[Measurements of intracellular potential on spontaneously active vascular smooth muscle (guinea pig portal vein)].

D. von Loh,K. Golenhofen

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Differential expression of the presynaptic protein SNAP‐25 in mammalian retina

S. Catsicas,M. Catsicas,K. Keyser,H. Karten,M. Wilson,R. Milner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490330102

IF: 4.433

1992-09-01

Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract:We have studied the expression of the nerve terminal protein synaptosomal associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25) in the retina of adult rat, mouse, and monkey, as well as in the developing mouse retina. To evaluate SNAP‐25 expression, its distribution was compared to those of the synaptic vesicle‐associated proteins synapsin I and synaptophysin. In situ hybridization in adult rat retinas suggested that SNAP‐25 mRNA is mainly expressed by ganglion, amacrine, and horizontal cells, but not by photoreceptors and bipolar cells. In all species, the SNAP‐25 polypeptide was most abundant in the inner part of the inner and outer plexiform layers and was also found in the ganglion cell axons. In adult retina, synapsin I and synaptophysin were also mainly localized in synaptic fields and processes but all three proteins showed a distinct pattern of distribution. Finally, in mouse retina, the three proteins were first detectable at embryonic day 16 and subsequently showed developmentally regulated changes in their cellular localization. These results suggest that SNAP‐25 is predominantly expressed in specific subtypes of conventional synapses, but not ribbon synapses, and that it may also be involved in the physiology of nonvesicular terminals of horizontal cells. Our study also suggests that combinatorial expression of different components of the presynaptic specialization may contribute to synaptic functional diversity. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Management with intraocular lenses

Cristina Schnider,Leonard Yuen,Radhika Rampat,Dagny Zhu,Sandeep Dhallu,Tanya Trinh,Bharat Gurnani,Ahmed Abdelmaksoud,Gurpreet Bhogal-Bhamra,James S Wolffsohn,Shehzad A Naroo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102253

Abstract:Cataract surgery including intraocular lens (IOL) insertion, has been refined extensively since the first such procedure by Sir Harold Ridley in 1949. The intentional creation of monovision with IOLs using monofocal IOL designs has been reported since 1984. The first reported implantation of multifocal IOLs was published in 1987. Since then, various refractive and or diffractive multifocal IOLs have been commercialised. Most are concentric, but segmented IOLs are also available. The most popular are trifocal designs (overlaying two diffractive patterns to achieve additional focal planes at intermediate and near distances) and extended depth of focus designs which leave the patient largely spectacle independent with the reduced risk of bothersome contrast reduction and glare. As well as mini-monovision, surgical strategies to minimise the impact of presbyopia with IOLs includes mixing and matching lenses between the eyes and using IOLs whose power can be adjusted post-implantation. Various IOL designs to mimic the accommodative process have been tried including hinge optics, dual optics, lateral shifts lenses with cubic-type surfaces, lens refilling and curvature changing approaches, but issues in maintaining the active mechanism with post-surgical fibrosis, without causing ocular inflammation, remain a challenge. With careful patient selection, satisfaction rates with IOLs to manage presbyopia are high and anatomical or physiological complications rates are no higher than with monofocal IOLs.
Vertex-disjoint copies of K4-

K. Kawarabayashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt.1229

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Abstract:
Delay- and topology-independent design for inducing amplitude death on networks with time-varying delay connections.

Yoshiki Sugitani,K. Konishi,N. Hara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.042928

2015-10-01

Abstract:We present a procedure to systematically design the connection parameters that will induce amplitude death in oscillator networks with time-varying delay connections. The parameters designed by the procedure are valid in oscillator networks with any network topology and with any connection delay. The validity of the design procedure is confirmed by numerical simulation. We also consider a partial time-varying delay connection, which has both time-invariant and time-varying delays. The effectiveness of the partial connection is shown theoretically and numerically.
Laser refractive correction of presbyopia

Sri Ganesh,Sushmitha Samak Sriganesh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3074_23

2024-09-01

Abstract:Presbyopia is an inevitable and progressive loss of the eye's ability to focus on nearby objects due to aging, which affects everyone regardless of their refractive error. Uncorrected presbyopia is a significant burden worldwide and affects the quality of life. Conservative options include spectacle correction, contact lenses, and pharmacologic agents. Spectacles are commonly used to correct vision, but have certain drawbacks such as peripheral blur and impaired depth perception. These limitations have been associated with an increased risk of accidental falls. Several surgical options are available to address these issues, including cornea-based, lens-based, or scleral procedures. These procedures involve modifying the cornea's optics, replacing the crystalline lens, or attempting to restore accommodation. Each of the options has its benefits and limitations. One of the most common surgical methods of presbyopic correction that has recently become popular is presbyopic Laser assisted In situ keratomileusis (LASIK) due to its improved safety and efficacy. This article is a review of all the currently available data and studies regarding the various methods of correction of presbyopia, with an emphasis on the principles and outcomes of the corneal laser refractive procedures for presbyopia correction, such as PresbyLASIK, Supracor, PRESBYOND laser blended vision, and Custom Q.
Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays and New Developments

Majid Moshirfar,Marshall K Henrie,Carter J Payne,Briana K Ply,Yasmyne C Ronquillo,Steven H Linn,Phillip C Hoopes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S375577

2022-08-24

Abstract:Presbyopia may represent the largest segment of refractive errors that is without an established and effective refractive surgery treatment. Corneal Inlays are materials (synthetic or allogenic) implanted in the stroma of patients' corneas to improve presbyopia. These inlays, introduced into the United States in 2015 via the small-aperture corneal inlay (KAMRATM, SightLife Surgical/CorneaGen, Seattle, Washington, United States), were met with an initial wave of enthusiasm. Subsequent models like the shape-changing corneal inlay (RAINDROPTM, Revision Optics, Lake Forest, California, United States) offered excellent results for patients, but longer-term research raised questions about patient safety. At the time of this article, no synthetic corneal inlays are available in the United States for the correction of presbyopia. Other options for presbyopia correction include allograft corneal inlays, trifocal synthetic corneal inlays, pharmacologic therapies, scleral incisions or additive techniques and PresbyLASIK. Presently, allograft inlays consist of corneal lenticules removed from patients undergoing Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). We will review corneal inlays and other alternative procedures that may provide effective and predictable treatments for patients with presbyopia.
PresbyLASIK: A review of PresbyMAX, Supracor, and laser blended vision: Principles, planning, and outcomes

Rohit Shetty,Sheetal Brar,Mohita Sharma,Zelda Dadachanji,Vaitheeswaran Ganesan Lalgudi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_32_20

Abstract:PresbyLASIK is one of the most commonly used modalities of surgical correction in presbyopes with no cataract. Unlike monovision procedures, both the eyes are adjusted for near and distance, providing a good stereopsis. This works by creating a corneal multifocality and increasing the depth of focus. Most techniques of presbyLASIK currently employ hybrid methods, i.e., a component of monovision added on to a multifocal corneal ablation. Choosing an appropriate proportion of these two components according to the patients' requirements and meticulous patient selection are key to obtaining desirable outcomes. Being corneal-based procedures, presbyLASIK has shown to be reversible. Thorough updated knowledge of the different presbyLASIK procedures, their principles and outcomes based on previous studies is required before a refractive surgeon plans to start providing presbyLASIK services. We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed with the keywords "Presbyopia surgery," "PresbyLASIK" "PresbyMAX," "Supracor," and "Custom-Q." In this review article, we have explained the principles of the various presbyLASIK procedures, appropriate patient selection and planning on the devices with examples, and summarized the previously published outcomes of these techniques.
BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Mechanism and optics

Leon N. Davies,Sayantan Biswas,Mark Bullimore,Fiona Cruickshank,Jose J. Estevez,Safal Khanal,Pete Kollbaum,Remy Marcotte-Collard,Giancarlo Montani,Sotiris Plainis,Kathryn Richdale,Patrick Simard,James S. Wolffsohn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102185

IF: 3.946

2024-05-26

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Abstract:With over a billion adults worldwide currently affected, presbyopia remains a ubiquitous, global problem. Despite over a century of study, the precise mechanism of ocular accommodation and presbyopia progression remains a topic of debate. Accordingly, this narrative review outlines the lenticular and extralenticular components of accommodation together with the impact of age on the accommodative apparatus, neural control of accommodation, models of accommodation, the impact of presbyopia on retinal image quality, and both historic and contemporary theories of presbyopia.

ophthalmology
One-year experience in presbyopia correction with biaspheric multifocal central presbyopia laser in situ keratomileusis

Michiel H A Luger,Tobias Ewering,Samuel Arba-Mosquera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825f02f5

IF: 3.152

Cornea

Abstract:Purpose: To analyze simultaneous vision (distance and near) 1-year after biaspheric multifocal central presbyLASIK treatments for hyperopia and myopia with or without astigmatism. Methods: Patients were treated to correct distance ametropias and alleviating presbyopic symptoms simultaneously. All patients have been treated in Presby aberration-free mode using FemtoLASIK for Sphere from -7.00 to +3.25 diopters (D), astigmatism up to 3.00 D, and addition up to +2.75 D. No eye had previous corneal refractive surgery. Preoperative corneal curvature ranged between 40 and 48 D, with pachymetry thicker than 500 μm. Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better, with near vision of 0.2 logRAD or better with addition up to +2.50 D. Results: Sixty-six eyes treated bilaterally using PresbyMAX software were reviewed. For 31 patients (94%), 1-year follow-up was completed. At 1 year, 70% of patients achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity 0.1 logMAR or better, 84% patients obtained uncorrected near visual acuity 0.1 logRAD or better, and 83% of eyes were within 0.75 D of defocus. Postoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.47 ± 0.44 D. Stability was achieved from the 6-week follow-up. Eighty-five percent of patients achieved simultaneously uncorrected distance visual acuity 0.2 logMAR or better and uncorrected near visual acuity 0.2 logRAD or better. Conclusion: Patient selection and expectation management is essential to achieve patient satisfaction. Even though optically the results are predictable and good, some patients find it difficult to adapt to the compromise and others are dissatisfied by the minor loss of distance visual acuity. Certain individuals are best suited for PresbyMAX. A test with multifocal contact lenses or trial frames that creates slightly defocused images can be used to simulate postoperative visual impressions and verify patient acceptance.
BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Definitions

James S. Wolffsohn,Shehzad A. Naroo,Mark A. Bullimore,Jennifer P. Craig,Leon N. Davies,Maria Markoulli,Cristina Schnider,Philip B. Morgan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102155

IF: 3.946

2024-04-14

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Abstract:Presbyopia is often the first sign of ageing experienced by humans. Standardising terminology and adopting it across the BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia reports, improves consistency in the communication of the evidence-based understanding of this universal physiological process. Presbyopia can be functionally and psychologically debilitating, especially for those with poor access to eyecare. Presbyopia was defined as occurring when the physiologically normal age-related reduction in the eye's focusing range reaches a point that, when optimally corrected for far vision, the clarity of vision at near is insufficient to satisfy an individual's requirements. Accommodation is the change in optical power of the eye due to a change in crystalline lens shape and position, whereas pseudo-accommodation is the attainment of functional near vision in an emmetropic or far-corrected eye without changing the refractive power of the eye. Other definitions specific to vision and lenses for presbyopia were also defined. It is recommended that these definitions be consistently adopted in order to standardise future research, clinical evaluations and education.

ophthalmology
Outcomes of Corneal Compound Myopic Astigmatism with Presbyopia by Zeiss PRESBYOND® Laser Blended Vision LASIK Using Default CRS-Master® Target Refractions for Reduced Anisometropia

Julia Hernández-Lucena,Federico Alonso-Aliste,Jonatan Amián-Cordero,José-María Sánchez-González

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13103011

IF: 3.9

2024-05-21

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background/Objectives: Presbyopia, a common age-related refractive error, affects over a billion people globally and significantly impacts daily life. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 288 eyes of 144 patients undergoing LBV PRESBYOND® treatment for myopic presbyopia with astigmatism, aiming to evaluate precision, efficacy, safety, and stability over six months. Results: Key findings include high efficacy, with 99% of distance-eyes achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/25 or better, and 85% of near-eyes achieving UDVA of 20/32 or better. The results show excellent refractive outcomes, with 99% of long-sighted eyes and 97% of near-sighted eyes having a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±1.00 D. Safety was demonstrated by no loss of two or more Snellen lines after treatment, with 94% of patients maintaining corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before and after surgery. Conclusions: Overall, LBV PRESBYOND® proved effective, safe, and well tolerated for myopic presbyopia correction, offering satisfactory visual outcomes and potential spectacle independence for various distances. This study underscores the importance of individualized treatment based on patient age, highlighting the positive impact of binocular summation on visual function. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting LBV PRESBYOND® as a viable option for addressing presbyopic myopia, offering insights into its efficacy and safety profile. Further research could explore postoperative stereopsis and long-term outcomes to enhance understanding and refine treatment protocols.

medicine, general & internal
Prognostic significance of HBeAg.

Y. Liaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(80)90476-X

IF: 29.4

1980-11-01

Gastroenterology

Abstract:
Hocus pocus: Breaking the curse of presbyopia

Neeraj Israni,Shruti Kochar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1086_22

Abstract:Background: Research and awareness on refractive solutions for presbyopia, commonly known as the "Curse of the 40's," is essential as a large population in the world suffer from vision impairments. Population-based surveys have shown that one billion people in the world are in presbyopic age. Purpose: Many structural and physiological changes occur in the eye with the onset of presbyopia, including the decrease in amplitude of accommodation. At present, various static and dynamic techniques have been attempted to give presbyopes good vision at near-, intermediate-, and far-viewing distances. The aim of the video is to familiarize the modern-day ophthalmologists to these modalities. Synopsis: In this video, we tried to summarize the indications and contraindications of presbyopic laser. Preoperative investigations like dominance testing and micro monovision testing are described. The role of neuroadaptation and patient counselling is emphasized. Static techniques described in the video include spectacles, contact lenses, surgical options like corneal inlays and onlays, corneal laser ablation, conductive keratoplasty, corneal implant lenses, INTRACOR and IOLs. Dynamic presbyopia correction (accommodative) is always surgical. This is split into lenticular (accommodating IOLs, piggyback, lens refilling, lentotomy) and scleral treatment (laser-assisted presbyopia reversal and scleral expansion bands). Highlights: The types of corneal laser ablation, which is otherwise very confusing, is elaborated in a step-wise manner here. The difference in approach of PresbyLasik (Nidek), Presbyond (Zeiss) - Laser Blended Vision, PresbyMax (Schwind), INTRACOR (Technolas) are explained with examples. Each approach has its pros and cons. Our challenge as a surgeon is to identify the best combination for the patient. This video illustrates the treatment options which can help break the curse of presbyopia. Online video link: https://youtu.be/rTxMIqMrgaw.
[New Progress of Excimer Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery for Presbyopia].

R Y Zhang,Y G Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20211215-00586

2022-01-01

Abstract:Presbyopia refers to the decline in the accommodation of eye that occurs with age, symptoms begin to appear after the age of 40 and the clarity of vision at near is insufficient to satisfy an individual's requirements. The correction of presbyopia include restoring natural accommodation and improving symptom. The former is still difficult to achieve at present, while the latter mainly involves wearing convex lens, and with more and more patients wanting to get rid of frame glasses, refractive surgery is gradually promoted and applied. Corneal refractive surgery, especially laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, is one of the most common methods for surgical correction of presbyopia. We reviewed the recent literature to introduce the mechanism of corneal refractive surgery treating presbyopia and the efficacy of different surgical algorithms.
Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies

James S Wolffsohn,Leon N Davies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004

Abstract:Presbyopia is a global problem affecting over a billion people worldwide. The prevalence of unmanaged presbyopia is as high as 50% of those over 50 years of age in developing world populations, due to a lack of awareness and accessibility to affordable treatment, and is even as high as 34% in developed countries. Definitions of presbyopia are inconsistent and varied, so we propose a redefinition that states "presbyopia occurs when the physiologically normal age-related reduction in the eye's focusing range reaches a point, when optimally corrected for distance vision, that the clarity of vision at near is insufficient to satisfy an individual's requirements". Strategies for correcting presbyopia include separate optical devices located in front of the visual system (reading glasses) or a change in the direction of gaze to view through optical zones of different optical powers (bifocal, trifocal or progressive addition spectacle lenses), monovision (with contact lenses, intraocular lenses, laser refractive surgery and corneal collagen shrinkage), simultaneous images (with contact lenses, intraocular lenses and corneal inlays), pinhole depth of focus expansion (with intraocular lenses, corneal inlays and pharmaceuticals), crystalline lens softening (with lasers or pharmaceuticals) or restored dynamics (with 'accommodating' intraocular lenses, scleral expansion techniques and ciliary muscle electrostimulation); these strategies may be applied differently to the two eyes to optimise the range of clear focus for an individual's task requirements and minimise adverse visual effects. However, none fully overcome presbyopia in all patients. While the restoration of natural accommodation or an equivalent remains elusive, guidance is given on presbyopic correction evaluation techniques.
Uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatment using AMARIS with the PresbyMAX module

Pierre Baudu,Franck Penin,Samuel Arba Mosquera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.023

Abstract:Purpose: To analyze the uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric multifocal central presbyopic laser in situ keratomileusis treatments. Design: Retrospective, interventional case series. Methods: setting. Private clinical practice. patient or study population. Three hundred fifty-eight presbyopic patients (43% males, 82 myopic), bilaterally treated, suitable for laser in situ keratomileusis, with monocular corrected distance visual acuity of 20/32 or better. intervention or observation procedure(s). PresbyMAX (Schwind Eye-Tech-Solutions GmbH and Co) biaspheric multifocal ablation. main outcome measures. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) after surgery and their changes compared with corrected distance visual acuity and corrected near visual acuity before surgery. Results: At 6 months, 76% of patients achieved a UDVA of 0.1 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/25) or better, 91% of patients obtained a UNVA of 0.1 logarithmic of the reading acuity determination (logRAD) (p3) or better, and 99% of patients were within 1 diopter of defocus. Postoperative mean spherical equivalent was -0.17 ± 0.34 diopter. Ninety-six percent of patients achieved a UDVA of 0.2 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/32) or better and a UNVA of 0.2 logRAD (p4) or better. Mean binocular corrected distance visual acuity degraded from 0.00 ± 0.01 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/20) to a UDVA of 0.09 ± 0.07 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/25). Mean binocular corrected near visual acuity degraded from 0.02 ± 0.01 logRAD (p2) to a UNVA of 0.07 ± 0.07 logRAD (p2). Conclusions: Although optically the results are predictable, approximately 17% of the patients did not obtain objectively successful outcomes. In presbyopic patients without symptomatic cataracts, but with refractive errors, the PresbyMAX will decrease the presbyopic symptoms and correct far distance refraction in the same treatment, offering spectacle-free vision in daily life in most of the patients. Further investigation is necessary to evaluate the overall benefit of this procedure.
Distribution of ochratoxin A in plasma and tissues of rats fed a naturally contaminated diet amended with micronized wheat fibres: effectiveness of mycotoxin sequestering activity.

N. Aoudia,E. K. Tangni,Y. Larondelle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FCT.2007.10.029

IF: 4.3

2008-03-01

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract:
OPTH_A_259011 2167..2178

Heather Floyd,Sima Chiva-Razavi,Alexandra Dorca,James A Katz,E. Barnes,Paul M Karpecki,M. Wuttke

Abstract:1The Midwest Center for Sight, Des Plaines, IL, USA; 2Kentucky Eye Institute, Lexington, KY, USA; 3Favoris AG, Basel, Switzerland; 4Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 5Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Garden City, NY, USA Abstract: Presbyopia is a common age-related vision disorder characterized by a progressive inability to focus on near objects. If uncorrected or under-corrected, presbyopia can significantly impact patients’ quality of life. Presbyopia represents an area of considerable unmet need due to its rising prevalence worldwide as the population ages, the high proportion of under-treated individuals in some parts of the world, and the limitations of currently available corrective methods. Progressive or bifocal spectacles are associated with peripheral blur, a restricted visual field and impaired depth perception, which have been linked to an increased risk of falls in the elderly. Contact lens options can be difficult to maintain due to the development of age-related dry eye symptoms and reduced manual dexterity. Other corrective methods involve surgical interventions that modify the optics of the cornea, replace the crystalline lens, or attempt to restore active accommodation. While patients undergoing surgery report satisfactory outcomes post-operatively, many of them eventually require reading glasses. Non-invasive therapies with novel mechanisms of action are currently being investigated; these include miotic agents and UNR844, a lipoic acid choline ester. In this narrative review, available evidence on presbyopia prevalence, quality of life impact and risk factors are described, with a focus on observational studies in nonclinical settings. The diagnosis pathway and patient journey in presbyopia are outlined, and various treatment options are analyzed. The data reviewed herein reveals significant gaps in the provision of vision correction for this common condition, with a paucity of effective, non-invasive treatment options broadly accessible to presbyopic individuals.

Medicine
Revisiting monovision for presbyopia

Abdallah Mahrous,Jessica B Ciralsky,Edward C Lai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000487

Abstract:Purpose of review: Presbyopia is an inevitable age-related loss of accommodation that results in spectacle dependence with common everyday near-vision tasks. Many surgical approaches to presbyopic correction have been investigated, with monovision correction being amongst the most common and attractive options. In this article, we will review the advantages and disadvantages of the new modalities of presbyopic monovision correction. Recent findings: New methods such as mini-monovision, corneal inlays, and multifocal corneal ablation aim to maximize stereopsis and decrease the anisometropic side effects of conventional monovision. These include inlays such as the KAMRA and Raindrop, and phakic intraocular lenses such as the hole ICL. Newer corneal laser refractive procedures such as small incision lenticule extraction have also shown good outcomes with monovision. Pseudophakic monovision using standard monofocal lenses still provides good results. Summary: Monovision for presbyopic correction continues to provide promising results. There are a number of new devices and techniques that have shown good visual acuity outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence.
[Bioptic methods of study in the diagnosis of cancer and other diseases of the lungs].

M. Shulutko,M. Vinner,V. Korobov,A. S. Tarasov,V. Sidorov

Abstract:

[Measurements of intracellular potential on spontaneously active vascular smooth muscle (guinea pig portal vein)].

Differential expression of the presynaptic protein SNAP‐25 in mammalian retina

BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Management with intraocular lenses

Vertex-disjoint copies of K4-

Delay- and topology-independent design for inducing amplitude death on networks with time-varying delay connections.

Laser refractive correction of presbyopia

Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays and New Developments

PresbyLASIK: A review of PresbyMAX, Supracor, and laser blended vision: Principles, planning, and outcomes

BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Mechanism and optics

One-year experience in presbyopia correction with biaspheric multifocal central presbyopia laser in situ keratomileusis

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Definitions

Outcomes of Corneal Compound Myopic Astigmatism with Presbyopia by Zeiss PRESBYOND® Laser Blended Vision LASIK Using Default CRS-Master® Target Refractions for Reduced Anisometropia

Prognostic significance of HBeAg.

Hocus pocus: Breaking the curse of presbyopia

[New Progress of Excimer Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery for Presbyopia].

Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies

Uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatment using AMARIS with the PresbyMAX module

Distribution of ochratoxin A in plasma and tissues of rats fed a naturally contaminated diet amended with micronized wheat fibres: effectiveness of mycotoxin sequestering activity.

OPTH_A_259011 2167..2178

Revisiting monovision for presbyopia

[Bioptic methods of study in the diagnosis of cancer and other diseases of the lungs].