Abstract:There are marked racial and ethnic disparities in diagnosis and services for individuals on the autism spectrum, yet race and ethnicity are underreported and underexamined in autism research. The current study examines the reporting of race and ethnicity and the inclusion of participants across racial and ethnic groups in studies included in a large-scale systematic review of autism intervention research (1990–2017). Trained research assistants reviewed 1013 articles and extracted data on the reporting of race and ethnicity data and the inclusion of participants from different racial and ethnic categories from each article. Only 25% of the articles reported any data on race and ethnicity and reporting over time has slowly increased across the 28 years of the review. Descriptive statistics suggest that race and ethnicity reporting varied by study design, intervention, and outcomes. In studies with reported data, White participants had the highest rate of participation (64.8%), with a large gap between the next highest rates of participation, which were among Hispanic/Latino (9.4%), Black (7.7%), and Asian (6.4%) participants. The lack of reporting and the limited inclusion of participants across minoritized racial and ethnic groups are concerning and suggest a need to examine practices in autism research from planning to dissemination. Lay Abstract Researchers who study autism-related interventions do a poor job reporting data related to the race and ethnicity of autistic individuals who participate in their studies, and of those who do report these data, the participants are overwhelmingly White. This is problematic for many reasons, as we know little about how interventions are meeting the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse populations, and we assume that interventions are effective for all when they have been developed and validated primarily with and for White children. This study examined the reporting patterns of autism intervention researchers whose work was included in a large-scale systematic review of the intervention literature published between 1990 and 2017. We found that only 25% of studies (out of 1,013 included in the review) included data related to the race and ethnicity of their participants, with minimal change in reporting patterns across the years. In studies with reported data, White participants had the highest rate of participation, with a large gap between the next highest rates of participation among Hispanic/Latino, Black, and Asian participants. Other race and ethnicity groups had very low representation. This study includes additional analyses which examine how the reporting patterns and the inclusion of racially and ethnically diverse participants varies across study types, interventions, and outcome areas. Reporting this data is merely a starting point to begin to address the many disparities in autism-related healthcare, education, and research practices, and this article includes broader implications and next steps to ensure the field becomes more equitable and inclusive.

Consideration of Demographic Variables in Behavioral Interventions Pertaining to Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review

Use of Socioeconomic Demographic Data in Studies on Pediatric Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review

Applied Research in Clinical Audiology with Spanish Speakers in the United States: A Scoping Review

Prevalence and Characteristics of Developmental Disabilities Among Children Who Receive Hearing Health Care

Understanding pediatric inpatient conductive hearing loss: An analysis of patient demographics

Patient characteristics of pediatric inpatients with sensorineural hearing loss: Insights from the 2016 KID database

Rethinking the Accessibility of Hearing Assessments for Children with Developmental Disabilities

Participant Characteristics in Research on Interventions for Young Children With Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review

Patterns in reporting and participant inclusion related to race and ethnicity in autism intervention literature: Data from a large-scale systematic review of evidence-based practices

Interventions aimed at improving healthcare and health education equity for adult d/Deaf patients: a systematic review

Age-based disparities in hearing loss diagnosis and treatment in the United States population

Improving Pediatric Hearing Testing for Children with Developmental Delays: The Effects of Video Modeling on Child Compliance and Caregiver Stress

Hearing rehabilitation of adults with auditory processing disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence-based interventions

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Approaches Proposed to Children With Severe-to-Profound Prelinguistic Deafness on the Development of Auditory, Speech, and Language Skills: A Systematic Review.

Hearing Loss Interventions for Occupational Therapy Practitioners: A Scoping Review

Association Between Social Determinants of Health and Hearing Loss and Hearing Intervention in Older US Adults

Factors influencing rehabilitation and education in children who have cochlear implants: An integrative review

A Study of Certain Selected Variables (Family Environment and Social Adjustment) Related to Hearing Impaired Children

Impact of Hearing Loss on Social Participation in Children: A Scoping Review

Health education interventions for individuals with hearing impairment: A systematic review

Audiologist Practices: Parent Hearing Aid Education and Support