Laboratory diagnosis of rabies in Bangkok and the central part of Thailand, 2001-2004.

V. Tepsumethanon,V. Sitprija
2005-02-01
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet
Abstract:The Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute (QSMI) is the main center for rabies laboratory diagnosis and handles approximately 40% of total tissue specimens in Thailand. The fluorescent antibody (FAT) and mouse inoculation (MIT) tests are methods used for this purpose. The number of specimens tested has declined from over 4,471 in 1985 to 1,000 each year. The decline is thought to be due in part to the fact that other provinces now have readily accessible diagnostic laboratories as well. QSMI is located in Bangkok and specimens tested are now mostly from the city and surrounding regions. They are 75% from within Bangkok, 18% from immediately surrounding provinces, 6% from the central part of Thailand (except Bangkok and surrounding provinces), 1% from the East and North East, and 0.1% from Southern provinces. From 2001 to 2004, submitted specimens came from dogs 75%, cats 20% and other mammals 5% (gibbons, monkeys, rodents, rabbits, squirrels and humans). The overall FAT positive rate in dogs significantly declined from 40 in 2001 to 25 in 2004 (p < 0.001) (Table 1). It had been 60% in 1985. There was no similar significant decline in the FAT positive rate among cats and other mammals (Table 1). Changes in the FAT positivity rates, when comparing the ages of animals, showed a statistically significant decline in all except those below 3 months of age (Table 2). The authors found a relatively large number of animals that were diagnosed rabid had a reliable history of at least one rabies vaccination (Table 3). This confirmed previous observation that showed that one shot vaccination will not provide reliable long
What problem does this paper attempt to address?