Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Cognition
Jinse Park,Eungseok Oh,Seong-Beom Koh,In-Uk Song,Tae-Beom Ahn,Sang Jin Kim,Sang-Myung Cheon,Yoon-Joong Kim,Jin Whan Cho,Hyeo-Il Ma,Mee Young Park,Jong Sam Baik,Phil Hyu Lee,Sun Ju Chung,Jong-Min Kim,Han-Joon Kim,Young-Hee Sung,Do Young Kwon,Jae-Hyeok Lee,Jee-Young Lee,Ji Seon Kim,Ji Young Yun,Hee Jin Kim,Jin Yong Hong,Mi-Jung Kim,Jinyoung Youn,Hui-Jun Yang,Won Tae Yoon,Sooyeoun You,Kyum-Yil Kwon,Su-Yun Lee,Younsoo Kim,Hee-Tae Kim,Joong-Seok Kim,Ji-Young Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.24061
Abstract:Objective: The Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Cognition (SCOPA-Cog) was developed to assess cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the SCOPACog (K-SCOPA-Cog). Methods: We enrolled 129 PD patients with movement disorders from 31 clinics in South Korea. The original version of the SCOPA-Cog was translated into Korean using the translation-retranslation method. The test-retest method with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were used to assess reliability. Spearman's rank correlation analysis with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Korean version (MOCA-K) and the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) were used to assess concurrent validity. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.797, and the ICC was 0.887. Spearman's rank correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation with the K-MMSE and MOCA-K scores (r = 0.546 and r = 0.683, respectively). Conclusion: Our. Results: demonstrate that the K-SCOPA-Cog has good reliability and validity.