GENETIC CLONAL RECOGNITION ABILITIES IN MARINE INVERTEBRATES MUST BE MAINTAINED BY SELECTION FOR SOMETHING ELSE
R. Crozier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00578.x
1986-09-01
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
Abstract:Various marine invertebrates form colonies or groups of genetically identical individuals. In many instances these animals show a very strong ability to distinguish between members of their own colony and those of other colonies, or at least between members of their own and of other clones (Ayre, 1982; Lubbock, 1980; Neigel and Avise, 1983a, 1983b, 1985). In anemones, individuals tolerate clonemates as neighbors, but attack members of other clones with which they come into contact (although habituation to repeatedly encountered foreigners occurs [Sebens, 1984; Stoddart et al., 1985]). From the pattern of "mistakes," in which animals accept members of other clones, it is plausible to attribute this "clonal recognition" to the matching of genotypes at a single locus. The parallels between this system and the immune system of mammals are both obvious and previously noted (e.g., Lubbock, 1980), and are echoed by findings that the mouse immune system is itself associated with individual recognition (Boyse et al., 1983). Two genetic models have been proposed for this recognition mechanism. Under the genetic-identity model, individuals would accept each other only if their genotypes at the recognition locus are identical (Lubbock, 1980; Neigel and Avise, 1983a). For example, if there are alleles A and B at this locus, AA individuals would only accept other AA individuals, and would reject AB and BB individuals. Under the allele-sharing model, individuals accept others if they share at least one allele in common (Scofield et al., 1982), so that AA individuals accept both AA and AB individuals, but reject BB ones. It is worthwhile inquiring into the dynamics of these models, under the assumption that an animal imposes a cost on members of other clones that it encounters. This cost is certainly imposed in the case of the sea anemones studied, which possess special stinging organs (acrorhagi) used only against non-clonemates during fights. I will show below that polymorphism for the cues involved in recognition according to the above schemes is not maintainable if the only selection involved is that imposed by the recognition system itself.