Machine Learning–Based Perivascular Space Volumetry in Alzheimer Disease
Katerina Deike,Andreas Decker,Paul Scheyhing,Julia Harten,Nadine Zimmermann,Daniel Paech,Oliver Peters,Silka D. Freiesleben,Luisa-Sophie Schneider,Lukas Preis,Josef Priller,Eike Spruth,Slawek Altenstein,Andrea Lohse,Klaus Fliessbach,Okka Kimmich,Jens Wiltfang,Claudia Bartels,Niels Hansen,Frank Jessen,Ayda Rostamzadeh,Emrah Düzel,Wenzel Glanz,Enise I. Incesoy,Michaela Butryn,Katharina Buerger,Daniel Janowitz,Michael Ewers,Robert Perneczky,Boris-Stephan Rauchmann,Stefan Teipel,Ingo Kilimann,Doreen Goerss,Christoph Laske,Matthias H. Munk,Annika Spottke,Nina Roy,Michael Wagner,Sandra Roeske,Michael T. Heneka,Frederic Brosseron,Alfredo Ramirez,Laura Dobisch,Steffen Wolfsgruber,Luca Kleineidam,Renat Yakupov,Melina Stark,Matthias C. Schmid,Moritz Berger,Stefan Hetzer,Peter Dechent,Klaus Scheffler,Gabor C. Petzold,Anja Schneider,Alexander Effland,Alexander Radbruch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000001077
IF: 6.7
2024-04-23
Investigative Radiology
Abstract:Objectives Impaired perivascular clearance has been suggested as a contributing factor to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). However, it remains unresolved when the anatomy of the perivascular space (PVS) is altered during AD progression. Therefore, this study investigates the association between PVS volume and AD progression in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals, both with and without subjective cognitive decline (SCD), and in those clinically diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild AD. Materials and Methods A convolutional neural network was trained using manually corrected, filter-based segmentations (n = 1000) to automatically segment the PVS in the centrum semiovale from interpolated, coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans (n = 894). These scans were sourced from the national German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Study. Convolutional neural network–based segmentations and those performed by a human rater were compared in terms of segmentation volume, identified PVS clusters, as well as Dice score. The comparison revealed good segmentation quality (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.70 with P < 0.0001 for PVS volume, detection rate in cluster analysis = 84.3%, and Dice score = 59.0%). Subsequent multivariate linear regression analysis, adjusted for participants' age, was performed to correlate PVS volume with clinical diagnoses, disease progression, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, lifestyle factors, and cognitive function. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Battery, and the Cognitive Subscale of the 13-Item Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale. Results Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, revealed that participants with AD and MCI, but not those with SCD, had significantly higher PVS volumes compared with CU participants without SCD ( P = 0.001 for each group). Furthermore, CU participants who developed incident MCI within 4.5 years after the baseline assessment showed significantly higher PVS volumes at baseline compared with those who did not progress to MCI ( P = 0.03). Cognitive function was negatively correlated with PVS volume across all participant groups ( P ≤ 0.005 for each). No significant correlation was found between PVS volume and any of the following parameters: cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, sleep quality, body mass index, nicotine consumption, or alcohol abuse. Conclusions The very early changes of PVS volume may suggest that alterations in PVS function are involved in the pathophysiology of AD. Overall, the volumetric assessment of centrum semiovale PVS represents a very early imaging biomarker for AD.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging