Individual Differences in Hemispheric Emotional Valence by Computerized Test Correlate with Lateralized Differences in Nucleus Accumbens, Hippocampal and Amygdala Volumes
Fredric Schiffer,Alaptagin Khan,Kyoko Ohashi,Laura C Hernandez Garcia,Carl M Anderson,Lisa D Nickerson,Martin H Teicher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S357138
IF: 3.974
2022-06-02
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Fredric Schiffer, 1, 2 Alaptagin Khan, 1, 2 Kyoko Ohashi, 1, 2 Laura C Hernandez Garcia, 1, 2 Carl M Anderson, 1, 2 Lisa D Nickerson, 1, 3 Martin H Teicher 1, 2 1 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Developmental Biopsychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA; 3 McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA Correspondence: Fredric Schiffer, Developmental Biopsychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA, Tel +1 617 855 2970, Fax +1 617 855 3712, Email Purpose: Conventional theories of hemispheric emotional valence (HEV) postulate fixed hemispheric differences in emotional processing. Schiffer's dual brain psychology proposes that there are prominent individual differences with a substantial subset showing a reversed laterality pattern. He further proposed that hemispheric differences were more akin to differences in personality than in emotional processing. This theory is supported by findings that unilateral treatments, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, are effective if they accurately target individual differences in laterality. The aim of this paper was to assess if a computer test of hemispheric emotional valence (CTHEV) could effectively identify individual differences in HEV and to ascertain if these individual differences were associated with underlying differences in brain structure and connectivity. Patients and Methods: The CTHEV was administered to 50 (18 male/32 female) right-handed participants, aged 18– 19 years, enrolled in a study assessing the neurobiological effects of childhood maltreatment. Based on a literature review, we determined whether CTHEV correlated with lateralized volumes of the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, and subgenual anterior cingulate as well as volume of the corpus callosum. Results: CTHEV scores correlated with laterality indices of the nucleus accumbens (p = 0.00016), amygdala (p = 0.0138) and hippocampus (p = 0.031). A positive left hemispheric valence was associated with a larger left-sided nucleus accumbens and hippocampus and a smaller left amygdala. We identified four eigenvector network centrality DTI measures that predict CTHEV, most notably the left amygdala, and found that CTHEV results correlated with total and segment-specific corpus callosal volumes. Conclusion: Individual differences in HEV can be readily assessed by computer test and correlate with differences in brain structure and connectivity that could provide a mechanistic understanding. These findings provide further support for a revised understanding of HEV and provide a tool that could be used to guide lateralized brain treatments. Keywords: cerebral laterality, brain structure, personality, Dual-Brain Psychology, corpus callosum Three theories have been advanced to explain differences in hemispheric emotional valence (HEV). The first is the valence hypothesis that states that the right hemisphere is associated with negative emotions and the left with positive emotions. 1,2 The second is the right brain hypothesis that posits that the right brain is specialized for all emotions, 3–5 and the third, the motivational hypothesis proposes that the hemispheres can be categorized as supporting approach or withdrawal emotions, 6,7 with the right hemisphere specialized for the expression of emotions associated with withdrawal responses. We believe that these theories are deficient in two major ways. First, they fail to recognize that there are marked individual differences in HEV with a substantial portion of the population displaying a reversed laterality pattern. Second, they overly simplify the differences between the hemispheres, which we have proposed 8 involve multifaceted differences that extend beyond positive/negative emotions or approach/withdrawal responses. This fourth theory, which Schiffer has termed Dual Brain Psychology, 9 is based on extensive research, 8,10–19 and proposes that each hemisphere is associated with a full array of mental properties, including emotional, cognitive, and behavioral reactions. How the hemispheres differ may best be described from a clinical perspective with one hemisphere displaying healthier and more mature aspects of personality and world view while the other presents as more childlike in its mental properties and appears to be more adversely affected by past traumas. Based on work by Wittling 20,21 and split-brain studies, 22–24 we found that limiting vision to one lateral visual field produces a marked differential effect on h -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary