Strategies to determine positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T lymphocyte response during the evolution of an epidemic

Isabelle Nel,Ajeeva Ithayakumar,Noémie Blumenthal,Charlotte Duneton,Valérie Guérin-El Khourouj,Jérôme Viala,Catherine Dollfus,Véronique Baudouin,Sophie Guilmin-Crepon,Ioannis Theodorou,Guislaine Carcelain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2024.113712

Abstract:During SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the assessment of immune protection of people at risk of severe infection was an important goal. The appearance of VOCs (Variant of Concern) highlighted the limits of evaluating immune protection through the humoral response. While the humoral response partly loses its neutralizing activity, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T cell response strongly cross protects against VOCs becoming an indispensable tool to assess immune protection. We compared two techniques available in laboratory to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T cell response in a cohort of infected or vaccinated patients with different levels of risk to develop a severe disease: the ELISpot assay and the T-Cell Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay respectively exploring IFNγ production and cell proliferation. We showed that the ELISpot assay detected more anti-Spike memory T cell response than the Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay. We next observed that the use of two different suppliers as antigenic source in the ELISpot assay did not affect the detection of anti-Spike memory T cell response. Finally, we explored a new approach for defining the positivity threshold, using unsupervised mixed Gaussian modeling, challenging the traditional ROC curve used by the supplier. That will be helpful in endemic situation where it could be difficult to recruit "negative" patients.