A Novel Scoring System for MYB RNA In Situ Hybridization Displays High Sensitivity and Specificity for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Clinical Setting

Mariel Bedell,Dale W Lewis,Raja R Seethala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01656-z
2024-06-19
Abstract:Background: MYB RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has emerged as a reliable and accessible marker to support adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) diagnosis, though still not well studied. Here, we report our results in a validation and prospective cohort to improve MYB RNA ISH diagnostic accuracy. Methods: 79 cases (23 retrospective and 56 prospective) underwent MYB RNA ISH testing (44 ACC and 35 non-ACC). MYB RNA ISH results were initially interpreted based on previously established (original) scoring criteria. Weighted "i-scores", percent positive tumor cells, percent tumor cells with large signals (% LS), and staining pattern (abluminal, diffuse, focal non-patterned, or negative) were inputs for logistic regression models. Final model performance characteristics were compared with original scoring criteria and MYB::NFIB FISH results. Results: An abluminal pattern was characteristic and exclusive to ACC. All i-scores, % LS, and percent positive were significantly higher in ACC. Original scoring criteria yielded a 95.5% sensitivity (Sn), 68.6% specificity (Sp), and 83.5% accuracy. MYB::NFIB FISH yielded a 42.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 60% accuracy. Optimizing for performance, simplicity, and minimal collinearity, our final model was defined as: abluminal pattern and/or % LS > 16.5%, which resulted in a 93.2% Sn, 97.1% Sp, and 94.9% accuracy for ACC diagnosis. False negatives included an ACC with striking tubular eosinophilia and a MYBL1::NFIB translocated ACC. One false positive exclusive to the final model was a nasopharyngeal carcinoma with MYB amplification. Conclusions: MYB RNA ISH has a higher Sn than MYB::NFIB FISH while retaining high Sp. Our model provides improvements to specificity compared to original scoring criteria and highlight the importance of abluminal staining pattern and % LS. Nonetheless, alternate fusions remain key false negatives while rare non-ACC with other mechanisms of MYB activation may present as false positives.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?