The Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Elderly Patients after Major Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jiarong Wang,Yupei Zou,Jichun Zhao,Darren B. Schneider,Yi Yang,Yukui Ma,Bin Huang,Ding Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.012
IF: 6.427
2018-01-01
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of published evidence of all frailty tools in major vascular surgery and to determine the effect of frailty on short and long-term outcomes after vascular procedures.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database and Scopus (updated on May 12, 2018) were searched for studies evaluating the effect of frailty in vascular surgery and data were extracted from the included studies. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The impact of frailty on outcomes was expressed as odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR) using a random effects model.ResultsA total of 22 cohort studies and one RCT were included. Overall frailty was found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of 30 day mortality in patients who underwent vascular surgery (OR 3.83, 95% CI 3.08–4.76), with similar effects in both patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (OR 5.15, 95% CI 3.91–6.77) and lower extremity revascularisation (OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.53–4.28). Functional status remained the only tool with high quality of evidence predicting 30 day mortality after vascular surgery (OR 4.49, 95% CI 3.81–5.30). As for long-term outcomes, frailty was associated with a significantly increased risk of long-term all cause mortality in the overall studied population (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.81–2.73), as well as in patients with AAA repair (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.59–2.79) and lower extremity revascularisation (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.73–3.49). Central muscle mass was found to be the only tool with moderate quality of evidence predicting long-term survival after major vascular surgery (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.76–3.49). Other single domain tools were generally scored as low quality, and the modified Frailty Index was the only multi-domain tool with moderate quality while others were scored as low or very low.ConclusionFrailty, assessed by functional status, can predict short-term mortality in elderly patients after vascular surgery; while central muscle mass may help determine long-term survival in abdominal aortic repair. As frailty is associated with both worse short and long-term outcomes, frailty assessment may be considered in patients scheduled for vascular surgery. To evaluate the quality of published evidence of all frailty tools in major vascular surgery and to determine the effect of frailty on short and long-term outcomes after vascular procedures. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database and Scopus (updated on May 12, 2018) were searched for studies evaluating the effect of frailty in vascular surgery and data were extracted from the included studies. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The impact of frailty on outcomes was expressed as odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR) using a random effects model. A total of 22 cohort studies and one RCT were included. Overall frailty was found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of 30 day mortality in patients who underwent vascular surgery (OR 3.83, 95% CI 3.08–4.76), with similar effects in both patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (OR 5.15, 95% CI 3.91–6.77) and lower extremity revascularisation (OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.53–4.28). Functional status remained the only tool with high quality of evidence predicting 30 day mortality after vascular surgery (OR 4.49, 95% CI 3.81–5.30). As for long-term outcomes, frailty was associated with a significantly increased risk of long-term all cause mortality in the overall studied population (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.81–2.73), as well as in patients with AAA repair (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.59–2.79) and lower extremity revascularisation (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.73–3.49). Central muscle mass was found to be the only tool with moderate quality of evidence predicting long-term survival after major vascular surgery (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.76–3.49). Other single domain tools were generally scored as low quality, and the modified Frailty Index was the only multi-domain tool with moderate quality while others were scored as low or very low. Frailty, assessed by functional status, can predict short-term mortality in elderly patients after vascular surgery; while central muscle mass may help determine long-term survival in abdominal aortic repair. As frailty is associated with both worse short and long-term outcomes, frailty assessment may be considered in patients scheduled for vascular surgery.