Land in limbo: Nearly one third of Indonesia's cleared old-growth forests left idle

Diana Parker,Anna Tosiani,Muhammad Yazid,Inggit L Sari,Tatik Kartika,Kustiyo,Rizky Firmansyah,Zuraidah Said,Arief Wijaya,Peter Potapov,Alexandra Tyukavina,Stephen V Stehman,Viviana Zalles,Amy Pickens,Jeffrey Pickering,Svetlana Turubanova,Matthew C Hansen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318029121
2024-07-09
Abstract:Indonesia has experienced rapid primary forest loss, second only to Brazil in modern history. We examined the fates of Indonesian deforested areas, immediately after clearing and over time, to quantify deforestation drivers in Indonesia. Using time-series satellite data, we tracked degradation and clearing events in intact and degraded natural forests from 1991 to 2020, as well as land use trajectories after forest loss. While an estimated 7.8 Mha (SE = 0.4) of forest cleared during this period had been planted with oil palms by 2020, another 8.8 Mha (SE = 0.4) remained unused. Of the 28.4 Mha (SE = 0.7) deforested, over half were either initially left idle or experienced crop failure before a land use could be detected, and 44% remained unused for 5 y or more. A majority (54%) of these areas were cleared mechanically (not by escaped fires), and in cases where idle lands were eventually converted to productive uses, oil palm plantations were by far the most common outcome. The apparent deliberate creation of idle deforested land in Indonesia and subsequent conversion of idle areas to oil palm plantations indicates that speculation and land banking for palm oil substantially contribute to forest loss, although failed plantations could also contribute to this dynamic. We also found that in Sumatra, few lowland forests remained, suggesting that a lack of remaining forest appropriate for palm oil production, together with an extensive area of banked deforested land, may partially explain slowing forest loss in Indonesia in recent years.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?