The proteomic approach to analysis of human milk fat globule membrane.

M. Cavaletto,M. Giuffrida,A. Conti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCCN.2004.04.026

2004-09-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Validation of Two Instruments for the Measurement of Dehumanization and Self-Dehumanization in Healthcare Settings

Aikaterini Roupa,Athina Patelarou,Evangelos C Fradelos,Kyriaki Fousiani,Marianna Miliaraki,Konstantinos Giakoumidakis,Evridiki Patelarou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030167

2024-09-06

Abstract:Understanding and addressing dehumanization in healthcare is crucial due to its profound impact on patient care, ethical implications on patient dignity and autonomy, and its potential to affect the psychological well-being of healthcare professionals. The primary aim of this study was to establish reliable and valid instruments measuring two different types of dehumanization, namely animalistic dehumanization (i.e., stripping one of their uniquely human characteristics) and mechanistic dehumanization (i.e., stripping one of their human nature characteristics) among healthcare professionals. In this cross-sectional validation study among healthcare professionals, we tested measures of both animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization, focusing on the dehumanization of patients (hetero-dehumanization) and oneself (self-dehumanization), respectively. All measures were developed and validated based on a concept analysis, a literature review, and an appraisal of pre-existing scales. The research was conducted among 400 nurses and medical doctors employed in Greek public hospitals. Coefficient validity ratio results showed that 100% of items were acceptable for both measures. The newly established and validated hetero-dehumanization scale encompassed two factors (factor 1: animalistic dehumanization, factor 2: mechanistic dehumanization; Cronbach's alpha was equal to 0.86 for each measure). The self-dehumanization scale was a mono-factorial measure of mechanistic dehumanization (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97). Two validated measures of (self- and hetero-) animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization measures were developed for the assessment of dehumanization among health professionals, which will form the basis for future research in this important scientific field.
Development and validation of a self‐report measure of perceived dehumanization from officers

Morgan Robison,Thomas Baker,Frances P. Abderhalden,Jill A. Gordon,Thomas E. Joiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23651

2024-02-03

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract:Purpose Emerging evidence indicates that incarcerated populations' perceptions of dehumanization by officers are prevalent, yet measures of it are few, and to our knowledge, no self‐report measure of dehumanization from officers exists. To fill this gap, we have developed the Perceived Dehumanization from Officers Scale (PDOS), which is designed as a brief measure to assess perception of officer treatment as dehumanizing. Methods In this article, we provide preliminary evidence from two studies examining the reliability and validity of the PDOS. In study 1, a jail sample (n = 411), we analyzed the exploratory factor structure, internal consistency, and discriminant validity (in relation to procedural justice [PJ]) of the PDOS. Additionally, using a cross‐sectional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis, we related independent variables with the PDOS, the dependent variable. In Study 2, a prison sample (n = 2993), we confirmed the findings from study 1. Results The PDOS appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of perceived dehumanization from officers with strong association between perceptions of PJ and perceived dehumanization from officers. Conclusions The PDOS provides opportunity for future research, intervention through rehumanization efforts, and signals the important officer treatment. Importantly We close by discussing implications of these studies, limitations, and future research directions to further develop and test the PDOS.

psychology, clinical
Development and validation of the self-injury stigma scale

Caitlin M O'Loughlin,Kenneth McClure,Brooke A Ammerman,Caitlin M. O'Loughlin,Brooke A. Ammerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.027

IF: 5.25

2024-02-01

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract:Non-suicidal self-injury is a prevalent and concerning behavior. Negative beliefs and stereotypes about NSSI are associated with negative outcomes, and negative, self-referential beliefs (e.g., self-stigmatizing beliefs) related to engagement in NSSI may be particularly harmful. Despite this, there is no validated measure specifically designed to assess for NSSI self-stigma. As this significantly hinders the ability to understand and quantify the effect of NSSI self-stigma, this study sought to validate the newly developed Self-Injury Stigma Scale (SISS). It was hypothesized the SISS would follow a four-factor structure that parallels a widely cited theoretical model of stigma. It was also hypothesized measures of shame and help-seeking self-stigma would be moderately, negatively, correlated with the SISS subscales, supporting the measure's validity. Participants from Study 1 were college students (n = 264, 65.8% female) with at least one lifetime NSSI act. A series of factor analytic models revealed a one-factor structure for the Application of Stigma subscale (i.e., third step of the four-step model). As this was the only SISS subscale to achieve an appropriate model fit, this scale alone was retained as the final SISS. The factor structure was tested via confirmatory factor analysis on a second sample (i.e., community participants with at least one past month of NSSI act; n = 240, 41.3% female). An acceptable fit on most, but not all, indices was reached. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported. The SISS retrospectively predicted past 3 month NSSI frequency and method versatility, and lifetime NSSI versatility, but not lifetime NSSI frequency or disclosure. Thus, the clinical utility of the SISS was partially supported. Findings offering evidence in favor of the SISS's appropriateness and utility as a measure of self-stigma of NSSI. Future work using this measure has the potential to clarify the risk associated with NSSI self-stigma and inform behavioral interventions.

psychiatry
Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.

Todd F. Heatherton,Janet Polivy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895

IF: 8.46

1991-01-01

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract:This article examines the measurement of short-lived (i.e., state) changes in self-esteem. A new scale is introduced that is sensitive to manipulations designed to temporarily alter self-esteem, and 5 studies are presented that support the scale's validity. The State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES) consists of 20 items modified from the widely used Janis-Field Feelings of Inadequacy Scale (Janis & Field, 1959). Psychometric analyses revealed that the SSES has 3 correlated factors: performance, social, and appearance self-esteem. Effects of naturally occurring and laboratory failure and of clinical treatment on SSES scores were examined; it was concluded that the SSES is sensitive to these sorts of manipulations. The scale has many potential uses, which include serving as a valid manipulation check index, measuring clinical change in self-esteem, and untangling the confounded relation between mood and self-esteem.

psychology, social
The Development and Preliminary Validity and Reliability of Self-Disclosure to Romantic Partner (SDRP) Scale

Münevver Özdemir,Hikmet Yazıcı

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241287742

IF: 2.3

2024-09-25

Psychological Reports

Abstract:Psychological Reports, Ahead of Print. The purpose of the present study was to develop and conduct a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Self Disclosure to Romantic Partner Scale that assesses adults' attitudes towards sharing their personal information that includes disturbing feelings, thoughts, and experiences with their romantic partners. Two studies were conducted for this purpose. The first study was carried out with 200 participants and the second study was conducted with 206 participants. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis showed a one-dimensional factor structure for the seven items of the Self Disclosure to Romantic Partner Scale. Furthermore, the results indicated that Cronbach alpha and McDonald's omega coefficient of Self Disclosure to Romantic Partner Scale were over .70 for both studies. Taken together, these findings suggest that Self Disclosure to Romantic Partner Scale has good psychometric properties.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Psychometric evaluation of the Differentiation of Self Inventory for adolescents

Donna G Knauth,Elizabeth A Skowron

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200405000-00003

Abstract:Background: Evidence of psychometric support is needed for use of the Differentiation of Self Inventory with adolescents as a clinical assessment instrument to evaluate psychotherapeutic progress and outcomes, and for its use as a research instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on the basis of Bowen family systems theory. Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the 46-item, self-report Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI) for use with adolescents. Method: An ex post facto research design was used to determine the psychometric properties of the DSI for adolescents, and to test theoretically grounded hypotheses drawn from Bowen theory that linked differentiation of self with chronic anxiety and symptom development. The DSI, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Symptom Pattern Scale were administered to an ethnically diverse sample of 363 adolescents 14 to 19 years of age. Results: The DSI full scale demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of.84. Factor analysis yielded a six-factor structure, representing the multidimensionality of the DSI items among adolescents. As hypothesized, differentiation of self mediated the relation between chronic anxiety and symptom development (p <.001), indicating that greater differentiation of self predicted fewer symptoms over and above chronic anxiety, and lending support to the construct validity of the DSI in adolescent populations. Conclusions: The results of this study support the use of the DSI with adolescents. Future longitudinal studies are needed for definitive causal conclusions regarding the role that differentiation of self plays as a mediator between the relation of chronic anxiety and symptom development.
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation

Mark Sherer,James E. Maddux,Blaise Mercandante,Steven Prentice-Dunn,Beth Jacobs,Ronald W. Rogers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663

IF: 2.3

1982-10-01

Psychological Reports

Abstract:Self-efficacy theory asserts that personal mastery expectations are the primary determinants of behavioral change. Further, it is suggested that individual differences in past experiences and attribution of success to skill or chance result in different levels of generalized self-efficacy expectations. To measure these generalized expectancies, a Self-efficacy Scale was developed. A factor analysis yielded two subscales: a General Self-efficacy subscale (17 items) and a Social Self-efficacy subscale (6 items). Confirmation of several predicted conceptual relationships between the Self-efficacy subscales and other personality measures (i.e., Locus of Control, Personal Control, Social Desirability, Ego Strength, Interpersonal Competence, and Self-esteem) provided evidence of construct validity. Positive relationships between the Self-efficacy Scale and vocational, educational, and military success established criterion validity. Future research and clinical uses of the scale were discussed.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Measuring engagement in deliberate self-harm behaviours: psychometric evaluation of six scales

Shane Latimer,Tanya Meade,Alan Tennant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-13-4

IF: 4.144

2013-01-03

BMC Psychiatry

Abstract:Abstract Background Engagement in Deliberate Self-Harm (DSH) is commonly measured by behavioural scales comprised of specific methods of self-harm. However, there is a scarcity of information about the degree to which the methods relate to the same DSH construct although such scales are routinely used to provide a DSH total score. This study addresses the shortfall by evaluating the dimensionality of six commonly used behavioural measures of DSH. Methods The DSH measures were Self-Injury Questionnaire Treatment Related (SIQTR), Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI), Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI), Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS), Self-Harm Information Form (SHIF) and Self-Harm Inventory (SHI). The behavioural scales contained in each measure were administered to 568 young Australians aged 18 to 30 years (62% university students, 21% mental health patients, and 17% community members). Scale quality was examined against the stringent standards for unidimensional measurement provided by the Rasch model. Results According to the stringent post-hoc tests provided by the Rasch measurement model, there is support for the unidimensionality of the items contained within each of the scales. All six scales contained items with differential item functioning, four scales contained items with local response dependency, and one item was grossly misfitting (due to a lack of discrimination). Conclusions This study supports the use of behavioural scales to measure a DSH construct, justifies the summing of items to form a total DSH score, informs the hierarchy of DSH methods in each scale, and extends the previous evidence for reliability and external validity (as provided by test developers) to a more complete account of scale quality. Given the overall adequacy of all six scales, clinicians and researchers are recommended to select the scale that best matches their adopted definition of DSH.

psychiatry
Measurement of Deliberate Self-Harm: Preliminary Data on the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory

Kim L. Gratz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012779403943

2001-01-01

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Abstract:Deliberate self-harm has recently begun to receive more systematic attention from clinical researchers. However, there remains a general lack of consensus as to how to define and measure this important clinical construct. There is still no standardized, empirically validated measure of deliberate self-harm, making it more difficult for research in this area to advance. The present paper provides an integrative, conceptual definition of deliberate self-harm as well as preliminary psychometric data on a newly developed measure of self-harm, the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI). One hundred and fifty participants from undergraduate psychology courses completed research packets consisting of the DSHI and other measures, and 93 of these participants completed the DSHI again after an interval of 2–4 weeks (M = 3.3 weeks). Preliminary findings indicate that the DSHI has high internal consistency; adequate construct, convergent, and discriminant validity; and adequate test-retest reliability.

psychology, clinical
Automatic Self Recriminations: Development and Validation of a Measure of Self-Condemnatory Internal Dialogue

Paul L. Hewitt,Sabrina Ge,Martin M. Smith,Gordon L. Flett,Simone Cheli,Danielle S. Molnar,Ariel Ko,Samuel F. Mikail,Thalia Lang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2303429

2024-01-27

Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract:This article introduces a measure of self-condemnatory internal dialogue as an element of the relationship with the self: The Automatic Self-Recrimination Scale (ASRS). Using the construct validation approach to test construction, we describe the initial development of items and report on findings from a clinical and nonclinical sample showing the ASRS is best understood as a multidimensional measure of self-critical internal dialogue composed of one higher-order factor and four lower-order facets: Not Mattering, Self as Failure, Undeserving Self, and Loathsomeness. The overall scale and four subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Moreover, there was evidence of good convergent and incremental validity of the ASRS subscales with measures of perfectionism, self-criticism, and dysfunctional attitudes. Overall, the ASRS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of an automatic self-recriminatory internal dialogue.

psychology, clinical, social
A construct validity study of a Differentiation of Self Scale

J Haber

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to establish construct validity of the Haber Level of Differentiation of Self Scale (LDSS) that measures selected aspects of the construct, differentiation of self, the key concept of the Bowen Theory. During stage one of this study, a 32-item Likert-type LDSS, which contained two subscales, Emotional Maturity, (EM), and Emotional Dependency (ED), was administered to 372 volunteer subjects. Factor analytic and correlational findings indicated support for a 24-item unidimensional rather than a 32-item two subscale instrument. Recalculation of coefficient alpha (.90) also supported the unidimensional structure of the LDSS. During stage two of this study, the revised 24-item LDSS was administered to 372 volunteer subjects, who also completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Life Experience Survey, and the Behavior Checklist. Hypotheses predicted that there would be negative relationships between differentiation of self and trait anxiety, state anxiety, adult psychological dysfunction, and negative impact stress. Findings indicate support for all hypotheses at the p < .01 level of significance or greater. Data from this study suggest that the 24-item LDSS is a valid and reliable unidimensional family assessment tool that accurately measures specific aspects of the construct, differentiation of self. The LDSS can be used by nurses and other professionals to assess individual and family functioning in a variety of health care settings.
The Development and Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale (Long- and Short Form)

Kristin D. Neff,István Tóth-Király,Marissa C. Knox,Ashley Kuchar,Oliver Davidson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01505-4

2020-09-30

Mindfulness

Abstract:ObjectivesThe purpose of this research was to create two state measures of self-compassion based on the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS): an 18-item State Self-Compassion Scale-Long form (SSCS-L) that could be used to measure the six components of self-compassion, and a six-item State Self-Compassion Scale-Short form (SSCS-S) that could be used as a measure of global state self-compassion.MethodsStudy 1 (N = 588) used a community sample to select items for the SSCS-L and SSCS-S. Confirmatory Factor Analyses, Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and bifactor modeling were used to analyze the factor structure of the SSCS-L and SSCS-S. Predictive validity was assessed by examining associations with positive and negative affect. Study 2 (N = 411) used a student sample to examine the psychometric properties of the SSCS-L and SSCS-S after a self-compassion mindstate induction (SCMI) to determine if its factor structure would remain unchanged after manipulation. Study 3 (N = 139) examined the psychometric properties of the SSCS-S alone.ResultsThe SSCS-L had good psychometric properties and SSCS-S was also adequate. A bifactor-ESEM representation (with one global factor and six components) was supported for the SSCS-L, and a single factor was supported for the SSCS-S. Both scales were reliable. Psychometric properties were unchanged after the experimental manipulation of self-compassion. A total state self-compassion score and subscale scores were associated with positive and negative affect in the expected directions.ConclusionsThe SSCS-L and SSCS-S appear to be valid measures of state self-compassion.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical
The short version of the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3): Measurement invariance across countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations

Chung-Ying Lin,Meng-Che Tsai,Mónika Koós,Léna Nagy,Shane W Kraus,Zsolt Demetrovics,Marc N Potenza,Rafael Ballester-Arnal,Dominik Batthyány,Sophie Bergeron,Joël Billieux,Peer Briken,Georgina Cárdenas-López,Joana Carvalho,Jesús Castro-Calvo,Lijun Chen,Giacomo Ciocca,Ornella Corazza,Rita I Csako,David P Fernandez,Elaine F Fernandez,Hironobu Fujiwara,Johannes Fuss,Roman Gabrhelík,Ateret Gewirtz-Meydan,Biljana Gjoneska,Mateusz Gola,Joshua B Grubbs,Hashim T Hashim,Md Saiful Islam,Mustafa Ismail,Martha Jiménez-Martínez,Tanja Jurin,Ondrej Kalina,Verena Klein,András Költő,Sang-Kyu Lee,Karol Lewczuk,Christine Lochner,Silvia López-Alvarado,Kateřina Lukavská,Percy Mayta-Tristán,Ion Milea,Dan J Miller,Oľga Orosová,Gábor Orosz,Sungkyunkwan University's research team,Fernando P Ponce,Gonzalo R Quintana,Gabriel C Quintero Garzola,Jano Ramos-Diaz,Kévin Rigaud,Ann Rousseau,Marco De Tubino Scanavino,Marion K Schulmeyer,Pratap Sharan,Mami Shibata,Sheikh Shoib,Vera Sigre-Leirós,Luke Sniewski,Ognen Spasovski,Vesta Steibliene,Dan J Stein,Julian Strizek,Aleksandar Štulhofer,Berk C Ünsal,Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel,Marie Claire Van Hout,Beáta Bőthe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100461

Abstract:Background: The three-item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3) has been frequently used to assess distress related to sexuality in public health surveys and research on sexual wellbeing. However, its psychometric properties and measurement invariance across cultural, gender and sexual subgroups have not yet been examined. This multinational study aimed to validate the SDS-3 and test its psychometric properties, including measurement invariance across language, country, gender identity, and sexual orientation groups. Methods: We used global survey data from 82,243 individuals (Mean age=32.39 years; 40.3 % men, 57.0 % women, 2.8 % non-binary, and 0.6 % other genders) participating in the International Sexual Survey (ISS; https://internationalsexsurvey.org/) across 42 countries and 26 languages. Participants completed the SDS-3, as well as questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics, including gender identity and sexual orientation. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a unidimensional factor structure for the SDS-3, and multi-group CFA (MGCFA) suggested that this factor structure was invariant across countries, languages, gender identities, and sexual orientations. Cronbach's α for the unidimensional score was 0.83 (range between 0.76 and 0.89), and McDonald's ω was 0.84 (range between 0.76 and 0.90). Participants who did not experience sexual problems had significantly lower SDS-3 total scores (M = 2.99; SD=2.54) compared to those who reported sexual problems (M = 5.60; SD=3.00), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.01 [95 % CI=-1.03, -0.98]; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The SDS-3 has a unidimensional factor structure and appears to be valid and reliable for measuring sexual distress among individuals from different countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations.
Development and validation of the Ryerson Social Anxiety Scales (RSAS)

Ariella P. Lenton-Brym,Jenny Rogojanski,Heather K. Hood,Valerie Vorstenbosch,Randi E. McCabe,Martin M. Antony

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1771137

2020-06-01

Abstract:Background: Extant self-report measures of social anxiety primarily assess the breadth of social situations in which respondents feel anxious, rather than assessing severity in terms of the distress and impairment that individuals experience due to their social anxiety symptoms. This paper describes the development and validation of the Ryerson Social Anxiety Scales (RSAS; Rogojanski et al., 2019; see Appendix), a new measure for assessing both the breadth of situations that trigger social anxiety and the severity (i.e., distress and impairment) associated with social anxiety, across two studies.Method/Design: Two samples of university students (N = 501 total) completed demographic and self-report symptom measures. In Study 1, participants completed the RSAS and several other measures of psychological symptoms. In Study 2, participants completed the same measures and were also assessed for the presence of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) using a semistructured clinical interview.Results: Across both samples, the RSAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency and incremental validity. It consistently emerged as a unique predictor of psychosocial impairment. In Study 2, increases in RSAS scores were associated with increased odds of having SAD.Conclusions: The RSAS has robust psychometric properties and fills an important gap among available measures for assessing SAD severity.
The Social Media Use Scale: Development and Validation

Alison B. Tuck,Renee J. Thompson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231173080

IF: 4.282

2023-05-26

Assessment

Abstract:Assessment, Ahead of Print. Social media (SM) use has been primarily operationalized as frequency of use or as passive versus active use. We hypothesize that these constructs have shown mixed associations with psychological constructs because the factor structure underlying social media use (SMU) has not been fully identified. We conducted three studies with college students. In Study 1 (N = 176), we collected data about participants' SMU, informing item generation. In Study 2 (N = 311), we tested two factor structures: (a) passive, active social, and active non-social and (b) a hypothesized four-factor structure. Neither confirmatory model produced acceptable fits, but an exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor model: belief-based, consumption-based, image-based, and comparison-based SMU. This four-factor structure was supported in Study 3 (N = 397), which was preregistered, via a confirmatory factor analysis. The subscale items showed good internal consistencies, and evidence is presented for convergent validity. These factors represent a novel classification of people's SMU that can be measured with the Social Media Use Scale.

psychology, clinical
Development of the Stanford Social Dimensions Scale: initial validation in autism spectrum disorder and in neurotypicals

Jennifer M. Phillips,Mirko Uljarević,Rachel K. Schuck,Salena Schapp,Elizabeth M. Solomon,Emma Salzman,Lauren Allerhand,Robin A. Libove,Thomas W. Frazier,Antonio Y. Hardan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0298-9

2019-12-01

Molecular Autism

Abstract:Abstract Background The aim of this paper was to provide an initial validation of a newly developed parent questionnaire—the Stanford Social Dimensions Scale (SSDS), designed to capture individual differences across several key social dimensions including social motivation in children and adolescents with and without psychiatric disorders. Methods The initial validation sample was comprised of parents of 175 individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (35 females, 140 males; M age = 7.19 years, SD age = 3.96) and the replication sample consisted of 624 parents of children who were either typically developing or presented with a range of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders (302 females, 322 males; M age = 11.49 years, SD age = 4.48). Parents from both samples completed the SSDS and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2). Results Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling indicated that a 5-factor model provided adequate to excellent fit to the data in the initial ASD sample (comparative fit index [CFI] = .940, Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = .919, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .048, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = .038). The identified factors were interpreted as Social Motivation, Social Affiliation, Expressive Social Communication, Social Recognition, and Unusual Approach. This factor structure was further confirmed in Sample 2 (CFI = 946, TLI = .930, RMSEA = .044, SRMR = .026). Internal consistency for all subscales was in the good to excellent range across both samples as indicated by Composite Reliability scores of ≥ .72. Convergent and divergent validity was strong as indexed by the pattern of correlations with relevant SRS-2 and Child Behavior Checklist domains and with verbal and non-verbal intellectual functioning scores in Sample 1 and with the Need to Belong Scale and Child Social Preference Scale scores in Sample 2. Across both samples, females had higher social motivation and expressive social communication scores. Discriminant validity was strong given that across all SSDS subscales, the ASD sample had significantly higher impairment than both the typically developing group and the group with other clinical conditions, which in turn, had significantly higher impairment than the typically developing group. Conclusions Our findings provide initial validation of a new scale designed to comprehensively capture individual differences in social motivation and other key social dimensions in ASD.

genetics & heredity,neurosciences
Measurement invariance of the Depressive Symptom Inventory–Suicidality Scale across race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and plurality of minoritized identities.

Min Eun Jeon,Nikhila S. Udupa,Miracle R. Potter,Morgan Robison,Lee Robertson,Megan L. Rogers,Thomas E. Joiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001306

2024-02-08

Psychological Assessment

Abstract:Measurement invariance across diverse groups, though crucial for determining the generalizability of a measure, has not yet been tested in many assessments of suicidal thoughts. The present study assessed the measurement invariance and psychometric properties of one such assessment, the Depressive Symptom Inventory-Suicidality Subscale, across multiple identity dimensions in a large data set (n = 1,118) that combined three diverse samples. Findings supported measurement invariance of the scale by race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation when comparing those who were majority-aligning with their minoritized counterparts, as well as good internal consistency and expected convergent validity. The expected one-factor structure fit well for all three of the samples assessed. Overall, the results support measurement invariance and generalizability of the Depressive Symptom Inventory-Suicidality Subscale. Future studies should continue assessing measures of suicidal thoughts and behaviors through testing invariance across identities, especially as it pertains to specific identity subgroups and their intersections. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, clinical
The mental health self‐direction scale: An abridged version and its sensitivity to change

Sam M. H. de Haas,Pauline D. Janse,Bea G. Tiemens,Giel J. M. Hutschemaekers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23686

2024-04-03

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract:Objective The Mental Health Self‐Direction Scale (MHSD) measures the extent to which clients are able to resolve mental problems by themselves. Because this scale had not yet been evaluated, the aims of this paper were (a) to evaluate and improve the MHSD and (b) to explore the sensitivity to change of the improved scale. Method The MHSD was evaluated and improved by means of confirmatory factor analyses of data from one longitudinal and two cross‐sectional outpatient sample. Inconsistent items were removed in a stepwise fashion. Subsequently, the scale's sensitivity to change was explored in the longitudinal sample by using latent growth curve models. Results The original 31‐item scale was reduced to a more stable version with 19 items that yielded four factors named: actorship, demoralization, commitment, and understanding. Throughout clients' treatment, actorship and understanding tended to increase; demoralization tended to decrease; and commitment remained consistently high. Conclusions The abridged MHSD scale is stable and sensitive to change. It measures the extent to which clients experience and develop self‐direction throughout their treatment. With the use of the new MHSD scale, new views on mental health that emphasize clients' ability to actively engage and cope with health‐challenges can be incorporated into clinical treatment.

psychology, clinical
An Exploratory Study of "Selfitis" and the Development of the Selfitis Behavior Scale

Janarthanan Balakrishnan,Mark D Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9844-x

Abstract:In 2014, stories appeared in national and international media claiming that the condition of "selfitis" (the obsessive taking of selfies) was to be classed as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association and that the condition could be borderline, acute, or chronic. However, the stories were a hoax but this did not stop empirical research being carried out into the concept. The present study empirically explored the concept and collected data on the existence of selfitis with respect to the three alleged levels (borderline, acute, and chronic) and developed the Selfitis Behavior Scale (SBS). Initially, focus group interviews with 225 Indian university students were carried out to generate potential items for the SBS. The SBS was then validated using 400 Indian university students via exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Six factors were identified in the EFA comprising environmental enhancement, social competition, attention seeking, mood modification, self-confidence, and social conformity. The findings demonstrate that the SBS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing selfitis but that confirmatory studies are needed to validate the concept more rigorously.

The proteomic approach to analysis of human milk fat globule membrane.

Validation of Two Instruments for the Measurement of Dehumanization and Self-Dehumanization in Healthcare Settings

Development and validation of a self‐report measure of perceived dehumanization from officers

Development and validation of the self-injury stigma scale

Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.

The Development and Preliminary Validity and Reliability of Self-Disclosure to Romantic Partner (SDRP) Scale

Psychometric evaluation of the Differentiation of Self Inventory for adolescents

The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation

Measuring engagement in deliberate self-harm behaviours: psychometric evaluation of six scales

Measurement of Deliberate Self-Harm: Preliminary Data on the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory

Automatic Self Recriminations: Development and Validation of a Measure of Self-Condemnatory Internal Dialogue

A construct validity study of a Differentiation of Self Scale

The Development and Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale (Long- and Short Form)

The short version of the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3): Measurement invariance across countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations

Development and validation of the Ryerson Social Anxiety Scales (RSAS)

The Social Media Use Scale: Development and Validation

Development of the Stanford Social Dimensions Scale: initial validation in autism spectrum disorder and in neurotypicals

Measurement invariance of the Depressive Symptom Inventory–Suicidality Scale across race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and plurality of minoritized identities.

The mental health self‐direction scale: An abridged version and its sensitivity to change

An Exploratory Study of "Selfitis" and the Development of the Selfitis Behavior Scale