Physician-Owned Hospitals, Neurosurgeons, and Disclosure: Lessons From Law and the Literature

M. Babu,J. Rosenow,B. Nahed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821144ff
IF: 5.315
2011-06-01
Neurosurgery
Abstract:Physician ownership of hospitals has been a subject of controversy for years. Opponents claim that physician ownership and the hospital profits that result from imaging, laboratory tests, and procedures create a conflict of interest for physicians in providing impartial patient care. Proponents argue that having an ownership stake in a hospital means that physicians can have control over all facets of the patient experience, which leads potentially to better patient satisfaction and outcomes. With passage of health reform legislation, physician-owned specialty hospitals have been under renewed attack and now face more restrictive limitations on their growth and expansion. The following review explores the history of physician-owned specialty hospitals, the controversy surrounding physician ownership, and the scope of neurosurgeon ownership in specialty hospitals and offers 2 models for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?