Abstract:Background We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of deep learning radiomics (DLR) and hand-crafted radiomics (HCR) features in differentiating acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Methods A total of 365 patients with VCFs were retrospectively analysed based on their computed tomography (CT) scan data. All patients completed MRI examination within 2 weeks. There were 315 acute VCFs and 205 chronic VCFs. Deep transfer learning (DTL) features and HCR features were extracted from CT images of patients with VCFs using DLR and traditional radiomics, respectively, and feature fusion was performed to establish the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The MRI display of vertebral bone marrow oedema was used as the gold standard for acute VCF, and the model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC).To separately evaluate the effectiveness of DLR, traditional radiomics and feature fusion in the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic VCFs, we constructed a nomogram based on the clinical baseline data to visualize the classification evaluation. The predictive power of each model was compared using the Delong test, and the clinical value of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Results Fifty DTL features were obtained from DLR, 41 HCR features were obtained from traditional radiomics, and 77 features fusion were obtained after feature screening and fusion of the two. The area under the curve (AUC) of the DLR model in the training cohort and test cohort were 0.992 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.983-0.999) and 0.871 (95% CI, 0.805-0.938), respectively. While the AUCs of the conventional radiomics model in the training cohort and test cohort were 0.973 (95% CI, 0.955-0.990) and 0.854 (95% CI, 0.773-0.934), respectively. The AUCs of the features fusion model in the training cohort and test cohort were 0.997 (95% CI, 0.994-0.999) and 0.915 (95% CI, 0.855-0.974), respectively. The AUCs of nomogram constructed by the features fusion in combination with clinical baseline data were 0.998 (95% CI, 0.996–0.999) and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.906–0.987) in the training cohort and test cohort, respectively. The Delong test showed that the differences between the features fusion model and the nomogram in the training cohort and the test cohort were not statistically significant ( P values were 0.794 and 0.668, respectively), and the differences in the other prediction models in the training cohort and the test cohort were statistically significant ( P < 0.05). DCA showed that the nomogram had high clinical value. Conclusion The features fusion model can be used for the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic VCFs, and its differential diagnosis ability is improved when compared with that when either radiomics is used alone. At the same time, the nomogram has a high predictive value for acute and chronic VCFs and can be a potential decision-making tool to assist clinicians, especially when a patient is unable to undergo spinal MRI examination.

Development and validation of a predictive model for vertebral fracture risk in osteoporosis patients

A Computed Tomography-based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Longitudinal Study.

Development and validation of a radiomics-based model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with lumbar compression fractures

Clinical Value of Machine Learning Models in Early Osteoporosis Prediction Based on Demographic and Routine Biochemical Indicators

Constructing a Deep Learning Radiomics Model Based on X-ray Images and Clinical Data for Predicting and Distinguishing Acute and Chronic Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Multicenter Study

Exploring deep learning radiomics for classifying osteoporotic vertebral fractures in X-ray images

Predicting Osteoporosis and Osteopenia by Fusing Deep Transfer Learning Features and Classical Radiomics Features Based on Single-Source Dual-energy CT Imaging

Predicting Secondary Vertebral Compression Fracture After Vertebral Augmentation via CT-Based Machine Learning Radiomics-Clinical Model

Fully Automatic Deep Learning Model for Spine Refracture in Patients with OVCF: A Multi-Center Study

A Computed Tomography–Based Fracture Prediction Model With Images of Vertebral Bones and Muscles by Employing Deep Learning: Development and Validation Study

Prediction of subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture on CT radiography via deep learning

Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans

Integration of Spinal Musculoskeletal System Parameters for Predicting OVCF in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Predictive Model.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on Plain Radiographs

A deep-learning system for automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at thoracolumbar junction using low-dose computed tomography images

Prediction of Subsequent Vertebral Fracture After Acute Osteoporotic Fractures from Clinical and Paraspinal Muscle Features

CT-based Radiomics Predicts Adjacent Vertebral Fracture after Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation

Differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures using conventional CT based on deep transfer learning features and hand-crafted radiomics features

Cover Picture: Prediction of subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture on CT radiography via deep learning (View 6/2022)

Construction and verification of risk prediction model of osteoporotic fractures in patients with osteoporosis in China

Development of a deep learning model for detecting lumbar vertebral fractures on CT images: An external validation