Cerebral infarction in a 17-year old boy--is it truly primary APLA syndrome?

K. Namboodiri,K. Krishnamoorthy,E. Rajeev
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Abstract:First, while determining the appropriate therapy for patients with stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO), a distinction has to be made between those with an ‘innocent’ PFO and those with a causative PFO. This has important treatment implications. The index patient does not come under the second group i.e. the subset that needs consideration for closure of PFO. Valvular lesions and bradyarrhyhmias themselves can account for stroke in this case. Closure of PFO in these cases will not require these patients from being on oral anticoagulants, if lupus anticoagulant (LA) was presumed to be truly positive. However if mitral valve repair is being planned, concomitant PFO closure can be contemplated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?