"Effects of threshold respiratory muscle training on respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function and exercise endurance after stroke: a meta-analysis"

Lei Li,Rui Liu,Jing He,Jing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107837
Abstract:Background: Most studies on improvements in respiratory muscle strength, activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) in stroke patients receiving threshold respiratory muscle training (TRMT) have small sample sizes, and some studies have contradictory results. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of TRMT on respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function and exercise endurance in stroke patients. Materials and methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Physical Therapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Embase (via OVID) and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trial (RCT) from inception to January 17, 2024. The primary outcome was maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) or maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function measured by forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), and exercise endurance measured by 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Results: A total of eight randomized controlled trials(RCTs), including 305 persons, were included in this study. The training time ranged from 3 weeks to 10 weeks. Among them, the intervention group in 4 studies used inspiratory muscle training, and the other 4 studies used inspiratory muscle training and expiratory muscle training. For the primary outcome, TRMT significantly improved MIP (mean=14.68 cmH2O, 95 %CI=2.28 to 27.09 cmH2O, P=0.02) and MEP (mean=9.37 cmH2O, 95 %CI=2.89 to 15.84 cmH2O, P=0.005) in stroke patients. Regarding the secondary outcomes, TRMT improved FVC, FEV1 and 6MWT (P<0.05) but did not significantly improve PEF. Conclusion: TRMT improved inspiratory muscle strength and expiratory muscle strength, improved exercise endurance, and improved FVC and FEV1 of pulmonary function but did not significantly improve PEF.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?