Abstract:PRO: Nearly all new devices and drugs come from industry that provides two-thirds of the funding for medical research, and a much higher fraction of clinical research. Realistically, without corporate-funded studies, perioperative research would stagnate with little innovation and few new products. Opinions are ubiquitous and normal but do not constitute epidemiologic bias. Competent clinical research includes many protections against selection and measurement bias, and the publication process provides at least moderate protection against misinterpretation of results. Trial registries largely prevent selective data presentation. Sponsored trials are particularly protected against inappropriate corporate influence because they are usually codesigned with the US Food and Drug Administration, and analyses are based on formal predefined statistical plans, as well as being conducted with rigorous external monitoring. Novel products, which are essential for advances in clinical care, largely come from industry, and industry appropriately funds much of the required research. We should celebrate industry's contribution to improvements in clinical care. CON: While industry funding contributes to research and discovery, examples of industry-funded research demonstrate bias. In the setting of financial pressures and potential conflict of interest, bias can influence the type of study design, hypotheses being tested, rigor and transparency in data analysis, interpretation, as well as reporting of the results. Unlike public granting agencies, industry does not necessarily provide funding based on unbiased peer review following an open call for proposals. The focus on success can influence the choice of a comparator, which might not be ideal among the possible alternatives, the language used in the publication, and even the ability to publish. Unpublished negative trials can result in selected information being withheld from the scientific community and the public. Appropriate safeguards are needed to ensure that research addresses the most important and relevant questions, that results are available even when they do not support the use of a product produced by the funding company, that populations studied reflect the relevant patients, that the most rigorous approaches are applied, that studies have the appropriate power to address the question posed, and that conclusions are presented in an unbiased manner.

Ethical issues of medical schools and their academic departments accepting gifts from pharma

Giving and receiving of gifts between pharmaceutical companies and medical specialists in Australia

[The relationship between medicine and medical suppliers]

Medical students' attitudes toward interactions with the pharmaceutical industry: a national survey in Japan

The Cost of Influence: How Gifts to Physicians Shape Prescriptions and Drug Costs

Conflicts of Interest of Canadian Medical School Deans: A Cross-Sectional Study

Beliefs and practices of physicians in Lebanon regarding promotional gifts and interactions with pharmaceutical companies

Closed Financial Loops: When They Happen in Government, They're Called Corruption; in Medicine, They're Just a Footnote

Health professional’s exposure, attitude, and acceptance of drug promotion by industry representatives: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopia

Quid pro quo in online medical consultation? Investigating the effects of small monetary gifts from patients

Ethical principles for physician rating sites

Ethical Issues in Outsourcing: The Case of Contract Medical Research and the Global Pharmaceutical Industry

Pro-Con Debate: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Industry-Sponsored Research

Medical communication companies and industry grants

Industry-Funded Continuing Medical Education: The Potential for Bias.

Ethics on academic procurement of cadavers

The Case for Advocacy Curricula and Opportunities in Medical Education: Past Examples to Inform Future Instruction

SAGES perspective: professional medical associations, commercial interests, and conflicts of interest

Ethical issues and proposed solutions in conducting practical assessment of medical students involving patients

Does Medical School Training Relate to Practice? Evidence from Big Data

Ethical Philanthropy in the era of Patient-Centric, Value-Based Health Care