Socioeconomic determinants of male contraceptive use in South Africa: a secondary analysis of the 2016 SADHS data
Yulisha Naidoo,Liezl Joubert,Karen Nhakaniso,Emmanuella Nzeribe,Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu,Denis Okova,Plaxcedes Chiwire,Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20295-1
IF: 4.5
2024-10-09
BMC Public Health
Abstract:Background: Historically, family planning discussions have predominantly centred on women, overlooking the crucial role men play in contraception. This is particularly concerning in regions like Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where reproductive health challenges are pronounced. South Africa, a key country within SSA, continues to grapple with issues such as high unintended pregnancy rates and increasing pregnancy-related mortality. Understanding the factors that deter male contraceptive use is essential for achieving universal access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. This study investigates the socioeconomic disparities influencing male contraceptive use in South Africa, drawing on data from the 2016 South Africa Demographic Health Survey. Methods: The study utilised data from the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey, which employed a stratified, two-stage sampling design across all provinces based on the 2011 Census. The survey focused on men aged 15-59 using the "Man's Questionnaire." Various socio-demographic and attitudinal variables were analysed using STATA 17. The analysis included multinomial logistic regression to identify determinants of male contraceptive use and the Erreygers Normalized Concentration Index to assess socioeconomic inequalities in contraceptive uptake. Results: Among the surveyed men, 47% reported not using any contraception, 40% used male methods, and 13% relied on their partners' contraceptive use. A majority began sexual activity between the ages of 14-17 (54%), resided in urban areas (56%), were unmarried (67%), and had attained secondary education (70%). Notably, 78% disagreed that contraception is solely a woman's responsibility, and 64% expressed positive attitudes toward contraception. Age, marital status, and education level emerged as significant factors influencing contraceptive use. The study revealed a slight pro-rich inequality in male contraception use, with socioeconomic status (SES) being the most significant contributor to this disparity (223.22%). This suggests that higher SES is associated with increased inequality in the adoption of modern male contraceptive methods. Conclusion: These findings highlight the impact of socioeconomic disparities and entrenched cultural beliefs on male contraceptive use in South Africa. To address these challenges, comprehensive strategies that prioritise education, expand family planning media campaigns and ensure equitable access to contraception are urgently needed.