Abstract:BackgroundOral anticancer drugs show a high interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK). Even though exposure has been linked to efficacy and toxicity for many of these drugs, they are still dosed using a one-size-fits-all approach. Consequently, individual patients (pts) have a high probability to be either underdosed or overdosed, potentially leading to decreased antitumor efficacy or increased toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which is personalised dosing based on measured drug levels, can be used to address these problems and thereby optimize treatment outcomes.MethodsThis prospective clinical study (www.trialregister.nl, NL6695) evaluates the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of TDM of oral anticancer drugs. In total, 600 pts will be included for 23 different drugs. Pts starting regular treatment with one of these drugs at the approved dose are included. PK sampling is performed 4, 8, and 12 weeks after start of treatment and every 12 weeks thereafter. Drug concentrations are measured and trough concentrations (Cmin) are estimated. In case of Cmin below the predefined target and acceptable toxicity, a PK-guided intervention is recommended. This may include emphasizing compliance, adaptations in concomitant medication (due to drug-drug interactions), concomitant intake with food, splitting intake moments or dose increments.ResultsIn total, 274 pts were included (trametinib (n = 43), abiraterone (n = 38), enzalutamide (n = 35), imatinib (n = 33), pazopanib (n = 23), other (n = 102)), of whom 246 pts had available PK data. 83 pts (34%) were underdosed and had ≥ 1 PK samples below the predefined target. In 48 of 246 pts (20%) a PK-guided intervention was performed, which was successful (i.e. target attainment without additional toxicities) in 39 pts (81%). In 35 pts, a PK-guided intervention could not be performed, due to toxicity (17 pts), logistical reasons (13 pts) or lack of physician adherence (5 pts).ConclusionsThis prospective study shows that PK-guided dose optimization of oral anticancer drugs is feasible in clinical practice. A PK-guided intervention was recommended in 20% of the patients and resulted in target attainment without additional toxicities in 81% of these patients.Clinical trial identificationNL6695; release date: 6 December 2017.Legal entity responsible for the studyNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital.FundingUnrestricted research grant of Novartis, Pfizer and Roche.DisclosureS.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. D.J.A.R. Moes: Advisory / Consultancy: Sandoz; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Chiesi Pharmaceuticals. I.M.E. Desar: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai. D.J. Touw: Advisory / Consultancy: Sanguin; Research grant / Funding (institution): Chiesi Pharmaceuticals. N.P. van Erp: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Gilead. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution): Servier. N. Steeghs: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Blueprint Medicines; Research grant / Funding (institution): AB Science; Research grant / Funding (institution): Deciphera; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / -Abstract Truncated-

Evaluation of adherence to abiraterone therapy in prostate cancer patients based on a population pharmacokinetic model

Unraveling Complexities in the Absorption and Disposition Kinetics of Abiraterone via Iterative PBPK Model Development and Refinement

Comparison of out-of-pocket costs and adherence between the two arms of the prospective, randomized abiraterone food effect trial

Therapeutic adherence of patients with breast and prostate cancers

Population Pharmacokinetics of Trametinib and Impact of Nonadherence on Drug Exposure in Oncology Patients as Part of the Optimizing Oral Targeted Anticancer Therapies Study

Nonadherence to medications for chronic conditions and risk of nonadherence to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) in patients with prostate cancer.

Characterization and prediction of OATP1B activity in prostate cancer patients on abiraterone acetate using endogenous biomarker coproporphyrin I

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: An Open, Randomized, Single-Dose, Three-Period, Three-Sequence Crossover Study

Adverse Drug Reactions and Predictors of Medication Adherence in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Abiraterone Acetate for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer after Docetaxel Failure: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Bridging Study

Identification of non-adherence to adjuvant letrozole using a population pharmacokinetics approach in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients

The impact of a pharmacist-led oral anticancer clinic on medication adherence and laboratory monitoring

The effect of tumor composition on the success of adaptive therapy: The case of metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Phase II therapeutic equivalence study of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets (I) vs. ZYTIGA (R) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Simultaneous determination of abiraterone and its five metabolites in human plasma by LC-MS/MS: Application to pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese subjects

Modified monitoring of abiraterone acetate-induced hepatotoxicity in prostate cancer patients

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral anticancer drugs - preliminary results of a prospective study

Long-Term Pharmacokinetic Follow-Up of Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Phase II therapeutic equivalence study of Abiraterone Acetate Tablets (I) vs. ZYTIGA ® in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Abstract PS04-08: Sociodemographic Risk Factors and Prediction of Aromatase Inhibitor Non-Adherence in Women with Breast Cancer Enrolled in SWOG S1105

Novel approach to adherence assessment based on parent drug and metabolite pharmacokinetics: pilot study with spironolactone