DNA Diagnostics of Hereditary Hearing Loss: A Targeted Resequencing Approach Combined with a Mutation Classification System
Manou Sommen,Isabelle Schrauwen,Geert Vandeweyer,Nele Boeckx,Jason J Corneveaux,Jenneke van den Ende,An Boudewyns,Els De Leenheer,Sandra Janssens,Kathleen Claes,Margriet Verstreken,Nicola Strenzke,Friederike Predöhl,Wim Wuyts,Geert Mortier,Maria Bitner-Glindzicz,Tobias Moser,Paul Coucke,Matthew J Huentelman,Guy Van Camp,Jason J. Corneveaux,Matthew J. Huentelman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22999
2016-05-06
Human Mutation
Abstract:Although there are nearly 100 different causative genes identified for nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL), Sanger sequencing-based DNA diagnostics usually only analyses three, namely, GJB2, SLC26A4, and OTOF. As this is seen as inadequate, there is a need for high-throughput diagnostic methods to detect disease-causing variations, including single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), insertions/deletions (Indels), and copy-number variations (CNVs). In this study, a targeted resequencing panel for hearing loss was developed including 79 genes for NSHL and selected forms of syndromic hearing loss. One-hundred thirty one presumed autosomal-recessive NSHL (arNSHL) patients of Western-European ethnicity were analyzed for SNVs, Indels, and CNVs. In addition, we established a straightforward variant classification system to deal with the large number of variants encountered. We estimate that combining prescreening of GJB2 with our panel leads to a diagnosis in 25%-30% of patients. Our data show that after GJB2, the most commonly mutated genes in a Western-European population are TMC1, MYO15A, and MYO7A (3.1%). CNV analysis resulted in the identification of causative variants in two patients in OTOA and STRC. One of the major challenges for diagnostic gene panels is assigning pathogenicity for variants. A collaborative database collecting all identified variants from multiple centers could be a valuable resource for hearing loss diagnostics.
genetics & heredity