Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance treatment in patients with TP53wt advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A subgroup analysis of the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study

Vicky Makker,Jose Alejandro Perez-Fidalgo,Giorgio Valabrega,Erika Hamilton,Toon Van Gorp,Jalid Sehouli,Klaudia Regináčová,Debra L Richardson,Tamar Perri,Amit M Oza,David S Miller,Eva Maria Guerra Alía,Ugo De Giorgi,Stephanie Henry,Daniel L Spitz,Pauline Wimberger,Markéta Bednaříková,Hye Sook Chon,Jerónimo Martínez-Garcia,Carmela Pisano,Jonathan S Berek,Ignacio Romero,Giovanni Scambia,Lorena Fariñas-Madrid,Joseph Buscema,Fabienne Schochter,Kai Li,Pratheek Kalyanapu,Christopher J Walker,Ignace Vergote
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.016
Abstract:Objective: To report long-term efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance therapy in adults with TP53 wild-type (TP53wt) stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) who achieved partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) following chemotherapy. Methods: Analysis of the prespecified, exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC from the phase 3 SIENDO study was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with TP53wt EC and across other patient subgroups were exploratory endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: Of the 263 patients enrolled in the SIENDO trial, 113 patients had TP53wt EC; 70/113 (61.9%) had TP53wt/proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) EC, and 29/113 (25.7%) had TP53wt/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) EC. As of April 1, 2024, the median PFS (mPFS) for TP53wt patients who received selinexor compared with placebo was 28.4 versus 5.2 months (36.8-month follow-up, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.73). A benefit in mPFS was seen with selinexor versus placebo regardless of MMR status (patients with TP53wt/pMMR EC: 39.5 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.71; patients with TP53wt/dMMR EC: 13.1 vs 3.7 months, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18-1.34). Selinexor treatment was generally manageable, with no new safety signals identified. Conclusion: In the phase 3 SIENDO study, selinexor maintenance therapy showed a promising efficacy signal and a manageable safety profile in the prespecified subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC who achieved a PR or CR following chemotherapy. These results are being further evaluated in an ongoing randomized phase 3 trial (NCT05611931).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?