Serendipitous diagnosis of mild recessive multiple epiphyseal dysplasia through parental‐targeted screening test

Y. Lacassie,J. Storment,G. Lazarin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34306

2011-12-01

Abstract:Recessive multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (rMED) is a skeletal dysplasia associated with joint pain and deformity, short stature, and scoliosis. Although some individuals may present with mild symptoms, morbidity can be significant [Ballhausen et al., 2003]. The prevalence is estimated at approximately one in 20,000, though this may be an underestimation due to milder cases remaining undiagnosed [Unger et al., 2008]. Mutations in the sulfate transporter gene (DTDST/SLC26A2) cause rMED, in addition to other osteochondrodysplasias. High-throughput carrier screening (HTCS) via multiplex assay detects over 450 mutations causative of recessive disorders [Srinivasan et al., 2010]. Carrier screening, usually performed on prospective parents, are not generally used for the diagnosis of genetic abnormalities. However, in appropriate circumstances, screening can lead to diagnosis of a genetic disorder in the progeny of the screened couple. We report on a case in which a diagnosis of rMED was unexpectedly achieved by identifying parental rMED carriers via HTCS. The child was the first offspring of healthy, non-consanguineous Cajun parents. The father was 25 years old and the mother 33 years old at time of delivery. In both families there was the antecedent of a stillborn. Ultrasound at 21 WGA identified short long bones and left-sided hydronephrosis. Due to the increased risk for Down syndrome, the mother elected amniocentesis which showed a normal 46,XX karyotype. No further prenatal testing was performed. The baby was born full term via normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. BW was 3,390 g. and BL was 48 cm. At birth cleft palate, micrognathia, low-set and rotated ears, generalized redundant skin, questionable short extremities and bell-shaped chest were noticed. Early retinal hemorrhages, parietal bone fracture, and pneumothorax were also diagnosed. Repeated chromosome analysis again showed a normal female karyotype. Serum 7-dehydrocholesterol to rule out Smith–Lemli–Optiz syndrome was normal. Skeletal survey did not provide significant additional information. An isolated, non-syndromic, cleft palate was diagnosed and the etiology was presumed to be multifactorial. At age 3.5months, the childwas referred to our craniofacial team (Children’s Hospital, New Orleans, LA). Physical examination showed cleft palate, micrognathia, and flat facies. Other findings included six caf e-au-lait macules including a large one in the left gluteal area, circumferential creases in the arms, and tendency to central pocket loop in the left 2nd and 4th digits (Fig. 1a–c). The findings and antecedents were suggestive of a connective tissue disorder. A cleft-palate-targetedmicroarray (Craniofacial Genetics Research Laboratory, University of Iowa) was performed on the child and both parents and only showed a polymorphic duplication on chromosome 15. The child presented some hypotonia, walking at age 20 months, and rather poor growth below the 5th centile at age 2 years. At age 3 (Fig. 1d,e)we countedover 20 caf e-au-laitmacules andnoticedprepubic fat deposit, and a supernumerary tooth. No other signs of NF1 were noticed. Based onmajor andminor findings, a syndrome in identification with elusive etiology was again diagnosed. The child’s parents desired another pregnancy and were referred for routine fertility evaluation (Fertility and Women’s Health