Abstract:LBA3559 Background: BRAF V600E mutations are present in 8-12% worldwide of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and linked with a poor prognosis. Encorafenib + cetuximab (E+C) was approved by the FDA and EMA for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC who received prior systemic therapy, based on data from the BEACON CRC study. Methods: This Phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-arm study evaluated E+C vs irinotecan + cetuximab or FOLFIRI + cetuximab (control arm) in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC whose disease progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatment lines in the metastatic setting. A safety lead-in initially conducted in 10 patients reported no DLTs. Eligible patients had mCRC and a BRAF V600E mutation in tumor tissue determined by a local assay before screening and centrally confirmed. Patients were randomly assigned to the doublet arm (E+C) or the control arm in a 2:1 ratio, respectively. Randomization was stratified by baseline ECOG performance status (0 vs 1) and prior use of irinotecan (yes vs no). The primary objective of the randomized phase was to compare the efficacy of E+C vs the control arm, as measured by PFS (assessed by blinded independent central review). Secondary objectives included PFS assessed by the investigator, ORR, DOR, DCR, TTR, OS, QoL, and safety and tolerability of E+C. Results of the randomized phase of the study are reported. Results: At data cut-off (19 Dec 2023), 65 patients were enrolled in the E+C arm and 32 in the control arm. Median patient age was 56 years, the primary cancer site was the left colon in 56.7% of patients, 48.5% had metastases to ≥3 organs, 56.7% had liver metastases, 77.3% received one prior metastatic treatment, and 22.7% received 2 prior metastatic treatments. Results are shown below for E+C vs the control arm, respectively. Median PFS assessed by BICR was 4.2 mo vs 2.5 mo (HR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.68; P=0.0004). Median OS was 11.6 mo vs 8.2 mo (HR for death 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.99). Confirmed ORR was 24.6% (95% CI: 14.8, 36.9) vs 6.3% (95% CI: 0.8, 20.8). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 47.7% vs 51.9% of patients. Treatment-related grade 3 or higher occurred in 24.6% and 44.4% of patients. The most frequent TEAEs were anemia (30.8% vs 37%), vomiting (26.2% vs 33.3%), rash (24.6% vs 29.6%), weight loss (23.1% vs 18.5%), hypoalbuminemia (21.5% vs 22.2%), and melanocytic naevus (21.5% vs 0%). Three patient deaths were reported during treatment: unknown cause (n=1) and pneumonia (n=1) in the E+C arm and septic shock (n=1) in the control arm. Conclusions: Treatment with a combination of encorafenib and cetuximab is effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC, resulting in a significantly longer PFS than standard therapies. These results are consistent with those previously reported in the BEACON study. Clinical trial information: NCT05004350 .

Encorafenib and binimetinib followed by radiotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastases (E-BRAIN/GEM1802 phase II study)

1439P Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Camrelizumab and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment for Advanced NSCLC with Brain Metastases: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

Response rate and molecular correlates to encorafenib and binimetinib in BRAF-V600E mutant high-grade glioma

Safety and efficacy evaluation of encorafenib plus binimetinib for the treatment of advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma patients

Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib/cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO real-world multicenter study

Combination of regorafenib with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of patients with refractory melanoma brain metastases.

Regorafenib Combined with BRAF/MEK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Refractory Melanoma Brain Metastases

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from an Italian multicenter experience

Encorafenib plus cetuximab treatment in BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients pre-treated with an anti-EGFR: An AGEO-GONO case series

Enhancing Radioiodine Incorporation in BRAF-Mutant, Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancers with Vemurafenib and the Anti-ErbB3 Monoclonal Antibody CDX-3379: Results of a Pilot Clinical Trial

First-line encorafenib plus binimetinib and pembrolizumab for advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: Safety lead-in results from the randomized phase III STARBOARD study

A phase II study of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated thyroid cancer in Japan

Sequencing of Checkpoint or BRAF/MEK Inhibitors on Brain Metastases in Melanoma

Concurrent BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in BRAF V600-Mutant High-Grade Primary Brain Tumors

SWOG S2107: Randomized phase II trial of encorafenib and cetuximab with or without nivolumab for patients with previously treated, microsatellite stable, BRAF V600E metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer.

Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Encorafenib and cetuximab versus irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: The NAUTICAL CRC study.

Regorafenib in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a single-center case series

Outcomes in patients with BRAFV600–mutated melanoma and brain metastases at baseline treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib

A Practical Review of Encorafenib and Binimetinib Therapy Management in Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A plain language summary of the PHAROS study: the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib for people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer