Abstract:Conventional observational epidemiology has an unenviable reputation for generating false-positive findings, or “scares,” as others call them. In 1993, for example, the New York Times reported that “vitamin E greatly reduces the risk of heart disease” following simultaneous publication of 2 observational studies in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrating that use of vitamin E supplements, even for just a few years, was associated with a substantially lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)—testing precisely the same hypothesis—revealed no reduction in risk at all. As I write this, UK news media are reporting that “junk food makes your kids dumb,” in response to a paper reporting that children given a poor diet at age 3 had lower IQ scores 5 years later. In the latter case, however, no RCTs are ever likely to be carried out, and the status of the finding will remain liminal. The ratio of false-positive to false-negative (FP:FN) published findings in traditional epidemiology is very high, John Ioannidis and colleagues argue. But what exactly are “false-positive” findings in the context of conventional observational epidemiology, and how can their prevalence be quantified? My suspicion is that use of vitamin E supplements would—in most contexts—be associated with lower risk of CHD, because of substantial confounding by a myriad of measured and unmeasured factors related to such a socially and behaviorally patterned exposure. The same will apply to children fed on junk food and their later intelligence. The inability to substantially “control” statistically for confounding in many situations—due to measurement error in assessed confounders and omission of others—remains underappreciated. In the sense that these associations do exist, they should perhaps not be called false positives; they are false positives only if they are taken to be indicators of underlying causal effects. Noncausal but replicable observational associations could clearly be of considerable value through prediction of disease risk, and targeting of preventive measures to those who can benefit most. For the holy grail of epidemiology—identifying causes of disease—they are a disappointment, however. A wide range of approaches—from formally comparing associations in contexts where confounding structures differ, utilizing correlates of the exposure under study that are not plausible causes and natural experiments, through to formal instrumental variables methods—offer greater hope for reliable causal inference than plowing on with traditional approaches and keeping the FP:FN ratio high. Ioannidis and colleagues reiterate the low positive predictive value of a nominally “significant” P, something I (along with a generation of epidemiologists, I imagine) first encountered in Michael Oakes’ seminal “Statistical Inference, although (as has been

Therapeutic effect of oregano essential oil on subclinical bovine mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli

The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with Mercedes incision

A Gustilo type IIIB open forearm fracture treated by negative pressure wound therapy and locking compression plates: a case report.

Nefopam as a multimodal analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Random allocation in observational data: how small but robust effects could facilitate hypothesis-free causal inference.

Images in cardiology. Visualising fatty deposits in familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy by magnetic resonance imaging.

Periprocedural analgesic efficacy of a single, pre-emptive administration of propacetamol in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Comparison of Monotherapy Versus Combination of Intravenous Ibuprofen and Propacetamol (Acetaminophen) for Reduction of Postoperative Opioid Administration in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of analgesic efficacy between rectus sheath blockade, intrathecal morphine with bupivacaine, and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective, observational clinical study

Evaluation of Intravenous Parecoxib Infusion Pump of Patient-Controlled Analgesia Compared to Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Management in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Anterior quadratus lumborum block provided superior pain control and reduced opioid consumption in kidney transplantation: A randomized controlled trial

Female patients and practitioners in medieval Islam

Nalbuphine Versus Ketorolac as an Adjuvant to Local Wound Infiltration Anesthesia in Open Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

The systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of nefopam for catheter-related bladder discomfort based on randomized controlled trials

Role of Intrathecal Morphine for Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Effect of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

The Effects of Ropivacaine Combined with Dexmedetomidine for Target Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Blocks by Multiple Injections for Preemptive Analgesia on Postoperative Analgesia of Patients of Pulmonary Cancer Undergoing Thoracotomy

Patient-controlled Analgesia With Propacetamol-Fentanyl Mixture for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in High-risk Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Continuous flow local anesthetic wound infusion for post‐operative analgesia following kidney transplantation

Comparison of intrathecal morphine versus erector spinae block for postoperative analgesia in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing kidney transplantation: A randomised clinical study

Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects Between Ultrasound-Guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Patients: A Randomized, Controlled, and Noninferiority Study