Development of a short form of the Japanese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA‐J‐10) among informal caregivers of older adults
Taiji Noguchi,Takeshi Nakagawa,Xueying Jin,Ayane Komatsu,Shintaro Togashi,Mitsunori Miyashita,Tami Saito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14824
2024-02-12
Geriatrics and Gerontology International
Abstract:This study developed a 10‐item short version of the Japanese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA‐J‐10), a multidimensional assessment measure of caregiving experience. This brief caregiver assessment tool, which includes negative and positive aspects of caregiving, enables the effective evaluation of caregivers, thereby promoting caregiver support. Aim To support informal caregivers, a simple assessment tool capturing the multidimensional nature of caregiving experiences, including negative and positive aspects, is required. We developed a short form of the Japanese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA‐J), a multidimensional assessment scale for caregiver experiences. Methods The internet survey involved 934 Japanese informal caregivers aged 20–79 years (mean age = 58.8 years; 50.2% women) who completed questionnaires, including the CRA‐J 18 items (CRA‐J‐18), consisting of five domains, such as impacts on schedule and finances and positive experiences of caregiving. A 10‐item short version of the CRA‐J (CRA‐J‐10; 0–50 points), which was prepared by selecting the two items with the highest factor loadings from each domain, was tested for model fit by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and was analyzed for correlations with the CRA‐J‐18, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale (PACS), Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9), and WHO‐Five Well‐Being Index (WHO‐5). The area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic was evaluated as discriminability for depressive symptoms (PHQ‐9 ≥ 10 points). Results The CFA indicated a good model fit in the CRA‐J‐10. The CRA‐J‐10 correlated well with the CRA‐J‐18 and other variables (CRA‐J‐18, r = 0.970; ZBI, r = 0.747; PACS, r = −0.467; PHQ‐9, r = 0.582; WHO‐5, r = −0.588) and showed good discriminant performance for the presence of depressive symptoms (AUC = 0.793, 95% confidence interval = 0.762–0.823). Conclusions The CRA‐J‐10 allows a simple assessment of caregiver experiences, helping support informal caregivers. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••–••.
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology