[Endocrine side effects of tumor treatment]

Johanna Braegelmann,Dagmar Führer,Susanne Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-024-01731-1
Abstract:Targeted and immune-based treatments represent significant innovations in oncology and impressively improve the prognosis of many tumor diseases. Their now widespread use as a standard treatment for several malignant diseases increasingly requires knowledge of how to deal with new adverse events (AE) induced by oncological agents in centers and routine practice [12, 13]. For example, the blockade of specific checkpoints of the inhibitory immune system by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) causes the loss of immune tolerance to the body's own tissue with the occurrence of endocrine immune-related AE (irAE) in approximately 10% of patients treated with ICI [3, 11]. Targeted treatments, such as with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and phosphoinositide 3‑kinase (PI3K) inhibitors often lead to disorders of glucose metabolism and thyroid gland dysfunction. The challenges of maintaining bone health during endocrine therapy in patients with prostate and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and in the endocrine follow-up care of childhood cancer survivors are well-known and are becoming increasingly more important for the long-term prognosis and quality of life [5, 20]. However, although the recommendations for a systematic management of endocrine side effects of these relatively new tumor therapies can be found in guidelines, they are not yet established in routine clinical care [15, 19]. A close interdisciplinary cooperation is required for optimal care of people with cancer [7]. The development of such interdisciplinary cross-sectoral treatment structures is important as tumor treatment is primarily carried out by hematologists or oncologists, while the management of AE induced by oncological agents increasingly involves primary care physicians including internists and in the case of endocrine AE requires the specific expertise of endocrinologists and diabetologists.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?