Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10, October 2024. Background:Despite a growing body of literature regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there remains a wide diversity in surgical technique and clinical practice across providers.Purpose:To (1) describe current ACLR practice preferences among members of the Herodicus society and (2) determine whether these preferences are influenced by years in practice and overall surgical volume.Study Design:Cross-sectional study.Methods:A 24-question survey investigating surgeons' practices and preferred ACLR surgical techniques was sent via email to all active Herodicus Society members. Survey responses were subdivided by years of experience and overall ACLR annual case volume. Descriptive statistics were compiled and chi-square testing was utilized to determine the significance of experience and case volume on survey responses.Results:Of the 113 invited Herodicus Society members who perform ACLR, 69 (61%) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean ± SD of 30.9 ± 9.8 years of experience in clinical practice and performed a mean of 96.0 ± 50.7 primary and 21.6 ± 16.9 revision ACLR annually. Of revision cases, 72.1% were performed using a single-stage technique. Mean frequency of graft usage by surgeon was bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (58.6%), quadriceps autograft (14.6%), hamstring tendon autograft (14.0%), and allograft (11.8%). The plurality of surgeons responded that they used anterolateral augmentation "rarely" in primary ACLR (39.1%) and "sometimes" in revision ACLR (31.9%), with the majority performing lateral extra-articular tenodesis (66.7%) rather than anterolateral ligament reconstruction (14.5%). Most surgeons would not allow a 20-year-old football player to return before 7 months after ACLR (71.0%) but highly valued return-to-sports testing to determine readiness (94.2%). Higher volume surgeons performed single-stage revision ACLR at a significantly higher rate (79.8% vs 62.9%, P = .02) and significantly differed in return-to-sports criteria, with a greater proportion relying primarily on biometric testing (P = .01).Conclusion:The survey demonstrated that, in the Herodicus Society, a wide range of preferences exist regarding ACLR surgical technique. Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft is the most frequent primary ACLR graft choice. Most participants have not embraced newer techniques such as anterolateral or suture tape augmentation. Return to sports is generally not allowed before 7 months and heavily factors-in return-to-sports testing metrics, suggesting that purely time-based criteria for return to sports is not modern practice among elite sports medicine surgeons.

Editorial Commentary: Analysis of Practice Patterns and Changes for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Document the Past and Present, but High-Quality Data Should Inform the Future

Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Postoperative Care Among Leaders in the Field: A Survey of the Herodicus Society

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Treatment Requires Consideration of Physical Examination, Graft Selection, Surgical Technique, Rehabilitation, and Expected Outcomes With a Primary Goal of Prevention of Failure or Revision Surgery

Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Editorial Commentary: Graft Choice for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Will There Ever Be a Correct Answer? Probably Not

The "Golden Age" of quadriceps tendon grafts for the anterior cruciate ligament: a bibliometric analysis

Contemporary Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in the United States

Editorial Commentary: Promising Short-Term Results of Adolescent Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Warrant Long-Term Follow-up Study

Current trends in graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – part I: anatomy, biomechanics, graft incorporation and fixation

A Single-Surgeon 35-Year Experience With ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Auto- and Allografts With the Transtibial Technique

Editorial Commentary: Suture Tape Augmentation Enhances Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery and Is Cost-Effective, While Biologic Augmentation Requires Well-Powered Controlled Trials

Editorial Commentary: The Number One Cause of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Failure Is a Misplaced Femoral Tunnel: Over-the-Top Technique Plus Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Recommended

Functional and Symptomatic Improvements Based on the Femoral Tunnel Drilling Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

A comparison of clinical and radiological parameters with two arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, rehabilitation, and return to play: 2015 update

Editorial Commentary: Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Shows Positive Midterm Outcomes When Properly Indicated

Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Hybrid Transtibial Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Large Single-Center Case Series With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Editorial Commentary: Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Shows Advantages and Disadvantages

Advanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Reconstruction Techniques for Different Rupture Types

Comparison of clinical outcomes of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring grafts

Lateral femoral tunnel preparation and graft fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction–A discussion