Care integration within and outside health system boundaries

Sara J. Singer,Anna D. Sinaiko,Maike V. Tietschert,Michaela Kerrissey,Russell S. Phillips,Veronique Martin,Grace Joseph,Hassina Bahadurzada,Denis Agniel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13578
2020-12-01
Health Services Research
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>Examine care integration—efforts to unify disparate parts of health care organizations to generate synergy across activities occurring within and between them—to understand whether and at which organizational level health systems impact care quality and staff experience.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Sources</h3><p>Surveys administered to one practice manager (56/59) and up to 26 staff (828/1360) in 59 practice sites within 24 physician organizations within 17 health systems in four states (2017‐2019).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Design</h3><p>We developed manager and staff surveys to collect data on organizational, social, and clinical process integration, at four organizational levels: practice site, physician organization, health system, and outside health systems. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and regression.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Principal Findings</h3><p>Managers and staff perceived opportunity for improvement across most types of care integration and organizational levels. Managers/staff perceived little variation in care integration across health systems. They perceived better care integration within practice sites than within physician organizations, health systems, and outside health systems—up to 38 percentage points (pp) lower (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) outside health systems compared to within practice sites. Of nine clinical process integration measures, one standard deviation (SD) (7.2‐pp) increase in use of evidence‐based care related to 6.4‐pp and 8.9‐pp increases in perceived quality of care by practice sites and health systems, respectively, and a 4.5‐pp increase in staff job satisfaction; one SD (9.7‐pp) increase in integration of social services and community resources related to a 7.0‐pp increase in perceived quality of care by health systems; one SD (6.9‐pp) increase in patient engagement related to a 6.4‐pp increase in job satisfaction and a 4.6‐pp decrease in burnout; and one SD (10.6‐pp) increase in integration of diabetic eye examinations related to a 5.5‐pp increase in job satisfaction (all <i>P</i> &lt; .05). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Measures of clinical process integration related to higher staff ratings of quality and experience. Action is needed to improve care integration within and outside health systems.</p></section>
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?