When Humor in the Hospital Is No Laughing Matter

J. Aultman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/JCE200920304
2009-09-01
Abstract:A study published in 2006, “Making Fun of Patients: Medical Students’ Perceptions and Use of Derogatory and Cynical Humor in Clinical Set-tings,” exposes a truth long acknowledged within hospital culture: physicians, medical students, and other healthcare professionals use derogatory and cynical humor in the clinical setting to respond to and control difficult, unusual, or burdensome situations and/or patients, to relieve stress and anxiety, and to foster collegiality and solidarity. But are these motives for using and responding to derogatory and cynical humor morally justifiable? In taking a closer look at the use of humor that is derogatory and cynical in the hospital, it at first appears that healthcare providers and students “step aside, look upon life as a disinterested spectator,” as Henri Bergson put it; devoid of emotion, they ridicule patients, colleagues, and others, and find them or their predicament to be funny, and thus contribute to the ethical erosion of medical education and practice. And so my initial reaction is to suggest that derogatory and cynical humor in the hospital setting is morally unjustifiable. Nevertheless, there are several convincing arguments that not all humor — even derogatory humor — should be deemed morally objectionable, and that the task of moralizing humor may be a futile endeavor. Recent literature reveals that humor can be very therapeutic for healthcare professionals and patients alike. However, the aim of this article is not to contest the therapeutic effects of humor in general, but to show why derogatory and cynical humor, in particular, are unethical and non-therapeutic, concluding that such humor should be distanced from the professional healthcare setting through better education and rolemodeling practices. Derogatory and cynical humor cannot be distanced from the healthcare setting until we first recognize the underlying motives and attitudes that persuade us to believe that these types of humor are morally and professionally acceptable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?