Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial

Guo-Ying Liu,Yan-Fang Ye,Yao-Fei Jiang,Gina Jinna Chen,Wei-Xiong Xia,Yi-Sheng Huang,Tian-Sheng Gao,Yi-Min Liu,Ya-Ting Hou,Jian-Fei Li,Jia-Hao Liu,Nian Lu,Chang-Long Chen,Liang-Ru Ke,Hu Liang,Wei-Xin Bei,Wang-Zhong Li,Shu-Hui Dong,Qin Liu,Changqing Xie,He-Rui Yao,Yan-Qun Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077890
2024-06-19
BMJ
Abstract:Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial. Setting: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022. Participants: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Interventions: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1). Main outcome measures: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. Results: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up. Conclusion: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?