Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Philip A Philip,Ibrahim Azar,Joanne Xiu,Michael J Hall,Andrew Eugene Hendifar,Emil Lou,Jimmy J Hwang,Jun Gong,Rebecca Feldman,Michelle Ellis,Phil Stafford,David Spetzler,Moh'd M Khushman,Davendra Sohal,A Craig Lockhart,Benjamin A Weinberg,Wafik S El-Deiry,John Marshall,Anthony F Shields,W Michael Korn,Philip A. Philip,Michael J. Hall,Jimmy J. Hwang,Moh'd M. Khushman,A. Craig Lockhart,Benjamin A. Weinberg,Wafik S. El-Deiry,Anthony F. Shields,W. Michael Korn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3581
IF: 13.801
2022-04-21
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Abstract Purpose: KRAS mutation (MT) is a major oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A small subset of PDACs harbor KRAS wild-type (WT). We aim to characterize the molecular profiles of KRAS WT PDAC to uncover new pathogenic drivers and offer targeted treatments. Experimental Design: Tumor tissue obtained from surgical or biopsy material was subjected to next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing, microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair status determination. Results: Of the 2,483 patients (male 53.7%, median age 66 years) studied, 266 tumors (10.7%) were KRAS WT. The most frequently mutated gene in KRAS WT PDAC was TP53 (44.5%), followed by BRAF (13.0%). Multiple mutations within the DNA-damage repair (BRCA2, ATM, BAP1, RAD50, FANCE, PALB2), chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, ARID2, KMT2D, KMT2C, SMARCA4, SETD2), and cell-cycle control pathways (CDKN2A, CCND1, CCNE1) were detected frequently. There was no statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression between KRAS WT (15.8%) and MT (17%) tumors. However, KRAS WT PDAC were more likely to be MSI-high (4.7% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.05), tumor mutational burden–high (4.5% vs. 1%; P < 0.05), and exhibit increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid dendritic cells. KRAS WT PDACs exhibited gene fusions of BRAF (6.6%), FGFR2 (5.2%), ALK (2.6%), RET (1.3%), and NRG1 (1.3%), as well as amplification of FGF3 (3%), ERBB2 (2.2%), FGFR3 (1.8%), NTRK (1.8%), and MET (1.3%). Real-world evidence reveals a survival advantage of KRAS WT patients in overall cohorts as well as in patients treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or 5-FU/oxaliplatin. Conclusions: KRAS WT PDAC represents 10.7% of PDAC and is enriched with targetable alterations, including immuno-oncologic markers. Identification of KRAS WT patients in clinical practice may expand therapeutic options in a clinically meaningful manner.
oncology