Dual-task gait has prognostic value for cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease

Jemma Kim,John V Rider,Anne Zinselmeier,Yi-Fang Chiu,Daniel Peterson,Jason K Longhurst
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.06.006
Abstract:Introduction: Cognitive decline frequently occurs in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), but the clinical methods to predict the onset of cognitive changes are limited. Given preliminary evidence of the link between gait and cognition, the purpose of this study was to determine if dual task (DT) gait was related to declines in cognition over two years in PD. Methods: A retrospective two-year longitudinal study of 48 individuals with PD using data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative of the Michael J. Fox Foundation. The following data were extracted at baseline: spatiotemporal gait (during single and DT), demographics (age, sex), PD disease duration (time since diagnosis), motor function (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)), and cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)), with MoCA scores also extracted after two years. Results: A binomial logistic regression was conducted, with all covariates (above) in block 1 and DT effect (DTE) of gait characteristics in block 2 entered in a stepwise fashion. The final model was statistically significant (χ2(6) = 23.20, p < 0.001) and correctly classified 78.7 % of participants by cognitive status after two years. Only DTE of arm swing asymmetry (ASA) (p = 0.030) was included in block 2 such that a 1 % decline in DTE resulted in 1.6 % increased odds of cognitive decline. Conclusions: Individuals with greater change in arm swing asymmetry from single to DT gait may be more likely to experience a decline in cognition within two years. These results suggested that reduced automaticity or poor utilization of attentional resources may be indicative of subtle changes in cognition and indicate that DT paradigms may hold promise as a marker of future cognitive decline.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?