A quantitative in situ hybridization protocol for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival post-mortem human brain tissue.

Chunqing Liu,L. Shan,R. Balesar,S. Luchetti,J. V. van Heerikhuize,Jian‐hong Luo,D. Swaab,A. Bao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.07.004

IF: 4.647

2010-12-01

Methods

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Optimization Methods and Implementation Science: An Opportunity for Behavioral and Biobehavioral Interventions

Kate Guastaferro,Linda M. Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895211054363

2021-01-01

Implementation Research and Practice

Abstract:This editorial introduces the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), a principled framework for the development, optimization and evaluation of multicomponent interventions, to the field of implementation science. We suggest that MOST may be integrated with implementation science to advance the field, moving closer towards the ultimate goal of disseminating effective interventions to those in need. We offer three potential ways MOST may advance implementation science: (1) development of an effective and immediately scalable intervention; (2) adaptation of interventions to local contexts; and (3) optimization of the implementation of an intervention itself. Our goal is to inspire the integration of MOST with implementation science across a number of public health contexts.
Moving beyond the treatment package approach to developing behavioral interventions: addressing questions that arose during an application of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST)

David L Wyrick,Kelly L Rulison,Melodie Fearnow-Kenney,Jeffrey J Milroy,Linda M Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0247-7

2014-01-23

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:ABSTRACTGiven current pressures to increase the public health contributions of behavioral interventions, intervention scientists may wish to consider moving beyond the classical treatment package approach that focuses primarily on achieving statistical significance. They may wish also to focus on goals directly related to optimizing public health impact. The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) is an innovative methodological framework that draws on engineering principles to achieve more potent behavioral interventions. MOST is increasingly being adopted by intervention scientists seeking a systematic framework to engineer an optimized intervention. As with any innovation, there are challenges that arise with early adoption. This article describes the solutions to several critical questions that we addressed during the first-ever iterative application of MOST. Specifically, we describe how we have applied MOST to optimize an online program (myPlaybook) for the prevention of substance use among college student-athletes. Our application of MOST can serve as a blueprint for other intervention scientists who wish to design optimized behavioral interventions. We believe using MOST is feasible and has the potential to dramatically improve program effectiveness thereby advancing the public health impact of behavioral interventions.

public, environmental & occupational health
The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) in Child Maltreatment Prevention Research

Kate Guastaferro,Jillian C. Strayhorn,Linda M. Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02062-7

2021-08-05

Journal of Child and Family Studies

Abstract:Each year hundreds of thousands of children and families receive behavioral interventions designed to prevent child maltreatment; yet rates of maltreatment have not declined in over a decade. To reduce the prevalence and prevent the life-long negative consequences of child maltreatment, behavioral interventions must not only be effective, but also affordable, scalable, and efficient to meet the demand for these services. An innovative approach to intervention science is needed. The purpose of this article is to introduce the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to the field of child maltreatment prevention. MOST is an engineering-inspired framework for developing, optimizing, and evaluating multicomponent behavioral interventions. MOST enables intervention scientists to empirically examine the performance of each intervention component, independently and in combination. Using a hypothetical example of a home visiting intervention and artificial data, this article demonstrates how MOST may be used to optimize the content of a parent-focused in-home intervention and the engagement strategies of an intervention to increase completion rate to identify an intervention that is effective, efficient, economical, and scalable. We suggest that MOST will ultimately improve prevention science and hasten the progress of translational science to prevent child maltreatment.

family studies,psychology, developmental,psychiatry
A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions

Vijay N. Nair,V. Strecher,L. Collins,S. Murphy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM3001_8

2005-08-01

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:Background: Although the optimization of behavioral interventions offers the potential of both public health and research benefits, currently there is no widely agreed-upon principled procedure for accomplishing this.Purpose: This article suggests a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) for achieving the dual goals of program optimization and program evaluation in the behavioral intervention field.Methods: MOST consists of the following three phases: (a) screening, in which randomized experimentation closely guided by theory is used to assess an array of program and/or delivery components and select the components that merit further investigation; (b) refining, in which interactions among the identified set of components and their interrelationships with covariates are investigated in detail, again via randomized experiments, and optimal dosage levels and combinations of components are identified; and (c) confirming, in which the resulting optimized intervention is evaluated by means of a standard randomized intervention trial. To make the best use of available resources, MOST relies on design and analysis tools that help maximize efficiency, such as fractional factorials.Results: A slightly modified version of an actual application of MOST to develop a smoking cessation intervention is used to develop and present the ideas.Conclusions: MOST has the potential to husband program development resources while increasing our understanding of the individual program and delivery components that make up interventions. Considerations, challenges, open questions, and other potential benefits are discussed.

Computer Science,Medicine,Psychology
The Multiphase Optimization Strategy for Engineering Effective Tobacco Use Interventions

Linda M. Collins,Timothy B. Baker,Robin J. Mermelstein,Megan E. Piper,Douglas E. Jorenby,Stevens S. Smith,Bruce A. Christiansen,Tanya R. Schlam,Jessica W. Cook,Michael C. Fiore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9253-x

2010-12-04

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is a new methodological approach for building, optimizing, and evaluating multicomponent interventions. Conceptually rooted in engineering, MOST emphasizes efficiency and careful management of resources to move intervention science forward steadily and incrementally. MOST can be used to guide the evaluation of research evidence, develop an optimal intervention (the best set of intervention components), and enhance the translation of research findings, particularly type II translation. This article uses an ongoing study to illustrate the application of MOST in the evaluation of diverse intervention components derived from the phase-based framework reviewed in the companion article by Baker et al. (Ann Behav Med, in press, 2011). The article also discusses considerations, challenges, and potential benefits associated with using MOST and similar principled approaches to improving intervention efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. The applicability of this methodology may extend beyond smoking cessation to the development of behavioral interventions for other chronic health challenges.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Evaluating individual intervention components: making decisions based on the results of a factorial screening experiment

Linda M Collins,Jessica B Trail,Kari C Kugler,Timothy B Baker,Megan E Piper,Robin J Mermelstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0239-7

2013-11-26

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:ABSTRACTThe multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is a framework for not only evaluating but also optimizing behavioral interventions. A tool critical for MOST is the screening experiment, which enables efficient gathering of information for deciding which components to include in an optimized intervention. This article outlines a procedure for making decisions based on data from a factorial screening experiment. The decision making procedure is illustrated with artificial data generated to resemble empirical data. The illustration suggests that this approach is useful for selecting intervention components and settings based on the results of a factorial screening experiment. It is important to develop methods for making decisions based on factorial screening experiments. The approach demonstrated here is potentially useful, but has limited generalizability. Future research should develop additional decision making procedures for a variety of situations.

public, environmental & occupational health
Intervention Optimization: A Paradigm Shift and Its Potential Implications for Clinical Psychology

Linda M. Collins,Inbal Nahum-Shani,Kate Guastaferro,Jillian C. Strayhorn,David J. Vanness,Susan A. Murphy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-051119

IF: 22.098

2024-02-05

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract:To build a coherent knowledge base about what psychological intervention strategies work, develop interventions that have positive societal impact, and maintain and increase this impact over time, it is necessary to replace the classical treatment package research paradigm. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is an alternative paradigm that integrates ideas from behavioral science, engineering, implementation science, economics, and decision science. MOST enables optimization of interventions to strategically balance effectiveness, affordability, scalability, and efficiency. In this review we provide an overview of MOST, discuss several experimental designs that can be used in intervention optimization, consider how the investigator can use experimental results to select components for inclusion in the optimized intervention, discuss the application of MOST in implementation science, and list future issues in this rapidly evolving field. We highlight the feasibility of adopting this new research paradigm as well as its potential to hasten the progress of psychological intervention science. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 20 is May 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

psychology, clinical
Optimizing Interventions for Equitability: Some Initial Ideas

Jillian C. Strayhorn,David J. Vanness,Linda M. Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-024-01644-3

2024-02-02

Prevention Science

Abstract:Interventions (including behavioral, biobehavioral, biomedical, and social-structural interventions) hold tremendous potential not only to improve public health overall but also to reduce health disparities and promote health equity. In this study, we introduce one way in which interventions can be optimized for health equity in a principled fashion using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). Specifically, we define intervention equitability as the extent to which the health benefits provided by an intervention are distributed evenly versus concentrated among those who are already advantaged, and we suggest that, if intervention equitability is acknowledged to be a priority, then equitability should be a key criterion that is balanced with other criteria (effectiveness overall, as well as affordability, scalability, and/or efficiency) in intervention optimization. Using a hypothetical case study and simulated data, we show how MOST can be applied to achieve a strategic balance that incorporates equitability. We also show how the composition of an optimized intervention can differ when equitability is considered versus when it is not. We conclude with a vision for next steps to build on this initial foray into optimizing interventions for equitability.

public, environmental & occupational health
Multiphase optimization of a multicomponent intervention for informal dementia caregivers: a study protocol

Jojo Yan Yan Kwok,Daphne Sze Ki Cheung,Steven Zarit,Karen Siu-Lan Cheung,Bobo Hi Po Lau,Vivian Weiqun Lou,Sheung-Tak Cheng,Dolores Gallagher-Thompson,Kee-Lee Chou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07801-3

IF: 2.728

2023-12-06

Trials

Abstract:Family caregiver interventions are essential to support dementia caregiving. However, such interventions are typically complex and consist of multiple components. Existing evidence rarely delineates the effectiveness and interactions between individual components. To optimise intervention, we adopt the multiphase optimisation strategy (MOST) to test the implementation fidelity and determine the effect of each component and the interactions between each component and the corresponding outcome.

medicine, research & experimental
Classifying Intervention Components Used in Sleep Duration Interventions for Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jessica E. Decker,Knashawn H. Morales,Maddy A. Fair,Giuliana Vallecorsa,Sanjana Subramanyam,Alexander G. Fiks,Stephanie Mayne,Ariel A. Williamson,Jonathan A. Mitchell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101995

IF: 11.401

2024-08-26

Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract:SUMMARY The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) is a three-phase iterative framework that could accelerate the development of behavioral interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted within the MOST preparation phase and aimed to classify components included in pediatric sleep duration interventions, using the Behavior Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy. Across 37 interventions, 46 out of 93 BCTs have been used, with an average of 8 techniques used per study. The most common BCTs used were instruction on how to perform the behavior (N=29; code 4.1), practical social support (N=22; code: 3.2), and behavioral practice/rehearsal (N=22; code: 8.1). A latent class analysis identified two classes of interventions, distinguished by the presence of BCTs falling within the following behavior change groups: shaping knowledge, natural consequences, comparison of behavior, and r epetition and substitution. Our meta-analysis revealed that interventions belonging to the latent class with these behavior change groups (N=15) had a pooled positive intervention effect of 14 minutes (95% CI: 8-21) versus 8 minutes (95% CI: 1-15) for interventions without these behavior change groups (N=19). This systematic review and meta-analysis will enhance the development of sleep promotion interventions and guide the selection of candidate intervention components for future optimization and randomized control trials.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
Decision-making in the multiphase optimization strategy: Applying decision analysis for intervention value efficiency to optimize an information leaflet to promote key antecedents of medication adherence

Sophie M C Green,Samuel G Smith,Linda M Collins,Jillian C Strayhorn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae029

2024-07-27

Abstract:Advances in the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) have suggested a new approach, decision analysis for intervention value efficiency (DAIVE), for selecting an optimized intervention based on the results of a factorial optimization trial. The new approach opens possibilities to select optimized interventions based on multiple valued outcomes. We applied DAIVE to identify an optimized information leaflet intended to support eventual adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with breast cancer. We used empirical performance data for five candidate leaflet components on three hypothesized antecedents of adherence: beliefs about the medication, objective knowledge about AET, and satisfaction with medication information. Using data from a 25 factorial trial (n = 1603), we applied the following steps: (i) We used Bayesian factorial analysis of variance to estimate main and interaction effects for the five factors on the three outcomes. (ii) We used posterior distributions for main and interaction effects to estimate expected outcomes for each leaflet version (32 total). (iii) We scaled and combined outcomes using a linear value function with predetermined weights indicating the relative importance of outcomes. (iv) We identified the leaflet that maximized the value function as the optimized leaflet, and we systematically varied outcome weights to explore robustness. The optimized leaflet included two candidate components, side-effects, and patient input, set to their higher levels. Selection was generally robust to weight variations consistent with the initial preferences for three outcomes. DAIVE enables selection of optimized interventions with the best-expected performance on multiple outcomes.
Using Multiphase Optimization Strategy and Human-Centered Design to Create an Integrated Model of Palliative Care Skills in Home-Based Physical Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure

Tamra Keeney,Cecilia Wu,Alicia Savini,Sarah Stone,Aniyah Travis,Ana-Maria Vranceanu,Karen Steinhauser,Joseph Greer,Amy M. Pastva,Christine Ritchie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2023.0476

2024-02-24

Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract:Background: Many older adults with advanced heart failure receive home health rehabilitation after hospitalization. Yet, integration of palliative care skills into rehabilitation is limited. Objective: Describe using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework with human-centered design principles to engage clinical partners in the Preparation phase of palliative physical therapy intervention development. Design: We convened a home-based physical therapy advisory team (four clinicians, three clinical leaders) to identify physical therapist needs and preferences for incorporating palliative care skills in rehabilitation and design an intervention prototype. Results: Between 2022 and 2023, we held five advisory team meetings. Initial feedback on palliative care skill preferences and training needs directly informed refinement of our conceptual model and skills in the intervention prototype. Later feedback focused on reviewing and revising intervention content, delivery strategy, and training considerations. Conclusion: Incorporating human-centered design principles within the MOST provided a useful framework to partner with clinical colleagues in intervention design.

health care sciences & services
Optimizing a community-engaged multi-level group intervention to reduce substance use: an application of the multiphase optimization strategy

Liliane Cambraia Windsor,Ellen Benoit,Douglas Smith,Rogério M Pinto,Kari C Kugler,Newark Community Collaborative Board (NCCB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2624-5

IF: 2.728

2018-04-27

Trials

Abstract:Background: Rates of alcohol and illicit drug use (AIDU) are consistently similar across racial groups (Windsor and Negi, J Addict Dis 28:258-68, 2009; Keyes et al. Soc Sci Med 124:132-41, 2015). Yet AIDU has significantly higher consequences for residents in distressed communities with concentrations of African Americans (DCAA - i.e., localities with high rates of poverty and crime) who also have considerably less access to effective treatment of substance use disorders (SUD). This project is optimizing Community Wise, an innovative multi-level behavioral-health intervention created in partnership with service providers and residents of distressed communities with histories of SUD and incarceration, to reduce health inequalities related to AIDU. Methods: Grounded in critical consciousness theory, community-based participatory research principles (CBPR), and the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study employs a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design to engineer the most efficient, effective, and scalable version of Community Wise that can be delivered for US$250 per person or less. This study is fully powered to detect change in AIDU in a sample of 528 men with a histories of SUD and incarceration, residing in Newark, NJ in the United States. A community collaborative board oversees recruitment using a variety of strategies including indigenous field worker sampling, facility-based sampling, community advertisement through fliers, and street outreach. Participants are randomly assigned to one of 16 conditions that include a combination of the following candidate intervention components: peer or licensed facilitator, group dialogue, personal goal development, and community organizing. All participants receive a core critical-thinking component. Data are collected at baseline plus five post-baseline monthly follow ups. Once the optimized Community Wise intervention is identified, it will be evaluated against an existing standard of care in a future randomized clinical trial. Discussion: This paper describes the protocol of the first ever study using CBPR and MOST to optimize a substance use intervention targeting a marginalized population. Data from this study will culminate in an optimized Community Wise manual; enhanced methodological strategies to develop multi-component scalable interventions using MOST and CBPR; and a better understanding of the application of critical consciousness theory to the field of health inequalities related to AIDU. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02951455 . Registered on 1 November 2016.
Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework to optimize an intervention to increase COVID-19 testing for Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers: A study protocol

Marya Gwadz,Charles M Cleland,Maria Lizardo,Robert L Hawkins,Greg Bangser,Lalitha Parameswaran,Victoria Stanhope,Jennifer A Robinson,Shristi Karim,Tierra Hollaway,Paola G Ramirez,Prema L Filippone,Amanda S Ritchie,Angela Banfield,Elizabeth Silverman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13576-0

IF: 4.5

2022-06-21

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: Among those at highest risk for COVID-19 exposure is the large population of frontline essential workers in occupations such food service, retail, personal care, and in-home health services, among whom Black and Latino/Hispanic persons are over-represented. For those not vaccinated and at risk for exposure to COVID-19, including frontline essential workers, regular (approximately weekly) COVID-19 testing is recommended. However, Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers in these occupations experience serious impediments to COVID-19 testing at individual/attitudinal- (e.g., lack of knowledge of guidelines), social- (e.g., social norms), and structural-levels of influence (e.g., poor access), and rates of testing for COVID-19 are insufficient. Methods/design: The proposed community-engaged study uses the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework and an efficient factorial design to test four candidate behavioral intervention components informed by an integrated conceptual model that combines critical race theory, harm reduction, and self-determination theory. They are A) motivational interview counseling, B) text messaging grounded in behavioral economics, C) peer education, and D) access to testing (via navigation to an appointment vs. a self-test kit). All participants receive health education on COVID-19. The specific aims are to: identify which components contribute meaningfully to improvement in the primary outcome, COVID-19 testing confirmed with documentary evidence, with the most effective combination of components comprising an "optimized" intervention that strategically balances effectiveness against affordability, scalability, and efficiency (Aim 1); identify mediators and moderators of the effects of components (Aim 2); and use a mixed-methods approach to explore relationships among COVID-19 testing and vaccination (Aim 3). Participants will be N = 448 Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers not tested for COVID-19 in the past six months and not fully vaccinated for COVID-19, randomly assigned to one of 16 intervention conditions, and assessed at 6- and 12-weeks post-baseline. Last, N = 50 participants will engage in qualitative in-depth interviews. Discussion: This optimization trial is designed to yield an effective, affordable, and efficient behavioral intervention that can be rapidly scaled in community settings. Further, it will advance the literature on intervention approaches for social inequities such as those evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05139927 ; Registered on 11/29/2021. Protocol version 1.0. May 2, 2022, Version 1.0.
Iowa Implementation for Sustainability Framework

Laura Cullen,Kirsten Hanrahan,Stephanie W. Edmonds,Heather Schacht Reisinger,Michele Wagner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01157-5

2022-01-04

Implementation Science

Abstract:Abstract Background An application-oriented implementation framework designed for clinicians and based on the Diffusion of Innovations theory included 81 implementation strategies with suggested timing for use within four implementation phases. The purpose of this research was to evaluate and strengthen the framework for clinician use and propose its usefulness in implementation research. Methods A multi-step, iterative approach guided framework revisions. Individuals requesting the use of the framework over the previous 7 years were sent an electronic questionnaire. Evaluation captured framework usability, generalizability, accuracy, and implementation phases for each strategy. Next, nurse leaders who use the framework pile sorted strategies for cultural domain analysis. Last, a panel of five EBP/implementation experts used these data and built consensus to strengthen the framework. Results Participants ( n = 127/1578; 8% response) were predominately nurses (94%), highly educated (94% Master’s or higher), and from across healthcare (52% hospital/system, 31% academia, and 7% community) in the USA (84%). Most (96%) reported at least some experience using the framework and 88% would use the framework again. A 4-point scale (1 = not/disagree to 4 = very/agree) was used. The framework was deemed useful (92%, rating 3–4), easy to use (72%), intuitive (67%), generalizable (100%), flexible and adaptive (100%), with accurate phases (96%), and accurate targets (100%). Participants ( n = 51) identified implementation strategy timing within four phases (Cochran’s Q ); 54 of 81 strategies (66.7%, p < 0.05) were significantly linked to a specific phase; of these, 30 (55.6%) matched the original framework. Next, nurse leaders ( n = 23) completed a pile sorting activity. Anthropac software was used to analyze the data and visualize it as a domain map and hierarchical clusters with 10 domains. Lastly, experts used these data and implementation science to refine and specify each of the 75 strategies, identifying phase, domain, actors, and function. Strategy usability, timing, and groupings were used to refine the framework. Conclusion The Iowa Implementation for Sustainability Framework offers a typology to guide implementation for evidence-based healthcare. This study specifies 75 implementation strategies within four phases and 10 domains and begins to validate the framework. Standard use of strategy names is foundational to compare and understand when implementation strategies are effective, in what dose, for which topics, by whom, and in what context.
Empirical Development of a Behavioral Intervention for African American/Black and Latino Persons with Unsuppressed HIV Viral Load Levels: An Application of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) Using Cost-Effectiveness as an Optimization Objective

Jonathan Feelemyer,R Scott Braithwaite,Qinlian Zhou,Charles M. Cleland,Prima Manandhar-Sasaki,Leo Wilton,Amanda Ritchie,Linda M. Collins,Marya V. Gwadz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04335-w

2024-04-27

AIDS and Behavior

Abstract:We used results from an optimization randomized controlled trial which tested five behavioral intervention components to support HIV antiretroviral adherence/HIV viral suppression, grounded in the multiphase optimization strategy and using a fractional factorial design to identify intervention components with cost-effectiveness sufficiently favorable for scalability. Results were incorporated into a validated HIV computer simulation to simulate longer-term effects of combinations of components on health and costs. We simulated the 32 corresponding long-term trajectories for viral load suppression, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and costs. The components were designed to be culturally and structurally salient. They were: motivational interviewing counseling sessions (MI), pre-adherence skill building (SB), peer mentorship (PM), focused support groups (SG), and patient navigation (short version [NS], long version [NL]. All participants also received health education on HIV treatment. We examined four scenarios: one-time intervention with and without discounting and continuous interventions with and without discounting. In all four scenarios, interventions that comprise or include SB and NL (and including health education) were cost effective (< $100,000/quality-adjusted life year). Further, with consideration of HRQoL impact, maximal intervention became cost-effective enough to be scalable. Thus, a fractional factorial experiment coupled with cost-effectiveness analysis is a promising approach to optimize multi-component interventions for scalability. The present study can guide service planning efforts for HIV care settings and health departments.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical
Applying the multiphase optimization strategy to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an online road safety education intervention for children and parents: a pilot study

Julia Pham,Adrian Buttazzoni,Jason Gilliland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19208-z

IF: 4.5

2024-07-04

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: Reports of children's engagement in active transportation outline low participation rates in many countries despite many associated mental, physical, and social health benefits. One of the main contributors to this phenomenon is a cited lack of education and knowledge among children regarding active travel (AT), specifically road safety. To address this issue, the aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an online road safety education intervention to promote AT among children and their parents. Methods: Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) for intervention development, implementation, and evaluation, we designed and assessed a four-module online road safety education intervention with a sample of 57 parent-child dyads using a 23 factorial design featuring both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Results: Main intervention feasibility findings include positive and critical feedback on the program's content and design, and moderate participant engagement as reflected by program retention and completion rates. With respect to the preliminary intervention effectiveness on children, a significant improvement in road safety knowledge scores was observed for groups that feature the "wheeling safety and skills" module. Slight improvements in AT knowledge scores across all the intervention groups were observed, but were not of significance. Preliminary intervention effectiveness on select parental AT practices and perceptions saw significant improvements in some groups. Groups that featured the 'wheeling safety and skills' module exhibited significantly higher guided choice scores upon completion of the program than those who did not receive this component. Conclusion: The MOST framework allowed us to design and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an online road safety education intervention. The developed intervention has demonstrated that it has the potential to improve children's road safety knowledge and some areas of parental AT practices and perceptions, to which improvements may be attributed to the inclusion of the "wheeling safety and skills" module, suggesting that the targeted focus on cycling skills is a prioritized area. AT programming and practice implications are discussed. Future research is encouraged to refine modules to better reflect the priorities of children and parents and to test these refined components among larger samples. Word count: 9,391 (excludes abstract, tables, figures, abbreviations, and references).
A Factorial Experiment to Optimize Remotely Delivered Behavioral Treatment for Obesity: Results of the Opt‐IN Study

Bonnie Spring,Angela F. Pfammatter,Sara H. Marchese,Tammy Stump,Christine Pellegrini,H. Gene McFadden,Donald Hedeker,Juned Siddique,Neil Jordan,Linda M. Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22915

IF: 9.298

2020-07-12

Obesity

Abstract:ObjectiveIntensive behavioral obesity treatments face scalability challenges, but evidence is lacking about which treatment components could be cut back without reducing weight loss. The Optimization of Remotely Delivered Intensive Lifestyle Treatment for Obesity (Opt‐IN) study applied the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to develop an entirely remotely delivered, technology‐supported weight‐loss package to maximize the amount of weight loss attainable for ≤$500.MethodsSix‐month weight loss was examined among adults (N = 562) with BMI ≥ 25 who were randomly assigned to conditions in a factorial experiment crossing five dichotomous treatment components set to either low/high (12 vs. 24 coaching calls) or off/on (primary care provider reports, text messaging, meal replacements, and buddy training).ResultsAbout 84.3% of participants completed the final assessment. The treatment package yielding maximum weight loss for ≤$500 included 12 coaching calls, buddy training, and primary care provider progress reports; produced average weight loss of 6.1 kg, with 57.1% losing ≥5% and 51.8% losing ≥7%; and cost $427 per person. The most expensive candidate‐treatment component (24 vs. 12 coaching calls) was screened out of the optimized treatment package because it did not increase weight loss.ConclusionsSystematically testing each treatment component's effect on weight loss made it possible to eliminate more expensive but less impactful components, yielding an optimized, resource‐efficient obesity treatment for evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.

endocrinology & metabolism,nutrition & dietetics
Optimising a digitally delivered behavioural weight loss programme: study protocol for a factorial cluster randomised controlled trial

Gina M. Wren,Dimitrios A. Koutoukidis,Jadine Scragg,Grace Preston,Marianne Hennessy,Daisy Estephane,Michael Whitman,Susan A. Jebb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08320-5

IF: 2.728

2024-07-15

Trials

Abstract:Digitally delivered weight loss programmes can provide a convenient, potentially cheaper, and scalable treatment option for people who may need to lose weight. However, outcomes are often inferior to in-person interventions in the long-term. This trial will use principles from the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST) framework to test whether it can enhance the effectiveness of a commercial digital behavioural weight loss programme. This trial aims to identify an optimised combination of four intervention components to enhance weight loss over a 24-week period. We will also explore which components contribute to improvements in participant retention and engagement with the programme.

medicine, research & experimental
Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies

Maria E. Fernandez,Gill A. ten Hoor,Sanne van Lieshout,Serena A. Rodriguez,Rinad S. Beidas,Guy Parcel,Robert A. C. Ruiter,Christine M. Markham,Gerjo Kok

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158

IF: 5.2

2019-06-18

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background: The ultimate impact of a health innovation depends not only on its effectiveness but also on its reach in the population and the extent to which it is implemented with high levels of completeness and fidelity. Implementation science has emerged as the potential solution to the failure to translate evidence from research into effective practice and policy evident in many fields. Implementation scientists have developed many frameworks, theories and models, which describe implementation determinants, processes, or outcomes; yet, there is little guidance about how these can inform the development or selection of implementation strategies (methods or techniques used to improve adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of interventions) (<a href="#B1">1</a>, <a href="#B2">2</a>). To move the implementation science field forward and to provide a practical tool to apply the knowledge in this field, we describe a systematic process for planning or selecting implementation strategies: Implementation Mapping.Methods: Implementation Mapping is based on Intervention Mapping (a six-step protocol that guides the design of multi-level health promotion interventions and implementation strategies) and expands on Intervention Mapping step 5. It includes insights from both the implementation science field and Intervention Mapping. Implementation Mapping involves five tasks: (1) conduct an implementation needs assessment and identify program adopters and implementers; (2) state adoption and implementation outcomes and performance objectives, identify determinants, and create matrices of change objectives; (3) choose theoretical methods (mechanisms of change) and select or design implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. The tasks are iterative with the planner circling back to previous steps throughout this process to ensure all adopters and implementers, outcomes, determinants, and objectives are addressed.Discussion: Implementation Mapping provides a systematic process for developing strategies to improve the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings.

public, environmental & occupational health

A quantitative in situ hybridization protocol for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival post-mortem human brain tissue.

Optimization Methods and Implementation Science: An Opportunity for Behavioral and Biobehavioral Interventions

Moving beyond the treatment package approach to developing behavioral interventions: addressing questions that arose during an application of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST)

The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) in Child Maltreatment Prevention Research

A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions

The Multiphase Optimization Strategy for Engineering Effective Tobacco Use Interventions

Evaluating individual intervention components: making decisions based on the results of a factorial screening experiment

Intervention Optimization: A Paradigm Shift and Its Potential Implications for Clinical Psychology

Optimizing Interventions for Equitability: Some Initial Ideas

Multiphase optimization of a multicomponent intervention for informal dementia caregivers: a study protocol

Classifying Intervention Components Used in Sleep Duration Interventions for Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Decision-making in the multiphase optimization strategy: Applying decision analysis for intervention value efficiency to optimize an information leaflet to promote key antecedents of medication adherence

Using Multiphase Optimization Strategy and Human-Centered Design to Create an Integrated Model of Palliative Care Skills in Home-Based Physical Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure

Optimizing a community-engaged multi-level group intervention to reduce substance use: an application of the multiphase optimization strategy

Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework to optimize an intervention to increase COVID-19 testing for Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers: A study protocol

Iowa Implementation for Sustainability Framework

Empirical Development of a Behavioral Intervention for African American/Black and Latino Persons with Unsuppressed HIV Viral Load Levels: An Application of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) Using Cost-Effectiveness as an Optimization Objective

Applying the multiphase optimization strategy to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an online road safety education intervention for children and parents: a pilot study

A Factorial Experiment to Optimize Remotely Delivered Behavioral Treatment for Obesity: Results of the Opt‐IN Study

Optimising a digitally delivered behavioural weight loss programme: study protocol for a factorial cluster randomised controlled trial

Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies