Abstract:Background: Advances in neural networks, deep learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) have progressed recently. Previous deep learning AI has been structured around domain-specific areas that are trained on dataset-specific areas of interest that yield high accuracy and precision. A new AI model using large language models (LLM) and nonspecific domain areas, ChatGPT (OpenAI), has gained attention. Although AI has demonstrated proficiency in managing vast amounts of data, implementation of that knowledge remains a challenge. Questions/purposes: (1) What percentage of Orthopaedic In-Training Examination questions can a generative, pretrained transformer chatbot (ChatGPT) answer correctly? (2) How does that percentage compare with results achieved by orthopaedic residents of different levels, and if scoring lower than the 10th percentile relative to 5th-year residents is likely to correspond to a failing American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery score, is this LLM likely to pass the orthopaedic surgery written boards? (3) Does increasing question taxonomy affect the LLM's ability to select the correct answer choices? Methods: This study randomly selected 400 of 3840 publicly available questions based on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and compared the mean score with that of residents who took the test over a 5-year period. Questions with figures, diagrams, or charts were excluded, including five questions the LLM could not provide an answer for, resulting in 207 questions administered with raw score recorded. The LLM's answer results were compared with the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination ranking of orthopaedic surgery residents. Based on the findings of an earlier study, a pass-fail cutoff was set at the 10th percentile. Questions answered were then categorized based on the Buckwalter taxonomy of recall, which deals with increasingly complex levels of interpretation and application of knowledge; comparison was made of the LLM's performance across taxonomic levels and was analyzed using a chi-square test. Results: ChatGPT selected the correct answer 47% (97 of 207) of the time, and 53% (110 of 207) of the time it answered incorrectly. Based on prior Orthopaedic In-Training Examination testing, the LLM scored in the 40th percentile for postgraduate year (PGY) 1s, the eighth percentile for PGY2s, and the first percentile for PGY3s, PGY4s, and PGY5s; based on the latter finding (and using a predefined cutoff of the 10th percentile of PGY5s as the threshold for a passing score), it seems unlikely that the LLM would pass the written board examination. The LLM's performance decreased as question taxonomy level increased (it answered 54% [54 of 101] of Tax 1 questions correctly, 51% [18 of 35] of Tax 2 questions correctly, and 34% [24 of 71] of Tax 3 questions correctly; p = 0.034). Conclusion: Although this general-domain LLM has a low likelihood of passing the orthopaedic surgery board examination, testing performance and knowledge are comparable to that of a first-year orthopaedic surgery resident. The LLM's ability to provide accurate answers declines with increasing question taxonomy and complexity, indicating a deficiency in implementing knowledge. Clinical relevance: Current AI appears to perform better at knowledge and interpretation-based inquires, and based on this study and other areas of opportunity, it may become an additional tool for orthopaedic learning and education.

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence to Resident Performance on Upper-Extremity Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Questions

Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Performance of ChatGPT on Text and Image Questions on a Complete AAOS Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE)

Evaluating ChatGPT Performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination

ChatGPT Performs at the Level of a Third-Year Orthopaedic Surgery Resident on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination

Inadequate Performance of ChatGPT on Orthopedic Board-Style Written Exams

Generative Artificial Intelligence Performs at a Second-Year Orthopedic Resident Level

ChatGPT Earns American Board Certification in Hand Surgery

Performance of Two Artificial Intelligence Generative Language Models on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination

Can generative artificial intelligence pass the orthopaedic board examination?

Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Performance on the Otolaryngology Residency In-Service Exam

Comparing performances of french orthopaedic surgery residents with the artificial intelligence ChatGPT-4/4o in the French diploma exams of orthopaedic and trauma surgery

ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing Chat are large language processing models that answered OITE questions with a similar accuracy to first-year orthopaedic surgery residents

Can Artificial Intelligence Pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Examination? Orthopaedic Residents Versus ChatGPT

Assessing the Efficacy of an AI-Powered Chatbot (ChatGPT) in Providing Information on Orthopedic Surgeries: A Comparative Study With Expert Opinion

Performance of artificial intelligence on a simulated Canadian urology board exam

An Exploratory Analysis of ChatGPT Compared to Human Performance With the Anesthesiology Oral Board Examination: Initial Insights and Implications

Assessing ChatGPT's orthopedic in-service training exam performance and applicability in the field

Is ChatGPT smarter than Otolaryngology trainees? A comparison study of board style exam questions

Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: can Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) pass Section 1 of the Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (Trauma & Orthopaedics) examination?

Is ChatGPT 3.5 smarter than Otolaryngology trainees? A comparison study of board style exam questions

Performance of Chatgpt in ophthalmology exam; human versus AI