Abstract:AlphaFold2 has revolutionized protein structure prediction by leveraging sequence information to rapidly model protein folds with atomic‐level accuracy. Nevertheless, previous work has shown that these predictions tend to be inaccurate for structurally heterogeneous proteins. To systematically assess factors that contribute to this inaccuracy, we tested AlphaFold2's performance on 98‐fold‐switching proteins, which assume at least two distinct‐yet‐stable secondary and tertiary structures. Topological similarities were quantified between five predicted and two experimentally determined structures of each fold‐switching protein. Overall, 94% of AlphaFold2 predictions captured one experimentally determined conformation but not the other. Despite these biased results, AlphaFold2's estimated confidences were moderate‐to‐high for 74% of fold‐switching residues, a result that contrasts with overall low confidences for intrinsically disordered proteins, which are also structurally heterogeneous. To investigate factors contributing to this disparity, we quantified sequence variation within the multiple sequence alignments used to generate AlphaFold2's predictions of fold‐switching and intrinsically disordered proteins. Unlike intrinsically disordered regions, whose sequence alignments show low conservation, fold‐switching regions had conservation rates statistically similar to canonical single‐fold proteins. Furthermore, intrinsically disordered regions had systematically lower prediction confidences than either fold‐switching or single‐fold proteins, regardless of sequence conservation. AlphaFold2's high prediction confidences for fold switchers indicate that it uses sophisticated pattern recognition to search for one most probable conformer rather than protein biophysics to model a protein's structural ensemble. Thus, it is not surprising that its predictions often fail for proteins whose properties are not fully apparent from solved protein structures. Our results emphasize the need to look at protein structure as an ensemble and suggest that systematic examination of fold‐switching sequences may reveal propensities for multiple stable secondary and tertiary structures.

AlphaFold2 as a replacement for solution NMR structure determination of small proteins: Not so fast!

AlphaFold 2 and NMR Spectroscopy: Partners to Understand Protein Structure, Dynamics and Function

AlphaFold2 knows some protein folding principles

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Prediction of peptide structural conformations with AlphaFold2

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function

AlphaFold predictions of fold-switched conformations are driven by structure memorization

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

Effective High-Accuracy Prediction of Protein Structures from Easily Obtainable Artificial Homologous Sequences by Structure-Stability-Based Selection

Predicting relative populations of protein conformations without a physics engine using AlphaFold2

Dissecting AlphaFolds Capabilities with Limited Sequence Information

Assessing AF2’s ability to predict structural ensembles of proteins

Protein structure prediction in the era of AI: Challenges and limitations when applying to in silico force spectroscopy

AlphaFold-assisted structure determination of a bacterial protein of unknown function using X-ray and electron crystallography

AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching

Exploring AlphaFold2's Performance on Predicting Amino Acid Side-Chain Conformations and Its Utility in Crystal Structure Determination of B318L Protein

AlphaFold and Protein Folding: Not Dead Yet! The Frontier Is Conformational Ensembles

High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement

Overview of AlphaFold2 and breakthroughs in overcoming its limitations