi Wang,Xiao Jiang,Shuai Chen,Zhijian Cai,Lin Li,She Chen,Wei Liu,Qiming Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2024.2367907
IF: 13.391
2024-07-04
Autophagy
Abstract:Macroautophagic/autophagic and endocytic pathways play essential roles in maintaining homeostasis at different levels. It remains poorly understood how both pathways are coordinated and fine-tuned for proper lysosomal degradation of diverse cargoes. We and others recently identified a Golgi-resident RAB GTPase, RAB2A, as a positive regulator that controls both autophagic and endocytic pathways. In the current study, we report that TBC1D4 (TBC1 domain family member 4), a TBC domain-containing protein that plays essential roles in glucose homeostasis, suppresses RAB2A-mediated autophagic and endocytic pathways. TBC1D4 bound to RAB2A through its N-terminal PTB2 domain, which impaired RAB2A-mediated autophagy at the early stage by preventing ULK1 complex activation. During the late stage of autophagy, TBC1D4 impeded the association of RUBCNL/PACER and RAB2A with STX17 on autophagosomes by direct interaction with RUBCNL via its N-terminal PTB1 domain. Disruption of the autophagosomal trimeric complex containing RAB2A, RUBCNL and STX17 resulted in defective HOPS recruitment and eventually abortive autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Furthermore, TBC1D4 inhibited RAB2A-mediated endocytic degradation independent of RUBCNL. Therefore, TBC1D4 and RAB2A form a dual molecular switch to modulate autophagic and endocytic pathways. Importantly, hepatocyte- or adipocyte-specific tbc1d4 knockout in mice led to elevated autophagic flux and endocytic degradation and tissue damage. Together, this work establishes TBC1D4 as a critical molecular brake in autophagic and endocytic pathways, providing further mechanistic insights into how these pathways are intertwined both in vitro and in vivo.Abbreviations: ACTB: actin beta; ATG9: autophagy related 9; ATG14: autophagy related 14; ATG16L1: autophagy related 16 like 1; CLEM: correlative light electron microscopy; Ctrl: control; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; EGF: epidermal growth factor; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; FL: full length; GAP: GTPase-activating protein; GFP: green fluorescent protein; HOPS: homotypic fusion and protein sorting; IP: immunoprecipitation; KD: knockdown; KO: knockout; LAMP1: lysosomal associated membrane protein 1; MAP1LC3B/LC3B: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta; OE: overexpression; PG: phagophore; PtdIns3K: class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; SLC2A4/GLUT4: solute carrier family 2 member 4; SQSTM1/p62: sequestosome 1; RUBCNL/PACER: rubicon like autophagy enhancer; STX17: syntaxin 17; TAP: tandem affinity purification; TBA: total bile acid; TBC1D4: TBC1 domain family member 4; TUBA1B: tubulin alpha 1b; ULK1: unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1; VPS39: VPS39 subunit of HOPS complex; WB: western blot; WT: wild type.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?