Prediction of the stage shift growth of early-stage lung adenocarcinomas by volume-doubling time

En-Kuei Tang,Yun-Ju Wu,Chi-Shen Chen,Fu-Zong Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1759
2024-06-01
Abstract:Background: Prediction of subsolid nodule (SSN) interval growth is crucial for clinical management and decision making in lung cancer screening program. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated whether volume doubling time (VDT) is an independent factor for predicting SSN interval growth, or whether its predictive power is better than that of traditional semantic methods, such as nodular diameter or type. This study aimed to investigate whether VDT could provide added value in predicting the long-term natural course of SSNs (<3 cm) regarding stage shift. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 132 patients with spectrum lesions of lung adenocarcinoma who underwent two consecutive computed tomography (CT) examinations before surgical tissue proofing between 2012 and 2021 in Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. The VDTs were manually calculated from the volumetric segmentation using Schwartz's approximation formula. We utilized logistic regression to identify predictors associated with stage shift progression based on the VDT parameter. Results: The average duration of follow-up period was 3.629 years. A VDT-based nomogram model (model 2) based on CT semantic features, clinical characteristics, and the VDT parameter yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.877 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.807-0.928]. Compared with model 1 (CT semantic features and clinical characteristics), model 2 exhibited the better predictive performance for stage shift (AUC model 1: 0.833 versus AUC model 2: 0.877, P=0.047). In model 2, significant predictors of stage shift growth included initial nodule size [odds ratio (OR) =4.074, 95% CI: 1.368-12.135; P=0.012], SSN classification (OR =0.042; 95% CI: 0.006-0.288; P=0.001), follow-up period (OR =1.692, 95% CI: 1.337-2.140; P<0.001), and VDT classification (OR =2.327, 95% CI: 1.368-3.958; P=0.002). For the stage shift, the mean progression time for the VDT (>400 d) group was 7.595 years, and median progression time was 7.430 years. Additionally, a VDT ≤400 d is an important prognostic factor associated with aggressive growth behavior with a stage shift. Conclusions: VDT is crucial for predicting SSN stage shift growth irrespective of clinical and CT semantic features. This highlights its significance in informing follow-up protocols and surgical planning, emphasizing its prognostic value in predicting SSN growth.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?