Hypoxia inhibits induction of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity in topminnow hepatocarcinoma cells in an ARNT-dependent manner.

Carrie R. Fleming,S. Billiard,R. Di Giulio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2009.06.003

2009-09-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Delta-band Neural Activity Primarily Tracks Sentences Instead of Semantic Properties of Words

Yuhan Lu,Peiqing Jin,Xunyi Pan,Nai Ding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118979

IF: 5.7

2022-01-01

NeuroImage

Abstract:Human language is generally combinatorial: Words are combined into sentences to flexibly convey meaning. How the brain represents sentences, however, remains debated. Recently, it has been shown that delta-band cortical activity correlates with the sentential structure of speech. It remains debated, however, whether delta-band cortical tracking of sentences truly reflects mental representations of sentences or is caused by neural encoding of semantic properties of individual words. The current study investigates whether delta-band neural tracking of speech can be explained by semantic properties of individual words. Cortical activity is recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) when participants listen to sentences repeating at 1 Hz and word lists. The semantic properties of individual words, simulated using a word2vec model, predict a stronger 1 Hz response to word lists than to sentences. When listeners perform a word-monitoring task that does not require sentential processing, the 1 Hz response to word lists, however, is much weaker than the 1 Hz response to sentences, contradicting the prediction of the lexical semantics model. When listeners are explicitly asked to parse word lists into multi-word chunks, however, cortical activity can reliably track the multi-word chunks. Taken together, these results suggest that delta-band neural responses to speech cannot be fully explained by the semantic properties of single words and are potentially related to the neural representation of multi-word chunks.
Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and Theory of Mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach

Miriam Hauptman,Idan Blank,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.08.481056

2022-03-10

Abstract:Abstract Going beyond the literal meaning of utterances is key to communicative success. However, the mechanisms that support non-literal inferences remain debated. We use a novel meta-analytic approach to evaluate the contribution of linguistic, social-cognitive, and executive mechanisms to non-literal interpretation. We identified 74 fMRI experiments (n=1,430 participants) from 2001-2021 that contrasted non-literal language comprehension with a literal control condition, spanning ten phenomena (e.g., metaphor, irony, indirect speech). Applying the activation likelihood estimation approach to the 825 activation peaks yielded six left-lateralized clusters. We then evaluated the locations of both the individual-study peaks and the clusters against probabilistic functional atlases (cf. macroanatomy, as is typically done) for three candidate brain networks—the language-selective network (Fedorenko et al., 2011), which supports language processing, the Theory of Mind (ToM) network (Saxe & Kanwisher, 2003), which supports social inferences, and the domain-general Multiple-Demand (MD) network (Duncan, 2010), which supports executive control. These atlases were created by overlaying individual activation maps of participants who performed robust and extensively validated ‘localizer’ tasks (n=806 for language; n=198 for ToM; n=691 for MD). The analysis revealed that both the individual-study peaks and the ALE clusters fell primarily within the language network and the ToM network. These results suggest that non-literal processing is supported by both i) mechanisms that process literal linguistic meaning, and ii) mechanisms that support general social inference. They thus undermine a strong divide between literal and non-literal aspects of language and challenge the claim that non-literal processing requires additional executive resources. Significance Statement Non-literal language is pervasive in communication. Past work has linked non-literal language understanding to language comprehension, social inference, and executive control, which selectively draw on the language, Theory of Mind (ToM), and Multiple Demand (MD) brain networks, respectively. Using a novel meta-analytic approach, we leverage ‘probabilistic functional atlases’ for these networks—created using fMRI data from hundreds of participants performing validated functional ‘localizers’—to interpret activations for non-literal>literal contrasts from 74 past fMRI studies (1,430 participants, 825 activation peaks). Unlike traditional meta-analyses, which rely on anatomy for interpretation, this approach enables inferences about cognitive processes. We find that activations fall within the language and ToM networks, but not the MD network, undermining the role of executive control in non-literal interpretation.
High-level language brain regions process sublexical regularities

Tamar I Regev,Hee So Kim,Xuanyi Chen,Josef Affourtit,Abigail E Schipper,Leon Bergen,Kyle Mahowald,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae077

IF: 4.861

2024-03-20

Cerebral Cortex

Abstract:A network of left frontal and temporal brain regions supports language processing. This "core" language network stores our knowledge of words and constructions as well as constraints on how those combine to form sentences. However, our linguistic knowledge additionally includes information about phonemes and how they combine to form phonemic clusters, syllables, and words. Are phoneme combinatorics also represented in these language regions? Across five functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, we investigated the sensitivity of high-level language processing brain regions to sublexical linguistic regularities by examining responses to diverse nonwords—sequences of phonemes that do not constitute real words (e.g. punes, silory, flope). We establish robust responses in the language network to visually (experiment 1a, n = 605) and auditorily (experiments 1b, n = 12, and 1c, n = 13) presented nonwords. In experiment 2 ( n = 16), we find stronger responses to nonwords that are more well-formed, i.e. obey the phoneme-combinatorial constraints of English. Finally, in experiment 3 ( n = 14), we provide suggestive evidence that the responses in experiments 1 and 2 are not due to the activation of real words that share some phonology with the nonwords. The results suggest that sublexical regularities are stored and processed within the same fronto-temporal network that supports lexical and syntactic processes.

neurosciences
High-level language brain regions are sensitive to sub-lexical regularities

Tamar I. Regev,Josef Affourtit,Xuanyi Chen,Abigail E. Schipper,Leon Bergen,Kyle Mahowald,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.11.447786

2021-06-11

Abstract:ABSTRACT A network of left frontal and temporal brain regions supports ‘high-level’ language processing— including the processing of word meanings, as well as word-combinatorial processing—across presentation modalities. This ‘core’ language network has been argued to store our knowledge of words and constructions as well as constraints on how those combine to form sentences. However, our linguistic knowledge additionally includes information about sounds (phonemes) and how they combine to form clusters, syllables, and words. Is this knowledge of phoneme combinatorics also represented in these language regions? Across five fMRI experiments, we investigated the sensitivity of high-level language processing brain regions to sub-lexical linguistic sound patterns by examining responses to diverse nonwords—sequences of sounds/letters that do not constitute real words (e.g., punes, silory, flope). We establish robust responses in the language network to visually (Experiment 1a, n=605) and auditorily (Experiments 1b, n=12, and 1c, n=13) presented nonwords relative to baseline. In Experiment 2 (n=16), we find stronger responses to nonwords that obey the phoneme-combinatorial constraints of English. Finally, in Experiment 3 (n=14) and a post-hoc analysis of Experiment 2, we provide suggestive evidence that the responses in Experiments 1 and 2 are not due to the activation of real words that share some phonology with the nonwords. The results suggest that knowledge of phoneme combinatorics and representations of sub-lexical linguistic sound patterns are stored within the same fronto-temporal network that stores higher-level linguistic knowledge and supports word and sentence comprehension.
The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain

Evelina Fedorenko,Anna A. Ivanova,Tamar I. Regev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00802-4

IF: 38.755

2024-04-12

Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract:Language behaviour is complex, but neuroscientific evidence disentangles it into distinct components supported by dedicated brain areas or networks. In this Review, we describe the 'core' language network, which includes left-hemisphere frontal and temporal areas, and show that it is strongly interconnected, independent of input and output modalities, causally important for language and language-selective. We discuss evidence that this language network plausibly stores language knowledge and supports core linguistic computations related to accessing words and constructions from memory and combining them to interpret (decode) or generate (encode) linguistic messages. We emphasize that the language network works closely with, but is distinct from, both lower-level — perceptual and motor — mechanisms and higher-level systems of knowledge and reasoning. The perceptual and motor mechanisms process linguistic signals, but, in contrast to the language network, are sensitive only to these signals' surface properties, not their meanings; the systems of knowledge and reasoning (such as the system that supports social reasoning) are sometimes engaged during language use but are not language-selective. This Review lays a foundation both for in-depth investigations of these different components of the language processing pipeline and for probing inter-component interactions.

neurosciences
Neural Correlates of Semantic and Phonological Processing Revealed by Functional Connectivity Patterns in the Language Network

Mengxia Yu,Zhe Wu,Mengkai Luan,Xu Wang,Yiying Song,Jia Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.027

IF: 3.054

2018-01-01

Neuropsychologia

Abstract:Semantics and phonology are fundamental components of language. Neuroimaging studies have identified a language network (LN) that is distributed through multiple regions and exhibits preferential responses to semantic and phonological information. However, it is unclear how these regions work collaboratively to support the processing of these components. In the present study, we first defined the LN as voxels that responded more to sentences than to strings of Chinese pseudo-characters. We subsequently used a voxel-based global brain connectivity method based on resting-state functional connectivity (FC) to characterize the neural correlates of semantic and phonological processing. We specifically correlated the within-network connectivity (WNC) of each voxel in the LN with the participants’ scores on the semantic and phonological components extracted from a battery of reading tests via principal component analysis. We found that individuals with stronger WNC in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus (lpSTG) and anterior superior temporal gyrus (laSTG) were better at semantic and phonological processing, respectively. Furthermore, the FC of the lpSTG with the laSTG and bilateral fusiform gyrus mainly contributed to semantic processing, whereas the FC of the laSTG with the left posterior middle temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus largely contributed to phonological processing. Importantly, the semantic and phonological subnetworks overlapped in the laSTG, the WNC of which correlated with the participants’ performances during semantic-phonological interactions. Our study revealed the hub and subnetwork for semantic and phonological processing, respectively, and highlighted the role of the laSTG in semantic-phonological interactions.
The domain-general multiple demand (MD) network does not support core aspects of language comprehension: a large-scale fMRI investigation

Evgeniia Diachek,Idan Blank,Matthew Siegelman,Josef Affourtit,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/744094

2019-08-22

Abstract:Abstract Aside from the language-selective left-lateralized fronto-temporal network, language comprehension sometimes additionally recruits a domain-general bilateral fronto-parietal network implicated in executive functions: the multiple demand (MD) network. However, the nature of the MD network’s contributions to language comprehension remains debated. To illuminate the role of this network in language processing, we conducted a large-scale fMRI investigation using data from 30 diverse word and sentence comprehension experiments (481 unique participants, 678 scanning sessions). In line with prior findings, the MD network was active during many language tasks. Moreover, similar to the language-selective network, which is robustly lateralized to the left hemisphere, these responses were stronger in the left-hemisphere MD regions. However, in stark contrast with the language-selective network, the MD network responded more strongly (i) to lists of unconnected words than to sentences, and critically, (ii) in paradigms with an explicit task compared to passive comprehension paradigms. In fact, many passive comprehension tasks failed to elicit a response above the fixation baseline in the MD network, in contrast to strong responses in the language-selective network. In tandem, these results argue against a role for the MD network in core aspects of sentence comprehension like inhibiting irrelevant meanings or parses, keeping intermediate representations active in working memory, or predicting upcoming words or structures. These results align with recent evidence of relatively poor tracking of the linguistic signal by the MD regions during naturalistic comprehension, and instead suggest that the MD network’s engagement during language processing likely reflects effort associated with extraneous task demands. Significance Statement Domain-general executive processes, like working memory and cognitive control, have long been implicated in language comprehension, including in neuroimaging studies that have reported activation in domain-general multiple demand (MD) regions for linguistic manipulations. However, much prior evidence has come from paradigms where language interpretation is accompanied by extraneous tasks. Using a large fMRI dataset (30 experiments/481 participants/678 sessions), we demonstrate that MD regions are engaged during language comprehension in the presence of task demands, but not during passive reading/listening—conditions that strongly activate the fronto-temporal language network. These results present a fundamental challenge to proposals whereby linguistic computations, like inhibiting irrelevant meanings, keeping representations active in working memory, or predicting upcoming elements, draw on domain-general executive resources.
Distributed Sensitivity to Syntax and Semantics throughout the Language Network

Cory Shain,Hope Kean,Colton Casto,Benjamin Lipkin,Josef Affourtit,Matthew Siegelman,Francis Mollica,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02164

2024-04-22

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract:Abstract Human language is expressive because it is compositional: the meaning of a sentence (semantics) can be inferred from its structure (syntax). It is commonly believed that language syntax and semantics are processed by distinct brain regions. Here we revisit this claim using precision fMRI methods to capture separation or overlap of function in the brains of individual participants. Contrary to prior claims, we find distributed sensitivity to both syntax and semantics throughout a broad frontotemporal brain network. Our results join a growing body of evidence for an integrated network for language in the human brain within which internal specialization is primarily a matter of degree rather than kind, in contrast with influential proposals that advocate distinct specialization of different brain areas for different types of linguistic functions.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences
Lexical-Semantic Content, Not Syntactic Structure, Is the Main Contributor to ANN-Brain Similarity of fMRI Responses in the Language Network

Carina Kauf,Greta Tuckute,Roger Levy,Jacob Andreas,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00116

2024-04-01

Abstract:Representations from artificial neural network (ANN) language models have been shown to predict human brain activity in the language network. To understand what aspects of linguistic stimuli contribute to ANN-to-brain similarity, we used an fMRI data set of responses to n = 627 naturalistic English sentences (Pereira et al., 2018) and systematically manipulated the stimuli for which ANN representations were extracted. In particular, we (i) perturbed sentences' word order, (ii) removed different subsets of words, or (iii) replaced sentences with other sentences of varying semantic similarity. We found that the lexical-semantic content of the sentence (largely carried by content words) rather than the sentence's syntactic form (conveyed via word order or function words) is primarily responsible for the ANN-to-brain similarity. In follow-up analyses, we found that perturbation manipulations that adversely affect brain predictivity also lead to more divergent representations in the ANN's embedding space and decrease the ANN's ability to predict upcoming tokens in those stimuli. Further, results are robust as to whether the mapping model is trained on intact or perturbed stimuli and whether the ANN sentence representations are conditioned on the same linguistic context that humans saw. The critical result-that lexical-semantic content is the main contributor to the similarity between ANN representations and neural ones-aligns with the idea that the goal of the human language system is to extract meaning from linguistic strings. Finally, this work highlights the strength of systematic experimental manipulations for evaluating how close we are to accurate and generalizable models of the human language network.
Transcriptional Regulation of the espGenes of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

F. Beltrametti,A. Kresse,C. Guzmán

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.181.11.3409-3418.1999

IF: 3.2

1999-06-01

Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract:ABSTRACT We have determined that the genes encoding the secreted proteins EspA, EspD, and EspB of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli(EHEC) are organized in a single operon. The esp operon is controlled by a promoter located 94 bp upstream from the ATG start codon of the espA gene. The promoter is activated in the early logarithmic growth phase, upon bacterial contact with eukaryotic cells and in response to Ca2+, Mn2+, and HEPES. Transcription of the esp operon seems to be switched off in tightly attached bacteria. The activation process is regulated by osmolarity (induction at high osmolarities), modulated by temperature, and influenced by the degree of DNA supercoiling. Transcription is ςS dependent, and the H-NS protein contributes to its fine tuning. Identification of the factors involved in activation of the esp operon and the signals responsible for modulation may facilitate understanding of the underlying molecular events leading to sequential expression of virulence factors during natural infections caused by EHEC.
Functionally distinct language and Theory of Mind networks are synchronized at rest and during language comprehension.

I. Blank,Evelina Fedorenko,Alexander Paunov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00619.2018

2019-04-01

Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract:Communication requires the abilities to generate and interpret utterances and to infer the beliefs, desires, and goals of others ("Theory of Mind"; ToM). These two abilities have been shown to dissociate: individuals with aphasia retain the ability to think about others' mental states; and individuals with autism are impaired in social reasoning, but their basic language processing is often intact. In line with this evidence from brain disorders, functional MRI (fMRI) studies have shown that linguistic and ToM abilities recruit distinct sets of brain regions. And yet, language is a social tool that allows us to share thoughts with one another. Thus, the language and ToM brain networks must share information despite being implemented in distinct neural circuits. Here, we investigated potential interactions between these networks during naturalistic cognition using functional correlations in fMRI. The networks were functionally defined in individual participants, in terms of preference for sentences over nonwords for language, and for belief inference over physical-event processing for ToM, with both a verbal and a nonverbal paradigm. Although, across experiments, interregion correlations within each network were higher than between-network correlations, we also observed above-baseline synchronization of blood oxygenation level-dependent signal fluctuations between the two networks during rest and story comprehension. This synchronization was functionally specific: neither network was synchronized with the executive control network (functionally defined in terms of preference for a harder over easier version of an executive task). Thus, coordination between the language and ToM networks appears to be an inherent and specific characteristic of their functional architecture. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Humans differ from nonhuman primates in their abilities to communicate linguistically and to infer others' mental states. Although linguistic and social abilities appear to be interlinked onto- and phylogenetically, they are dissociated in the adult human brain. Yet successful communication requires language and social reasoning to work in concert. Using functional MRI, we show that language regions are synchronized with social regions during rest and language comprehension, pointing to a possible mechanism for internetwork interaction.

Psychology,Medicine
The Human Language Effective Connectome.

Edmund T. Rolls,Gustavo Deco,Chu-Chung Huang,Jianfeng Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119352

IF: 5.7

2022-01-01

NeuroImage

Abstract:To advance understanding of brain networks involved in language, the effective connectivity between 26 cortical regions implicated in language by a community analysis and 360 cortical regions was measured in 171 humans from the Human Connectome Project, and complemented with functional connectivity and diffusion tractography, all using the HCP multimodal parcellation atlas. A (semantic) network (Group 1) involving inferior cortical regions of the superior temporal sulcus cortex (STS) with the adjacent inferior temporal visual cortex TE1a and temporal pole TG, and the connected parietal PGi region, has effective connectivity with inferior temporal visual cortex (TE) regions; with parietal PFm which also has visual connectivity; with posterior cingulate cortex memory-related regions; with the frontal pole, orbitofrontal cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex; with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; and with 44 and 45 for output regions. It is proposed that this system can build in its temporal lobe (STS and TG) and parietal parts (PGi and PGs) semantic representations of objects incorporating especially their visual and reward properties. Another (semantic) network (Group 3) involving superior regions of the superior temporal sulcus cortex and more superior temporal lobe regions including STGa, auditory A5, TPOJ1, the STV and the Peri-Sylvian Language area (PSL) has effective connectivity with auditory areas (A1, A4, A5, Pbelt); with relatively early visual areas involved in motion, e.g., MT and MST, and faces/words (FFC); with somatosensory regions (frontal opercular FOP, insula and parietal PF); with other TPOJ regions; and with the inferior frontal gyrus regions (IFJa and IFSp). It is proposed that this system builds semantic representations specialising in auditory and related facial motion information useful in theory of mind and somatosensory / body image information, with outputs directed not only to regions 44 and 45, but also to premotor 55b and midcingulate premotor cortex. Both semantic networks (Groups 1 and 3) have access to the hippocampal episodic memory system via parahippocampal TF. A third largely frontal network (Group 2) (44, 45, 47l; 55b; the Superior Frontal Language region SFL; and including temporal pole TGv) receives effective connectivity from the two semantic systems, and is implicated in syntax and speech output.
No evidence of theory of mind reasoning in the human language network

Cory Shain,Alexander Paunov,Xuanyi Chen,Benjamin Lipkin,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac505

2023-05-09

Abstract:Language comprehension and the ability to infer others' thoughts (theory of mind [ToM]) are interrelated during development and language use. However, neural evidence that bears on the relationship between language and ToM mechanisms is mixed. Although robust dissociations have been reported in brain disorders, brain activations for contrasts that target language and ToM bear similarities, and some have reported overlap. We take another look at the language-ToM relationship by evaluating the response of the language network, as measured with fMRI, to verbal and nonverbal ToM across 151 participants. Individual-participant analyses reveal that all core language regions respond more strongly when participants read vignettes about false beliefs compared to the control vignettes. However, we show that these differences are largely due to linguistic confounds, and no such effects appear in a nonverbal ToM task. These results argue against cognitive and neural overlap between language processing and ToM. In exploratory analyses, we find responses to social processing in the "periphery" of the language network-right-hemisphere homotopes of core language areas and areas in bilateral angular gyri-but these responses are not selectively ToM-related and may reflect general visual semantic processing.
Expanding the language network: Domain-specific hippocampal recruitment during high-level linguistic processing

Idan A. Blank,Melissa C. Duff,Sarah Brown-Schmidt,Evelina Fedorenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/091900

2016-12-06

Abstract:Abstract Language processing requires us to encode linear relations between acoustic forms and map them onto hierarchical relations between meaning units. Such relational binding of linguistic elements might recruit the hippocampus given its engagement by similar operations in other cognitive domains. Historically, hippocampal engagement in online language use has received little attention because patients with hippocampal damage are not aphasic. However, recent studies have found that these patients exhibit language impairments when the demands on flexible relational binding are high, suggesting that the hippocampus does, in fact, contribute to linguistic processing. A fundamental question is thus whether language processing engages domain-general hippocampal mechanisms that are also recruited across other cognitive processes or whether, instead, it relies on certain language-selective areas within the hippocampus. To address this question, we conducted the first systematic analysis of hippocampal engagement during comprehension in healthy adults ( n =150 across three experiments) using fMRI. Specifically, we functionally localized putative “language-regions” within the hippocampus using a language comprehension task, and found that these regions (i) were selectively engaged by language but not by six non-linguistic tasks; and (ii) were coupled in their activity with the cortical language network during both “rest” and especially story comprehension, but not with the domain-general “multiple-demand (MD)” network. This functional profile did not generalize to other hippocampal regions that were localized using a non-linguistic, working memory task. These findings suggest that some hippocampal mechanisms that maintain and integrate information during language comprehension are not domain-general but rather belong to the language-specific brain network. Significance statement According to popular views, language processing is exclusively supported by neocortical mechanisms. However, recent patient studies suggest that language processing may also require the hippocampus, especially when relations among linguistic elements have to be flexibly integrated and maintained. Here, we address a core question about the place of the hippocampus in the cognitive architecture of language: are certain hippocampal operations language-specific rather than domain-general? By extensively characterizing hippocampal recruitment during language comprehension in healthy adults using fMRI, we show that certain hippocampal subregions exhibit signatures of language specificity in both their response profiles and their patterns of activity synchronization with known functional regions in the neocortex. We thus suggest that the hippocampus is a satellite constituent of the language network.
Network Analysis of Human Brain Connectivity Reveals Neural Fingerprints of a Compositionality Bias in Signaling Systems

Massimo Lumaca,Peter Vuust,Giosuè Baggio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab307

2022-04-05

Abstract:Compositionality is a hallmark of human language and other symbolic systems: a finite set of meaningful elements can be systematically combined to convey an open-ended array of ideas. Compositionality is not uniformly distributed over expressions in a language or over individuals' communicative behavior: at both levels, variation is observed. Here, we investigate the neural bases of interindividual variability by probing the relationship between intrinsic characteristics of brain networks and compositional behavior. We first collected functional resting-state and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data from a large participant sample (N = 51). Subsequently, participants took part in two signaling games. They were instructed to learn and reproduce an auditory symbolic system of signals (tone sequences) associated with affective meanings (human faces expressing emotions). Signal-meaning mappings were artificial and had to be learned via repeated signaling interactions. We identified a temporoparietal network in which connection length was related to the degree of compositionality introduced in a signaling system by each player. Graph-theoretic analysis of resting-state functional connectivity revealed that, within that network, compositional behavior was associated with integration measures in 2 semantic hubs: the left posterior cingulate cortex and the left angular gyrus. Our findings link individual variability in compositional biases to variation in the anatomy of semantic networks and in the functional topology of their constituent units.
Resting functional connectivity of language networks: characterization and reproducibility

D Tomasi,N D Volkow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.177

IF: 11

2012-01-03

Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract:The neural basis of language comprehension and production has been associated with superior temporal (Wernicke's) and inferior frontal (Broca's) cortical areas, respectively. However, recent resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) and lesion studies have implicated a more extended network in language processing. Using a large RSFC data set from 970 healthy subjects and seed regions in Broca's and Wernicke's, we recapitulate this extended network that includes not only adjoining prefrontal, temporal and parietal regions but also bilateral caudate and left putamen/globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus. We also show that the language network has predominance of short-range functional connectivity (except posterior Wernicke's area that exhibited predominant long-range connectivity), which is consistent with reliance on local processing. Predominantly, long-range connectivity was left lateralized (except anterior Wernicke's area that exhibited rightward lateralization). The language network also exhibited anti-correlated activity with auditory (only for Wernicke's area) and visual cortices that suggests integrated sequential activity with regions involved with listening or reading words. Assessment of the intra-subject's reproducibility of this network and its characterization in individuals with language dysfunction is required to determine its potential as a biomarker for language disorders.

biochemistry & molecular biology,neurosciences,psychiatry
Direct monitoring of capillary perfusion following normovolemic hemodilution in an experimental skin-flap model.

J. Barker,F. Hammersen,T. Galla,I. Bondàr,P. Zeller,M. Menger,K. Messmer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199011000-00018

1990-11-01

Abstract:The effects of normovolemic hemodilution on skin flap survival are studied in a recently developed skin-flap model (homozygous hairless mouse ear) in which nutritional capillary flow is monitored directly by means of intravital microscopy from the time of flap creation throughout the establishment of necrosis. Two diluting agents (dextran 60 and hydroxyethyl starch 200) are utilized. Our quantitative findings demonstrate that the amount of nonperfused tissue following flap creation in both the dextran (n = 23) and starch (n = 13) groups was significantly decreased as compared with controls (n = 19). Our qualitative observations suggest that improved hemorrheologic properties at the microcirculatory level are responsible for the observed decreased necrosis. Various mechanisms by which hemodilution may act to prevent necrosis are discussed.
A left-lateralized dorsolateral prefrontal network for naming

Leyao Yu,Patricia Dugan,Werner Doyle,Orrin Devinsky,Daniel Friedman,Adeen Flinker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.15.594403

2024-05-16

Abstract:The ability to connect the form and meaning of a concept, known as word retrieval, is fundamental to human communication. While various input modalities could lead to identical word retrieval, the exact neural dynamics supporting this convergence relevant to daily auditory discourse remain poorly understood. Here, we leveraged neurosurgical electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings from 48 patients and dissociated two key language networks that highly overlap in time and space integral to word retrieval. Using unsupervised temporal clustering techniques, we found a semantic processing network located in the middle and inferior frontal gyri. This network was distinct from an articulatory planning network in the inferior frontal and precentral gyri, which was agnostic to input modalities. Functionally, we confirmed that the semantic processing network encodes word surprisal during sentence perception. Our findings characterize how humans integrate ongoing auditory semantic information over time, a critical linguistic function from passive comprehension to daily discourse.

Neuroscience
Cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar contributions to language processing: A meta-analytic review of 403 neuroimaging experiments.

Sabrina Turker,Philipp Kuhnke,Simon B Eickhoff,Svenja Caspers,Gesa Hartwigsen,Simon B. Eickhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000403

IF: 22.4

2023-09-28

Psychological Bulletin

Abstract:Language is a key human faculty for communication and interaction that provides invaluable insight into the human mind. Previous work has dissected different linguistic operations, but the large-scale brain networks involved in language processing are still not fully uncovered. Particularly, little is known about the subdomain-specific engagement of brain areas during semantic, syntactic, phonological, and prosodic processing and the role of subcortical and cerebellar areas. Here, we present the largest coordinate-based meta-analysis of language processing including 403 experiments. Overall, language processing primarily engaged bilateral fronto-temporal cortices, with the highest activation likelihood in the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Whereas we could not detect any syntax-specific regions, semantics specifically engaged left posterior temporal areas (left fusiform and occipitotemporal cortex) and the left frontal pole. Phonology showed highest subdomain-specificity in bilateral auditory and left postcentral regions, whereas prosody engaged specifically the right amygdala and the right IFG. Across all subdomains and modalities, we found strong bilateral subcortical and cerebellar contributions. Especially the right cerebellum was engaged during various processes, including speech production, visual, and phonological tasks. Collectively, our results emphasize consistent recruitment and high functional modularity for general language processing in bilateral domain-specific (temporo-frontal) and domain-general (medial frontal/anterior cingulate cortex) regions but also a high specialization of different subareas for different linguistic subdomains. Our findings refine current neurobiological models of language by adding novel insight into the general sensitivity of the language network and subdomain-specific functions of different brain areas and highlighting the role of subcortical and cerebellar regions for different language operations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, multidisciplinary
Linguistic input drives brain network configuration during language comprehension

Ileana Quiñones,Nicola Molinaro,César Caballero-Gaudes,Simona Mancini,Juan Andrés Hernández-Cabrera,Horacio Barber,Manuel Carreiras

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.915041

2020-01-23

Abstract:Abstract Assessing the synchrony and interplay between distributed neural regions is critical to understanding how language is processed. Here, we investigated possible neuro-functional links between form and meaning during sentence comprehension combining a classical whole-brain approach, which characterizes patterns of brain activation resulting from our experimental manipulation, and a novel multivariate network-based approach, which uses graph-theory measures to unravel the architectural configuration of the language system. Capitalizing on the Spanish gender agreement system, we experimentally manipulated formal and conceptual factors: whether the noun-adjective grammatical gender relationship was congruent or not and whether the noun gender type was semantically informative or strictly formal. Left inferior and middle frontal gyri, as well as left MTG/STG emerged as critical areas for the computation of grammatical relations. We demonstrate how the interface between formal and conceptual features depends on the synergic articulation of brain areas divided in three subnetworks that extend beyond the classical left-lateralized perisylvian language circuit. Critically, we isolated a subregion of the left angular gyrus showing a significant interaction between gender congruency and gender type. The functional interplay between the angular gyrus and left perisylvian language-specific circuit proves crucial for constructing coherent and meaningful messages. Importantly, using graph theory we show that this complex system is functionally malleable: the role each node plays within the network changes depending on the available linguistic cues. Significance Statement Neural networks can be described as graphs comprising distributed and interconnected nodes. These nodes share functional properties but also differ in terms of functional specialization and the number of interconnections mediating the efficient transfer of information. Previous work has shown functional connectivity differences based on graph-theory properties between typical and atypical samples. However, here we have used concepts from graph theory to characterize connectivity during language processing using task-related fMRI. This approach allowed us to demonstrate how linguistic input drives brain network configuration during language comprehension. This is the first evidence of functional flexibility in language networks: the communicative capacity of each hub changes depending on whether the linguistic input grants access to meaning or is purely formal.

Hypoxia inhibits induction of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity in topminnow hepatocarcinoma cells in an ARNT-dependent manner.

Delta-band Neural Activity Primarily Tracks Sentences Instead of Semantic Properties of Words

Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and Theory of Mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach

High-level language brain regions process sublexical regularities

High-level language brain regions are sensitive to sub-lexical regularities

The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain

Neural Correlates of Semantic and Phonological Processing Revealed by Functional Connectivity Patterns in the Language Network

The domain-general multiple demand (MD) network does not support core aspects of language comprehension: a large-scale fMRI investigation

Distributed Sensitivity to Syntax and Semantics throughout the Language Network

Lexical-Semantic Content, Not Syntactic Structure, Is the Main Contributor to ANN-Brain Similarity of fMRI Responses in the Language Network

Transcriptional Regulation of the espGenes of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

Functionally distinct language and Theory of Mind networks are synchronized at rest and during language comprehension.

The Human Language Effective Connectome.

No evidence of theory of mind reasoning in the human language network

Expanding the language network: Domain-specific hippocampal recruitment during high-level linguistic processing

Network Analysis of Human Brain Connectivity Reveals Neural Fingerprints of a Compositionality Bias in Signaling Systems

Resting functional connectivity of language networks: characterization and reproducibility

Direct monitoring of capillary perfusion following normovolemic hemodilution in an experimental skin-flap model.

A left-lateralized dorsolateral prefrontal network for naming

Cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar contributions to language processing: A meta-analytic review of 403 neuroimaging experiments.

Linguistic input drives brain network configuration during language comprehension