Casein, phosphopeptones and phosphoserine protect rats against the mycotoxin, sporidesmin.

E. Hove,D. E. Wright

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(69)90450-0

1969-05-01

Life Science

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena

Erin P Finley,Alexis K Huynh,Melissa M Farmer,Bevanne Bean-Mayberry,Tannaz Moin,Sabine M Oishi,Jessica L Moreau,Karen E Dyer,Holly Jordan Lanham,Luci Leykum,Alison B Hamilton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y

2018-11-27

Abstract:Background: Ethnography has been proposed as a valuable method for understanding how implementation occurs within dynamic healthcare contexts, yet this method can be time-intensive and challenging to operationalize in pragmatic implementation. The current study describes an ethnographically-informed method of guided discussions developed for use by a multi-project national implementation program. Methods: The EMPOWER QUERI is conducting three projects to implement innovative care models in VA women's health for high-priority health concerns - prediabetes, cardiovascular risk, and mental health - utilizing the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) implementation strategy enhanced with stakeholder engagement and complexity science. Drawing on tenets of ethnographic research, we developed a lightly-structured method of guided "periodic reflections" to aid in documenting implementation phenomena over time. Reflections are completed as 30-60 min telephone discussions with implementation team members at monthly or bi-monthly intervals, led by a member of the implementation core. Discussion notes are coded to reflect key domains of interest and emergent themes, and can be analyzed singly or in triangulation with other qualitative and quantitative assessments to inform evaluation and implementation activities. Results: Thirty structured reflections were completed across the three projects during a 15-month period spanning pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainment activities. Reflections provide detailed, near-real-time information on projects' dynamic implementation context, including characteristics of implementation settings and changes in the local or national environment, adaptations to the intervention and implementation plan, and implementation team sensemaking and learning. Reflections also provide an opportunity for implementation teams to engage in recurring reflection and problem-solving. Conclusions: To implement new, complex interventions into dynamic organizations, we must better understand the implementation process as it unfolds in real time. Ethnography is well suited to this task, but few approaches exist to aid in integrating ethnographic insights into implementation research. Periodic reflections show potential as a straightforward and low-burden method for documenting events across the life cycle of an implementation effort. They offer an effective means for capturing information on context, unfolding process and sensemaking, unexpected events, and diverse viewpoints, illustrating their value for use as part of an ethnographically-minded implementation approach. Trial registration: The two implementation research studies described in this article have been registered as required: Facilitating Cardiovascular Risk Screening and Risk Reduction in Women Veterans (NCT02991534); and Implementation of Tailored Collaborative Care for Women Veterans (NCT02950961).
Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER) 2.0 QUERI: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial

Alison B Hamilton,Erin P Finley,Bevanne Bean-Mayberry,Ariel Lang,Sally G Haskell,Tannaz Moin,Melissa M Farmer,EMPOWER QUERI Team

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00389-w

2023-03-08

Abstract:Background: Women Veterans are the fastest-growing segment of Veterans Health Administration (VA) users. The VA has invested heavily in delivering care for women Veterans that is effective, comprehensive, and gender-tailored. However, gender disparities persist in cardiovascular (CV) and diabetes risk factor control, and the rate of perinatal depression among women Veterans is higher than that among civilian women. Challenges such as distance, rurality, negative perception of VA, discrimination (e.g., toward sexual and/or gender minority individuals), and harassment on VA grounds can further impede women's regular use of VA care. Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER) 2.0 builds on work to date by expanding access to evidence-based, telehealth preventive and mental health services for women Veterans with high-priority health conditions in rural and urban-isolation areas. Methods: EMPOWER 2.0 will evaluate two implementation strategies, Replicating Effective Practices (REP) and Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI), in supporting the implementation and sustainment of three evidence-based interventions (Virtual Diabetes Prevention Program; Telephone Lifestyle Coaching Program; and Reach Out, Stay Strong Essentials) focused on preventive and mental health care for women Veterans. We will conduct a mixed-methods implementation evaluation using a cluster-randomized hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial design to compare the effectiveness of REP and EBQI on improved access to and rates of engagement in telehealth preventive lifestyle and mental health services. Other outcomes of interest include (a) VA performance metrics for telehealth care delivery and related clinical outcomes; (b) progression along the Stages of Implementation Completion; (c) adaptation, sensemaking, and experiences of implementation among multilevel stakeholders; and (d) cost and return on investment. We will also generate implementation playbooks for program partners to support scale-up and spread of these and future evidence-based women's health programs and policies. Discussion: EMPOWER 2.0 provides a model for mixed-methods hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial design incorporating evaluation of performance metrics, implementation progress, stakeholder experience, and cost and return on investment, with the ultimate goal of improving access to evidence-based preventive and mental telehealth services for women Veterans with high-priority health conditions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05050266 . Registered on 20 September 2021.
Pressure‐flow relationships in the peripheral circulation of the dog with practolol

J. Green,John D. Moore,Edward S. Attix,R. Zelis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.1975.tb02369.x

1975-02-01

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract:1. The influence of practolol (a proposed β1‐adrenoreceptor antagonist) upon the pressure‐flow relationships in the peripheral circulation was studied in eight anaesthetized dogs during right heart by‐pass procedures.
Tracking implementation strategies in real-world settings: VA Office of Rural Health enterprise-wide initiative portfolio

Heather Schacht Reisinger,Sheila Barron,Erin Balkenende,Melissa Steffen,Kenda Steffensmeier,Chris Richards,Dan Ball,Emily E Chasco,Jennifer Van Tiem,Nicole L Johnson,DeShauna Jones,Julia E Friberg,Rachael Kenney,Jane Moeckli,Kanika Arora,Borsika Rabin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14377

2024-09-03

Abstract:Objective: To use a practical approach to examining the use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies by Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) dimensions for rural health innovations using annual reports on a diverse array of initiatives. Data sources and study setting: The Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Rural Health (ORH) funds initiatives designed to support the implementation and spread of innovations and evidence-based programs and practices to improve the health of rural Veterans. This study draws on the annual evaluation reports submitted for fiscal years 2020-2022 from 30 of these enterprise-wide initiatives (EWIs). Study design: Content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM framework conducted by the Center for the Evaluation of Enterprise-Wide Initiatives (CEEWI), a Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)-ORH partnered evaluation initiative. Data collection and extraction methods: CEEWI analysts conducted a content analysis of EWI annual evaluation reports submitted to ORH. Analysis included cataloguing reported implementation strategies by Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) dimensions (i.e., identifying strategies that were used to support each dimension) and labeling strategies using ERIC taxonomy. Descriptive statistics were conducted to summarize data. Principal findings: A total of 875 implementation strategies were catalogued in 73 reports. Across these strategies, 66 unique ERIC strategies were reported. EWIs applied an average of 12 implementation strategies (range 3-22). The top three ERIC clusters across all 3 years were Develop stakeholder relationships (21%), Use evaluative/iterative strategies (20%), and Train/educate stakeholders (19%). Most strategies were reported within the Implementation dimension. Strategy use among EWIs meeting the rurality benchmark were also compared. Conclusions: Combining the dimensions from the RE-AIM framework and the ERIC strategies allows for understanding the use of implementation strategies across each RE-AIM dimension. This analysis will support ORH efforts to spread and sustain rural health innovations and evidence-based programs and practices through targeted implementation strategies.
The in vivo invasion assay: preparation and handling of collection needles.

J. Wyckoff,B. Gligorijevic,D. Entenberg,J. Segall,J. Condeelis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot065912

2011-10-01

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Abstract:Analysis of the individual steps in metastasis is crucial if insights at the molecular level are to be linked to the cell biology of cancer. A technical hurdle to achieving the analysis of the individual steps of metastasis is the fact that, at the gross level, tumors are heterogeneous in both animal models and patients. Human primary tumors show extensive variation in all properties ranging from growth and morphology of the tumor through tumor-cell density in the blood and formation and growth of metastases. Methods capable of the direct visualization and analysis of tumor-cell behavior at single-cell resolution in vivo have become crucial in advancing the understanding of mechanisms of metastasis, the definition of microenvironment, and the markers related to both. High-resolution multiphoton imaging of tumors in vivo is a valuable tool in this regard. Because tumor cells have been found to be attracted to blood vessels, the in vivo invasion assay was developed to analyze which factors may stimulate invasion of these cells into the vessels. This protocol describes the preparation and handling of collection needles for the assay. A set of 33-gauge needles is used to create artificial or surrogate blood vessels that are injected into tumors, using a special holding device attached to a micromanipulator to stabilize the needle positions during and after insertion into the anesthetized animal. The needles are filled with Matrigel and various growth factors to determine which of these factors may influence the invading tumor cells.
Development and application of a qualitative rapid analysis framework in a hybrid trial within primary care

Mathieson,A.,Elvey,R.,Wilson,P.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076792

IF: 3.006

2024-07-26

BMJ Open

Abstract:Context In the context of iterative feedback loops to support real-time policy decision making, and an emphasis on speeding up adoption of evidence-based interventions, qualitative healthcare researchers are increasingly expected to produce rapid results and products. Traditional qualitative methods have been adapted for this purpose. Objective To develop and apply a rapid analysis framework in a process evaluation for the VICTORION-Spirit study; a ground-breaking hybrid trial examining real-world delivery of inclisiran—a cholesterol-lowering treatment—in primary care. Design We developed a rapid analysis framework, using a summary template, to analyse data from semistructured telephone interviews. Setting Primary care in Greater Manchester, UK. Participants Patients who had received inclisiran as part of the VICTORION-Spirit trial (56), providers delivering inclisiran (28) and representatives from the Academic Health Science Network (8) participated in the original study. Results The rapid analysis framework we developed and applied comprised six steps: (1) creating a summary template based on the five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains; (2) test-driving, refining and finalising the summary template; (3) completing the template soon after each interview using field notes; (4) discussing analysis as a team; (5) transferring summaries to a matrix; and (6) using the summary matrix to inform presentations and interim reports for stakeholders. Our rapid analysis framework saved time and improved efficiency, as we were able to feedback barriers to stakeholders in real time via presentations. Conclusions Rapid analysis in applied healthcare research can produce timely and trustworthy findings. Our rapid analysis framework would be useful within studies where there is a need to feedback to stakeholders and adjust implementation strategies accordingly in real time. Thus, supporting successful implementation efforts and accelerating adoption. Trial registration number NCT04807400, 19/03/2021.

medicine, general & internal
p30-Anti-p30 immune complexes: intravascular clearance and extravascular sequestration in rats bearing Moloney sarcoma.

J. Jennette,J. D. Feldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.121.5.1696

1978-11-01

Abstract:Complexes of 125I p30, a viral core polypeptide, and rat anti-p30 antibody, preformed in vitro, were injected into the heart of BN rats bearing Moloney sarcomas (MST) and of BN rats bearing an unrelated tumor or unexposed to tumor. Complexes were cleared from the circulation of MST-bearing rats more rapidly than from sera of controls and were almost completely eliminated after 30 hr. There was no relationship between rate of disappearance and size of tumor or levels of circulating complexes. Disappearance rates in rats with progressing and regressing tumors were similar. Uncomplexed labeled p30 was cleared from the circulation of tumor-bearing and control rats with kinetics similar to those of labeled complexes. Complexes were localized in the spleen of tumor-bearing and control rats, but much more in spleens of MST-bearing rats. No other tissues, including tumor, concentrated complexes, nor was there binding to peripheral blood and spleen cells. The data suggest that augmented clearance and sequestration were due to the formation of large insoluble complexes that were rapidly removed by the reticulo-endothelial system.
The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Impact Framework: Measuring the Real-world Impact of Implementation Science

Melissa Z. Braganza,Amy M. Kilbourne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06143-z

IF: 5.7

2020-09-01

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:BackgroundMeasuring the health, economic, and cultural gains generated by scientific investments is crucial to reducing waste and improving quality of care. To date, there is no comprehensive framework for assessing the multi-faceted contributions of implementation and quality improvement sciences towards quality, cost, and patient and provider experiences in health systems.ObjectiveWe describe the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Impact Framework and its application to QUERI investments.MethodsThe QUERI Impact Framework adapts and expands on metrics from the National Academy of Medicine, incorporating lessons learned from QUERI initiatives. The cross-cutting impact metrics reflect QUERI’s strategic methodology across five domains of impact (Alignment, Commitment, Tailoring, Informing the field, Observing healthcare changes and generating New questions/projects or ACTION). Key impact metrics, including the number of implementation facilities, number of staff trained, and number of patients served, were derived directly from health system performance plan goals. QUERI applied the Framework by conducting iterative rapid assessments of impacts for QUERI Program centers, which are implementation laboratories that support 3–7 initiatives aligned with a cross-disciplinary goal addressing a national priority.Key ResultsFrom October 2015 to September 2019, QUERI Programs supported implementation of 49 evidence-based practices and promising innovations across 465 facilities, including 15 facilities that are experiencing quality gaps. As part of these implementation efforts, the programs worked with 71 operations partners to develop 71 tools/toolkits/manuals and support training of 5147 VA staff, serving 250,159 Veterans.ConclusionsThe QUERI Impact Framework aligns multiple stakeholders at different levels of a health system around common metrics, which cross implementation science and quality improvement boundaries. The Framework supports a comprehensive assessment of the short-term and distal impacts of implementation efforts in a health system, allowing both research and operations leadership to understand the value of implementation and quality improvement investments to inform program and policy decisions.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Improving implementation and team communication by integrating a cystic fibrosis transition readiness (CF R.I.S.E.) program into electronic health records

Catherine Enochs,Amy G. Filbrun,Michelle Hjelm,Julie Lehrmann,Lisa Mullen,Rebeca Packard,Jessica Roach,Anna K. Saulitis,Samya Z. Nasr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27326

IF: 4.0899

2024-10-25

Pediatric Pulmonology

Abstract:Background The cystic fibrosis (CF) Responsibility. Independence. Self‐care. Education. (R.I.S.E.) program was developed to provide assessment and education, supporting transition readiness for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Lack of integration within electronic health records (EHR) was a barrier to implementation of CF R.I.S.E. University of Michigan was able to integrate CF R.I.S.E. into EHR. Aim To improve implementation and EHR documentation of CF R.I.S.E. module completion by pwCF across two (CF) programs from baseline (10.5%) to 75% per month in 6 months (January through June 2023). Methods Two CF programs utilized quality improvement (QI) methods and tools and ad hoc support by a CF Learning Network (QI) specialist. Eligibility included pwCF ≥16 years old seen in CF clinics who accepted CF R.I.S.E. participation. Beginning January 2, 2023, programs met in biweekly, virtual meetings to discuss implementation. Deidentified data were collected monthly tracking modules completed by pwCF and number of team members engaging with CF R.I.S.E. and documenting in EHR. Data timelines were baseline (November–December 2022), project period (January–June 2023), and post‐project (July–December 2023). Results Completion rates increased from baseline (10.5%) to 48% (range 33% to 81%) through December 2023. During the project, an average 7.7 team members completed an average 19.2 modules per month. Post‐project, an average 8 team members completed an average 16.5 modules per month. Conclusions This collaboration demonstrated how utilization of EHR allowed for successful CF R.I.S.E. improvement at both programs. Shared software utilization and QI initiatives may be a way to facilitate timely dissemination of best practices through learning health systems.

pediatrics,respiratory system
RE-AIM for rural health innovations: perceptions of (mis) alignment between the RE-AIM framework and evaluation reporting in the Department of Veterans Affairs Enterprise-Wide Initiatives program

Emily E Chasco,Jennifer Van Tiem,Nicole Johnson,Erin Balkenende,Melissa Steffen,DeShauna Jones,Julia E Friberg,Kenda Steffensmeier,Jane Moeckli,Kanika Arora,Borsika Adrienn Rabin,Heather Schacht Reisinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1278209

2024-04-09

Abstract:Background: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Rural Health (ORH) supports national VA program offices' efforts to expand health care to rural Veterans through its Enterprise-Wide Initiatives (EWIs) program. In 2017, ORH selected Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM), an implementation science framework, to structure the EWI evaluation and reporting process. As part of its mandate to improve EWI program evaluation, the Center for the Evaluation of Enterprise-Wide Initiatives conducted a qualitative evaluation to better understand EWI team' perceptions of, and barriers and facilitators to, the EWI evaluation process. Methods: We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with 48 team members (e.g., evaluators, program office leads, and field-based leads) representing 21 EWIs from April-December 2020. Questions focused on participants' experiences using strategies targeting each RE-AIM dimension. Interviews were inductively analyzed in MAXQDA. We also systematically reviewed 51 FY19-FY20 EWI annual reports to identify trends in misapplications of RE-AIM. Results: Participants had differing levels of experience with RE-AIM. While participants understood ORH's rationale for selecting a common framework to structure evaluations, the perceived misalignment between RE-AIM and EWIs' work emerged as an important theme. Concerns centered around 3 sub-themes: (1) (Mis)Alignment with RE-AIM Dimensions, (2) (Mis)Alignment between RE-AIM and the EWI, and (3) (Mis)Alignment with RE-AIM vs. other Theories, Models, or Frameworks. Participants described challenges differentiating between and operationalizing dimensions in unique contexts. Participants also had misconceptions about RE-AIM and its relevance to their work, e.g., that it was meant for established programs and did not capture aspects of initiative planning, adaptations, or sustainability. Less commonly, participants shared alternative models or frameworks to RE-AIM. Despite criticisms, many participants found RE-AIM useful, cited training as important to understanding its application, and identified additional training as a future need. Discussion: The selection of a shared implementation science framework can be beneficial, but also challenging when applied to diverse initiatives or contexts. Our findings suggest that establishing a common understanding, operationalizing framework dimensions for specific programs, and assessing training needs may better equip partners to integrate a shared framework into their evaluations.
Aligning quality improvement efforts and policy goals in a national integrated health system

Melissa Z Braganza,Elsa Pearson,Cecille Joan Avila,Dave Zlowe,John Øvretveit,Amy M Kilbourne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13944

Abstract:Objective: To describe the design and impact of a systematic, enterprise-wide process for engaging US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) leadership in prioritizing scarce implementation and evaluation resources. Data sources: From 2017 to 2021, the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) identified priorities from local, regional, and national leaders through qualitative discussions and a national survey and tracked impacts via reports generated from competitively funded initiatives addressing these priorities. Study design: Guided by the Learning Health System framework and QUERI Implementation Roadmap, QUERI engaged stakeholders to nominate and rank-order priorities, peer-reviewed and funded initiatives to scale up and spread evidence-based practices (EBPs) using theory-based implementation strategies, and evaluated the impact of these initiatives using the QUERI Impact Framework. Data collection/extraction methods: QUERI collected priority nominations through qualitative discussions and a web-based survey, and live voting was used to rank-order priorities. QUERI-funded teams regularly submitted progress reports describing the key activities, findings, and impacts of the quality improvement (QI) initiatives using a standardized form created in the VA Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). Principal findings: QUERI launched five QI initiatives to address priorities selected by VA leadership. In partnership with 28 health system leaders, these initiatives are implementing 10 EBPs across 53 sites, supporting 1055 VA employees in delivering evidence-based care. The success of these initiatives led to an expansion of QUERI's process to address 2021 VA leadership priorities: virtual care, health disparities, delayed or suppressed care due to COVID-19, employee burnout, long-term and home care options, and quality and cost of community care. Conclusions: QUERI, a unique program embedded in a national integrated health system, deployed a novel approach to inform policy making and enhance the real-world impact of research through prioritization of limited resources, rigorous peer-review, and assessment of impacts on the health system, employees, and Veterans.
Development of an Implementation Facilitation Strategy to Link Mental Health Screening and eHealth Intervention for Clients in Ryan White-Funded Clinics in Chicago

Tammy K Stump,Kristen Ethier,Lisa R Hirschhorn,Andrea Dakin,Nora Bouacha,Angela Freeman,Jacqueline Bannon,Walter Gómez,Judith T Moskowitz,Alida Bouris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002980

2022-07-01

Abstract:Background: To reduce the impact of depression on people living with HIV, we are implementing a clinic-based behavioral health screener and referral to Optimizing Resilience and Coping with HIV through Internet Delivery, an evidenced-based intervention. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify contextual barriers and facilitators in advance of implementation. Setting: Sixteen Chicagoland area Ryan White Medical Case Management sites. Methods: We conducted a sequential mixed-methods study with medical case managers and supervisors. Participants completed an online survey assessing Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains, scored on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) scale. Survey results informed a purposive sampling frame and interview protocol. Interviews were analyzed by rapid qualitative analysis. Results: On average, survey respondents (n = 58) slightly agreed with positive views of team culture, learning climate, and implementation readiness (mean = 3.80-3.87). Potential barriers included intervention complexity (mean = 3.47), needed human resources (mean = 2.71-3.33), and only slight agreement with relative advantage over existing screening/referral systems (mean = 3.09-3.71). Qualitative results (n = 15) identified low advantage for clinics with robust behavioral health systems but strong advantage in clinics without these services. Respondents identified system-wide training and monitoring strategies to facilitate implementation. Conclusions: Ryan White Medical Case Management sites are a generally favorable context for the implementation of the interventions. As illustrated in an implementation research logic model, barriers will be addressed through deploying strategies proposed to impact clinic- and individual-level outcomes, including electronic prompts (reduce complexity), training on Optimizing Resilience and Coping with HIV through Internet Delivery as a complement to other behavioral health services (increase relative advantage), and feedback during implementation (strengthen rewards/incentives).
Successful and sustained implementation of a behaviour-change informed strategy for emergency nurses: a multicentre implementation evaluation

Kate Curtis,Belinda Kennedy,Julie Considine,Margaret Murphy,Mary K Lam,Christina Aggar,Margaret Fry,Ramon Z Shaban,Sarah Kourouche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01383-7

2024-07-29

Abstract:Background: Implementing evidence that changes practice in emergency departments (EDs) is notoriously difficult due to well-established barriers including high levels of uncertainty arising from undifferentiated nature of ED patients, resource shortages, workload unpredictability, high staff turnover, and a constantly changing environment. We developed and implemented a behaviour-change informed strategy to mitigate these barriers for a clinical trial to implement the evidence-based emergency nursing framework HIRAID® (History including Infection risk, Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication, and reassessment) to reduce clinical variation, and increase safety and quality of emergency nursing care. Aim: To evaluate the behaviour-change-informed HIRAID® implementation strategy on reach, effectiveness, adoption, quality (dose, fidelity) and maintenance (sustainability). Methods: An effectiveness-implementation hybrid design including a step-wedge cluster randomised control trial (SW-cRCT) was used to implement HIRAID® with 1300 + emergency nurses across 29 Australian rural, regional, and metropolitan EDs. Evaluation of our behaviour-change informed strategy was informed by the RE-AIM Scoring Instrument and measured using data from (i) a post HIRAID® implementation emergency nurse survey, (ii) HIRAID® Instructor surveys, and (iii) twelve-week and 6-month documentation audits. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics to determine the level of each component of RE-AIM achieved. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis and used to understand the 'how' and 'why' of quantitative results. Results: HIRAID® was implemented in all 29 EDs, with 145 nurses undertaking instructor training and 1123 (82%) completing all four components of provider training at 12 weeks post-implementation. Modifications to the behaviour-change informed strategy were minimal. The strategy was largely used as intended with 100% dose and very high fidelity. We achieved extremely high individual sustainability (95% use of HIRAID® documentation templates) at 6 months and 100% setting sustainability at 3 years. Conclusion: The behaviour-change informed strategy for the emergency nursing framework HIRAID® in rural, regional, and metropolitan Australia was highly successful with extremely high reach and adoption, dose, fidelity, individual and setting sustainability across substantially variable clinical contexts. Trial registration: ANZCTR, ACTRN12621001456842 . Registered 25 October 2021.
Impact of Implementation Facilitation on the REACH VET Clinical Program for Veterans at Risk for Suicide

Sara J Landes,Bridget B Matarazzo,Jeffery A Pitcock,Karen L Drummond,Brandy N Smith,JoAnn E Kirchner,Kaily A Clark,Georgia R Gerard,Molly C Jankovsky,Lisa A Brenner,Mark A Reger,Aaron E Eagan,Rebecca Raciborski,Jacob Painter,James C Townsend,Susan M Jegley,Rajinder Sonia Singh,Jodie A Trafton,John F McCarthy,Ira R Katz,Sara J. Landes,Bridget B. Matarazzo,Jeffery A. Pitcock,Karen L. Drummond,Brandy N. Smith,JoAnn E. Kirchner,Kaily A. Clark,Georgia R. Gerard,Molly C. Jankovsky,Lisa A. Brenner,Mark A. Reger,Aaron E. Eagan,James C. Townsend,Susan M. Jegley,Jodie A. Trafton,John F. McCarthy,Ira R. Katz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230277

2024-03-06

Psychiatric Services

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national suicide prevention program, called Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), that uses a predictive algorithm to identify, attempt to reach, assess, and care for patients at the highest risk for suicide. The authors aimed to evaluate whether facilitation enhanced implementation of REACH VET at VHA facilities not meeting target completion rates.METHODS: In this hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 2 program evaluation, a quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to assess changes in implementation outcome measures evaluated 6 months before and 6 months after onset of facilitation of REACH VET implementation at 23 VHA facilities. Measures included percentages of patients with documented coordinator and provider acknowledgment of receipt, care evaluation, and outreach attempt. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare differences in REACH VET outcome measures before and after facilitation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with personnel and were explored via template analysis.RESULTS: Time had a significant effect in all outcomes models (p<0.001). An effect of facilitation was significant only for the outcome of attempted outreach. Patients identified by REACH VET had significantly higher odds of having a documented outreach attempt after facilitation of REACH VET implementation, compared with before facilitation. Site personnel felt supported and reported that the external facilitators were helpful and responsive.CONCLUSIONS: Facilitation of REACH VET implementation was associated with an improvement in outreach attempts to veterans identified as being at increased risk for suicide. Outreach is critical for engaging veterans in care.

public, environmental & occupational health,psychiatry,health policy & services
Patient and clinician perspectives of an eHealth intervention for supporting cancer treatment in the UK: mixed methods evaluation of the eRAPID randomised controlled trial

Warrington,L.,Holmes,M.,Gibson,A.,Peacock,R.,Rogers,Z.,Dickinson,S.,Holch,P.,Hewison,J.,Hulme,C.,Dawkins,B.,Woroncow,B.,Cucchi,V.,Hudson,E. M.,Brown,J.,Velikova,G.,Absolom,K.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078283

IF: 3.006

2024-11-09

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives During 2015–2018, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated eRAPID, an eHealth intervention designed to capture patient-reported symptoms online during cancer treatment. eRAPID provides patients with advice on when to self-manage or seek medical support. Clinicians accessed symptom reports within electronic patient records. 508 participants starting systemic cancer treatment were recruited and followed for 18 weeks. The intervention group (n=256) was asked to access eRAPID and complete weekly online symptom reports. Clinicians received training on accessing and interpreting symptom reports. Overall, eRAPID had a positive impact on patients' symptoms, quality of life and self-efficacy, particularly early in treatment and for patients with early-stage disease. Using mixed methods, we aimed to gather insight from patients and clinicians on how eRAPID worked to facilitate the interpretation of RCT findings. Methods Following a concurrent triangulation design, patient experiences of eRAPID were gathered via end-of-study interviews (n=45) and questionnaires (n=186). Clinician experiences were obtained by end-of-study interviews (n=18) and completion, throughout the trial, of feedback questionnaires (n=787 from n=55 clinicians). Framework analysis was applied to examine qualitative data and close-ended questions were descriptively summarised. Findings were mapped against results from the RCT. Setting Medical oncology services, UK cancer centre. Results Patient feedback indicated eRAPID was easy to use. Adherence to weekly reporting was influenced by health status, reminders, perceived value and clinical use. Patient-reported benefits of eRAPID included an enhanced connection with the hospital, provision of practical advice and personal monitoring, which provided reassurance and empowerment. Clinicians were positive about the potential for online symptom monitoring but had mixed levels of direct experience with using eRAPID during the trial. Patients echoed this and recommended more explicit clinician use of symptom data. Conclusions The mixed-method approach to capturing patient and clinician opinions provided valuable insight into the eRAPID intervention and complementary information on how the intervention was received and functioned.

medicine, general & internal
Identifying actionable strategies: using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed interviews to evaluate the implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening

Helen Lam,Michael Quinn,Toni Cipriano-Steffens,Manasi Jayaprakash,Emily Koebnick,Fornessa Randal,David Liebovitz,Blasé Polite,Karen Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00150-9

2021-05-31

Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:Abstract Background Many evidence-based interventions (EBIs) found to be effective in research studies often fail to translate into meaningful patient outcomes in practice. The purpose of this study was to identify facilitators and barriers that affect the implementation of three EBIs to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in an urban federally qualified health center (FQHC) and offer actionable recommendations to improve future implementation efforts. Methods We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to describe diverse stakeholders’ implementation experience. The interviews were conducted in the participant’s clinic, audio-taped, and professionally transcribed for analysis. Results We used the five CFIR domains and 39 constructs and subconstructs as a coding template to conduct a template analysis. Based on experiences with the implementation of three EBIs, stakeholders described barriers and facilitators related to the intervention characteristics, outer setting, and inner setting. Implementation barriers included (1) perceived burden and provider fatigue with EHR (Electronic Health Record) provider reminders, (2) unreliable and ineffectual EHR provider reminders, (3) challenges to providing health care services to diverse patient populations, (4) lack of awareness about CRC screening among patients, (5) absence of CRC screening goals, (6) poor communication on goals and performance, and (7) absence of printed materials for frontline implementers to educate patients. Implementation facilitators included (1) quarterly provider assessment and feedback reports provided real-time data to motivate change, (2) integration with workflow processes, (3) pressure from funding requirement to report quality measures, (4) peer pressure to achieve high performance, and (5) a culture of teamwork and patient-centered mentality. Conclusions The CFIR can be used to conduct a post-implementation formative evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators that influenced the implementation. Furthermore, the CFIR can provide a template to organize research data and synthesize findings. With its clear terminology and meta-theoretical framework, the CFIR has the potential to promote knowledge-building for implementation. By identifying the contextual determinants, we can then determine implementation strategies to facilitate adoption and move EBIs to daily practice.
Characterization and Crystal Structure of a Novel Two-dimensional Coordination Polymer: [Ni(bpdc)(bix)1.5·H2O]n

Linheng Wei,Zi-Liang Wang,Mingxue Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2011-0705

Abstract:The two-dimensional coordination polymer [Ni(bpdc)(bix)1.5 ·H2O]n (H2bpdc = 2,4’-biphenyldicarboxylic acid; bix = 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene) was hydrothermally synthesized and structurally characterized. In the tile compound, the octahedral coordination environment around the Ni2+ ion is established by two oxygen atoms from two bpdc2− anions, one water molecule and three nitrogen atoms from three bix ligands. One bix ligand in the asymmetric unit lies on an inversion center at 1, 0.5, 0.5, and the other bix molecule resides on a general position. Each of the two bix molecules is coordinated to four Ni2+ ions, forming a 52-membered ring which is further assembled into a one-dimensional tape structure running parallel to the [100] direction. By a combination of the O2 and O4 oxygen atoms of one bpdc2− anion coordinating two Ni2+ ions, adjacent tapes are joined together, forming a layer structure parallel to the (010) plane. A 22-membered ring is formed by means of two bpdc anions binding to two Ni2+ ions. Graphical Abstract Characterization and Crystal Structure of a Novel Two-dimensional Coordination Polymer: [Ni(bpdc)(bix)1.5·H2O]n
Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED): a protocol for an implementation study in the Veterans Health Administration

Mary Ersek,Anne Sales,Shimrit Keddem,Roman Ayele,Leah M Haverhals,Kate H Magid,Jennifer Kononowech,Andrew Murray,Joan G Carpenter,Mary Beth Foglia,Lucinda Potter,Jennifer McKenzie,Darlene Davis,Cari Levy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00321-2

2022-07-20

Abstract:Background: Empirical evidence supports the use of structured goals of care conversations and documentation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) preferences in durable, accessible, and actionable orders to improve the care for people living with serious illness. As the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) provides an excellent environment to test implementation strategies that promote this evidence-based practice. The Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED) program seeks to improve care outcomes for seriously ill Veterans by supporting efforts to conduct goals of care conversations, systematically document LST preferences, and ensure timely and accurate communication about preferences across VA and non-VA settings. Methods: PERSIVED encompasses two separate but related implementation projects that support the same evidence-based practice. Project 1 will enroll 12 VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs and Project 2 will enroll six VA Community Nursing Home (CNH) programs. Both projects begin with a pre-implementation phase during which data from diverse stakeholders are gathered to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of the LST evidence-based practice. This baseline assessment is used to tailor quality improvement activities using audit with feedback and implementation facilitation during the implementation phase. Site champions serve as the lynchpin between the PERSIVED project team and site personnel. PERSIVED teams support site champions through monthly coaching sessions. At the end of implementation, baseline site process maps are updated to reflect new steps and procedures to ensure timely conversations and documentation of treatment preferences. During the sustainability phase, intense engagement with champions ends, at which point champions work independently to maintain and improve processes and outcomes. Ongoing process evaluation, guided by the RE-AIM framework, is used to monitor Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance outcomes. Effectiveness will be assessed using several endorsed clinical metrics for seriously ill populations. Discussion: The PERSIVED program aims to prevent potentially burdensome LSTs by consistently eliciting and documenting values, goals, and treatment preferences of seriously ill Veterans. Working with clinical operational partners, we will apply our findings to HBPC and CNH programs throughout the national VA healthcare system during a future scale-out period.
Using FRAME Documentation to Achieve RE‐AIM Goals During Iterative, Stakeholder‐Engaged Refinement of a Family Management Intervention for Parents of Preterm Infants

Ashley M. Weber,Tamilyn Bakas,Richard Bailey,Qutaibah Oudat,Kristin C. Voos,Jared B. Rice,Nehal A. Parikh,Heather L. Tubbs‐Cooley,Josh Lambert,Matthew J. Rota,Heather C. Kaplan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16477

IF: 3.057

2024-11-24

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract:Aims To co‐identify adaptations with key stakeholders needed to optimise elements of a video‐based intervention (i.e., PREEMIE PROGRESS [PP]), which trains parents in evidence‐based family management skills to care for their very preterm infant in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Design Descriptive qualitative study oriented with a pragmatic philosophy, informed by the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE‐AIM) framework and the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications‐expanded (FRAME). Methods Semistructured interviews to identify potential adaptations with key stakeholders: family management researchers (n = 5), clinicians (n = 9), technology experts (n = 5) and parents of preterm infants (n = 17). Weekly design team meetings to select and implement high‐priority adaptations necessary for the next research phase. Monthly NICU parent partnership meetings to review adaptations and make recommendations for potential adaptations with conflicting data. Results Stakeholders (N = 36) suggested 98 potential adaptations: 32 (33.0%) were completed, 8 (8.2%) were abandoned, 5 (5.2%) have work that is ongoing and 52 (53.6%) were tabled for future research phases. Content adaptations (70, 71.4%) were the most frequently suggested adaptation type. Potential adaptations mostly addressed RE‐AIM dimensions of effectiveness (43, 43.9%), and implementation (46, 46.9%) and were directed at the parent (i.e., intervention recipient) level (79, 81.4%). Conclusion Use of the RE‐AIM framework ensured we systematically identified needed adaptations with key stakeholders across a range of dimensions that would improve PP for parents now and in future phases of this research. Implications for the Profession Co‐identifying potential adaptations with key stakeholders, paired with FRAME documentation, can help nurses prioritise adaptations most appropriate for each phase of implementation. Impact Our paper highlights for nurse clinicians and researchers how FRAME documentation of potential adaptations can support stakeholder engagement and a systematic approach to incorporating adaptations throughout all phases of the research process, thereby shortening the evidence to practice gap. Reporting Method COREQ guidelines for qualitative reporting. Patient/Public Contribution The research team was supported by members of the NICU's Parent Partnership Council (PPC), whose mission is to promote family‐centred care improvement projects and research within the NICU. This committee is comprised of nursing, physician, allied health leadership and parents of infants previously hospitalised in the NICU. The NICU PPC met monthly to review conflicting data on potential adaptations and provide recommendations on adaptation decisions.

nursing
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis

Angela C. Wolff,Andrea Dresselhuis,Samar Hejazi,Duncan Dixon,Deborah Gibson,A. Fuchsia Howard,Sarah Liva,Barbara Astle,Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham,Vanessa K. Noonan,Lisa Edwards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2

2021-06-09

Systematic Reviews

Abstract:Abstract Background Substantial literature has highlighted the importance of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs, respectively) to collect clinically relevant information to better understand and address what matters to patients. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence about how healthcare providers implement individual-level PROMs and PREMs data into daily practice. Methods This mixed methods systematic review protocol describes the design of our synthesis of the peer-reviewed research evidence (i.e., qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods), systematic reviews, organizational implementation projects, expert opinion, and grey literature. Keyword synonyms for “PROMs,” PREMs,” and “implementation” will be used to search eight databases (i.e., MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Evidence-based Medicine Reviews, and ProQuest (Dissertation and Theses)) with limiters of English from 2009 onwards. Study selection criteria include implementation at the point-of-care by healthcare providers in any practice setting. Eligible studies will be critically appraised using validated tools (e.g., Joanna Briggs Institute). Guided by the review questions, data extraction and synthesis will occur simultaneously to identify biographical information and methodological characteristics as well as classify study findings related to implementation processes and strategies. As part of the narrative synthesis approach, two frameworks will be utilized: (a) Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify influential factors of PROMs and PREMs implementation and (b) Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to illicit strategies. Data management will be undertaken using NVivo 12 TM . Discussion Data from PROMs and PREMs are critical to adopt a person-centered approach to healthcare. Findings from this review will guide subsequent phases of a larger project that includes interviews and a consensus-building forum with end users to create guidelines for implementing PROMs and PREMs at the point of care. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020182904 .

medicine, general & internal

Casein, phosphopeptones and phosphoserine protect rats against the mycotoxin, sporidesmin.

Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena

Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER) 2.0 QUERI: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial

Pressure‐flow relationships in the peripheral circulation of the dog with practolol

Tracking implementation strategies in real-world settings: VA Office of Rural Health enterprise-wide initiative portfolio

The in vivo invasion assay: preparation and handling of collection needles.

Development and application of a qualitative rapid analysis framework in a hybrid trial within primary care

p30-Anti-p30 immune complexes: intravascular clearance and extravascular sequestration in rats bearing Moloney sarcoma.

The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Impact Framework: Measuring the Real-world Impact of Implementation Science

Improving implementation and team communication by integrating a cystic fibrosis transition readiness (CF R.I.S.E.) program into electronic health records

RE-AIM for rural health innovations: perceptions of (mis) alignment between the RE-AIM framework and evaluation reporting in the Department of Veterans Affairs Enterprise-Wide Initiatives program

Aligning quality improvement efforts and policy goals in a national integrated health system

Development of an Implementation Facilitation Strategy to Link Mental Health Screening and eHealth Intervention for Clients in Ryan White-Funded Clinics in Chicago

Successful and sustained implementation of a behaviour-change informed strategy for emergency nurses: a multicentre implementation evaluation

Impact of Implementation Facilitation on the REACH VET Clinical Program for Veterans at Risk for Suicide

Patient and clinician perspectives of an eHealth intervention for supporting cancer treatment in the UK: mixed methods evaluation of the eRAPID randomised controlled trial

Identifying actionable strategies: using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed interviews to evaluate the implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening

Characterization and Crystal Structure of a Novel Two-dimensional Coordination Polymer: [Ni(bpdc)(bix)1.5·H2O]n

Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED): a protocol for an implementation study in the Veterans Health Administration

Using FRAME Documentation to Achieve RE‐AIM Goals During Iterative, Stakeholder‐Engaged Refinement of a Family Management Intervention for Parents of Preterm Infants

Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis